Any old heads remember this? Transmission reflections... http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3658.msg69724#msg69724My 2 cent and no domineering: http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=834.0 I just tried to reproduce this with Jason's SSRB boards, my two signal generators and a new rigol ds1054. Should have worked. Alas I could not and dont know why. Could be my ignorance. Been known to happen. I did not use Jason's controller that I built and tested with him. But with reproduction of the input parameters using sig gennys should have been easy peasy. Twas not. I said Hmmm. I didnt want to go down setting up such a large peripheral reproduction in installing more software on the next pc. I could still do that tho. The bucket list is a fast moving train gathering new cars every day and I am at the wrong station. I had to switch tracks again and shelved any further attempts. I hope enough read this as this is the coup de grace moment: That secondary additive pulse arrives from a reflection to a SWR returning to the source. My other latest attempts have spelled this out. Clue: You have to get out of the way of the return. Check the parameters in the posted thread.When that returning pulse is in phase with the next transmission we get additive power. And that is what you are seeing. Think power line reflections. Now position that SWR at a particular point in a ring configuration and one gets a huge additive, reflective, resonant peak. The tester will see the grand results in their tools. I added LEDS to the sinks on the outside edge of the resonant fields and they lit very brightly(I cant remember the guys name about the two counter LEDS on a radiant probe.) No more videos from me as the last tests have become very obvious. I blew LEDS in the resonant field. I had to stack LEDS like in the stun gun charge pump stage. Again I took the stun gun circuit and inserted large resonant loops in the charge pump stage. I was chasing the attempt to build this pump greater. Operation was at 9Mhz just to compensate for the loop size. SM told me not to do this by an airport. The output inductor primary field impacts the input inductor secondary creating an in air feedback loop. I state this because when the tester gets the SWR and resonant down pat then they will want to connect differing loads to the testing circuit. And play by moving the SWR peak around the loop. I hope this fits in with what this thread is trying to achieve and Merry Christmas.
« Last Edit: 2018-09-17, 07:10:43 by giantkiller »
---------------------------
|