The effect of the nanopulse is easily subducted.
I told Jason about this. The dual pulse protocol has 3 components to it. The first component is the actual dual pulse itself and the second component is the spacing between the next pair coming in. The third component is the event.
The dual pulse itself, as outlined by Spherics is the necessary chain to affect copper. Key point here.
The second component is for the actual topology of the copper itself dealing with length, gauge, loop diameter or linear section, number of windings, spacing, volume, and mass. I know some of these seem redundant or not a correct collective but these are the entities that go into a copper target we have have all been creating.
The third component is the event. This we have all seen in many ways. To the untrained or inexperienced eye this area can be very exciting or mysterious. This area is what we are trying to lay claim to but have not been taught or experienced in. This area is not your typical experience factor.
We have loops and linear length of copper. These create fields that are only the start of what is necessary. The start is the 'Bias' or created medium with which we desire to communicate with. It is an interface with the surrounding environment. Like a buffer. To directly impact the surrounding takes more power, i.e. T.T.Brown. This could be an area to deal with but that will come later as everyone finds out the 'Safe' way to work this format. Brown used aluminum as his strike medium or buffer to then push against the surrounding medium. This worked very well. Make sense so far?
What others are trying to do is, whether they know it or not, is to create a medium with which to use to push against the surrounding. What would this do? The surrounding aether is a very stable pressure. Normally we don't effect it but in very slow ways like radio. But when it is flexed it wants balance at an extreme cost. It will not be moved. But we can do this by creating an opposing extreme pressure. High frequency, high potential do this. This is nothing new.
There are a myriad attempts to move this medium. Banging coils does just that! The medium reflects back with multiple echos. Spark gap in, crashing noise out.
Back to the copper. If there are other metals involved or other copper configurations near then they become what looks to be resistive. But it is not. The other materials lay in different frequency ranges. To match this range is to get a reflection back. To not match this frequency creates a bandwidth filter that subducts the event. When copper is struck at the correct frequency it rings. Think atomically. The other materials become bandpass filters which atomically absorb the activity. This is why low impedance, low inductance, low resistance, air core primaries are so important. There are no other materials present so the activity created can be seen. The activity is there but most of the times we only see the after effect because our tools are slower and have other metals in them. If one can get the correct tool configuration then one can see the event. Or we create the event within range of where 'We ARE'.
If you change your copper topology then you change the second component, the spacing. Obviously. Different space in the copper set equals different space in the 2nd component. The first component is directly related to copper. I am sure the other materials are close to this but with some variation. Different viscosity equals different speed. When the first 2 components are correct the 3rd component, the event will appear.
What to do with the event?
It is equivalent to a very finite strike range of a spark gap. So imagine hitting a select primary with an exacting strike instead of a flood of noise. Tesla loved the conical primary because it is a natural way to tune the primary, as in variable concentric turns with varying dimensional positions. The conical configuration uses a higher band of frequencies from the array of spark gap emissions.
Here is an interesting paradigm correction.
http://www.instructables.com/answers/Why-do-primary-coils-differ-in-shape-and-location-/To achieve the correct resonant effect, for what end result I don't know, the spark gap is made more intrusive and the later stage tuning is explicit. Why not find the correct input and be done?
Without the correct input all attempts look like this:
http://www.instructables.com/id/Quick-and-Dirty-Hand-Held-quotTesla-Coilquot/Or just play with a paper clip in the wall outlet?
Just another stun gun...
Author
Topic: Companion wave generator (Read 27901 times)
