|
Well I'm back and I will congratulate Wattsup on doing the video frame detective work. I didn't have the energy to do that. Thank you Peter for reinstating me.
Romerouk did not show waveforms to back up his claim; the voltages before and after the FWBR, and the voltage output from the DC-to-DC converter. If he had shown these waveforms for all of the different voltage settings on the DC-to-DC converter output his claim would have been credible. However, he intentionally did not show those waveforms because that would have exposed him.
Here is the critical point in the long clip as far as I am concerned: He sets the DC-to-DC converter to three volts and rotor slows down a lot. The output from the FWBR must have been very low voltage and also low in power in this case. We know from the replications that this is indeed the case. Some replications have the same rotor magnets and approximately the same pick-up coil configuration.
Now, you have to ask yourself, how could the motor run in self-sustaining mode under these conditions when you can make a guesstimate that after the FWBR the voltage must have been very low, perhaps a few volts. More importantly, the available power was very low. Simply put, the DC-to-DC converter would croak under these conditions. I am almost 100% sure that particular DC-to-DC converter needs at a bare minimum 9 volts on the input, because it was designed for a 12-volt input.
So, if a replicator ever gets to the point where they wire in the DC-to-DC converter, and sets the output to 3 volts, and temporally powers the converter with 12 volts from an external source, and then switches off the external power source and connects the FWBR output to the DC-to-DC converter input, their motor will grind to a halt right away. There will simply not be enough juice to power the DC-to-DC converter, much less the motor itself. The only logical explanation, barring the "magic tuning" speculation, is that Romero wired DC power into the FWBR output bus covertly, which is exactly what Wattsup found in the video frames.
The lesson here is that the enthusiasts and believers absolutely must demand from the person posting the alleged free energy clip is that their demo has to be supported by clear and unambiguous measurements that back up the claim. When you see a clip that allegedly demonstrates free energy, there is a logical thought process that you can follow where you collectively agree that it's an interesting clip but the proponent of the clip has to make measurements A, B, C, D and E before anybody gets excited about anything.
This process of logical deductive reasoning was not done for the Romero clips and I am hoping that this process does take place for the next time a situation like this happens. If Romero was subject to this process he would have run away right away because the measurements would have exposed him. If you look at the case of Ismael Avisio, it's basically the same thing. Ismael has no real measurement data to back up his claim yet people believe. On top of this when Ismael talks tech, to a discerning ear like mine, it's blatantly obvious he barely knows what he is talking about. Yet, he drops some buzzwords and those that want to believe will believe.
Anyway, Wattsup found what I predicted was done within the first day of seeing Romero's clips.
I suppose we are on the downward slope with respect to the replication phase. LaserSaber seems to have bowed out and ZeroFossilFuel has an ambitious build but he already has some serious doubts. It's probably going to take Plengo a few months more testing before he gives up. He concentrates on the smaller "victories" like seeing his rotor speed up under load but he knows that eventually he is going to have to deal with power-out vs. power-in because that's what it's all about.
Shame on Romerouk for orchestrating this farce. If you go back and read his comments from the beginning with a "new attitude" you might see them like I see them - he says whatever he has to say to pretend that everything is real. I know that there is a subtle difference between someone really telling the truth because of their conviction and somebody not telling the truth at all and pretending the whole way though. If you read his comments again with a critical ear you should be able to detect the latter modus operandum. You can tell that often Romero was improvising his answers to detailed technical questions. There is a parallel here to to what Wattsup said about looking at his video clips again (which I haven't done). Once you look at his video clips again keeping in mind what Wattsup said about the camera angles that Romero was trying to avoid, it should become painfully obvious that that's what was really happening.
Anyway, that's about my final take on the Romerouk deal. Sorry for all of the people that believed in this and especially sorry for the people that put time and money into this project. Better luck next time but do your due diligence beforehand. Don't take the pure visuals of a clip for granted. The person making that clip has to make real scope and multimeter measurements to support their claim. Without that then the pattern risks repeating itself all over again.
MileHigh
|
Author
Topic: Romerouk's Muller Replication (Read 510780 times)
