Ah having thought on this some more, with Romero's setup i can already try my idea above, but instead of 2 moving coils i can use the top and bottom coil but connect them in anti series, the result is that no current would flow in the 2 series coils and there would be no torque on the rotor, at least i am pretty sure i already tried this and that was the result. So i have stopped the torque on the rotor by not being able to drain any current from the induced coils even though i have induced voltage across each coil, so then i imagine then that by drawing current from the coil that an opposite magnetic field is setup around the conductor that cuts the flux line, so when a flux induces a current in the conductor there is an opposing field setup in the same conductor which is proportional to the resulting current that is flowing in the conductor. So overunity is simple then, all we need to do is provide current only from a separate source and add this to the induced voltage of each coil in a balanced way between top and bottom coils and we have free energy EDIT so by providing just 1 amp of current from another unrelated source and combining that with the induced voltage of a coil we would get P = I x V P = 1 x 15 = 15 Watts of energy that would not slow the rotor, i know how to get the voltage without current, but how do you get current without voltage, well could this be our new form of induction. Induction current without voltage? i don't think we have a way of measuring this or am i wrong, all our test equipment requires current to pass a resistive loop to enable us to measure it, or is it a case of phasing out the voltage and grabbing the current when the voltage is out of phase.
« Last Edit: 2011-07-30, 14:18:53 by Peterae »
|