Brad,
I have a question regarding your two field theory as depicted by "FIELD GRADIENT 1.bmp in reply #102 (which I have attached below).
Using the closed fist right hand rule (fingers closed, thumb pointing in the direction of the B field vector) we would place the heel of our fist on the face of the N pole of the magnet with our thumb pointing left in the direction of the N pole vectors. .
With your two pole theory, the magnet (and the right hand rule) supposedly behaves similarly because whatever the opposite "charges" are coming out of the magnet at the S pole, and even though they are flowing away from the pole, their magnetic polarity is the same as seen in the traditional sense.
OK, let's follow a field line. At the N pole, we remove the heel of our fist from the magnet's N pole, rotate our wrist to follow the field line's hairpin curve toward the S pole, our thumb now points to the right, following the blue arrow vectors.
At the S pole, we remove the tip of our thumb from the magnet's pole and rotate our wrist to make the field line's hairpin curve toward the N pole, and again, our thumb, now points to the right.
Anywhere we position our fist between the N and S pole along a field line, the magnetic field's vectors, and our thumb, always points to the right.
If the "magnetic polarity" is the same all along the field lines, what is actually cancelling in the center to produce your proposed null?
Consider your charged capacitor drawing of a few posts back, do you propose the electrical field lines are also incorrect and that there should also be a null in the middle of that field as well?
PW
With the capacitor plate model. there is indeed a point in the center and around the two plates, where the charge value is neither negative or positive, but an equal value of both.
The standard model of the field shows no reason why unlike poles repel, or like poles attract.
Looking at the !man made! vectors, we see these vectors coming out of the north end, and going in the south end.
Can you explain what is coming out and going into the PM body that causes this attraction between unlike poles, and repulsion between like poles?
Do you know of any other kind of force, other than negative and positive charges that behave like this?- and please don't say the magnetic force, as that is the force you are trying to explain.
Can i ask you this- Does the standard model of the magnetic field allow for a mono pole field around a ferromagnetic object, such as a steel sphere?
Does not the current model dictate that any magnetic object that carries a magnetic field, must have an equal and opposite field, were in current theory, the north field must be equal to. but opposite of the south field? If this is correct, then any unmagnetized ferromagnetic object placed near say the north fields of a PM, must have an equal and opposite south field-correct?
This must also mean that any unmagnetized ferromagnetic object will always be attracted to a PMs field-right.
Does the current field theory allow for an unmagnetized ferromagnetic object to be repelled by the field of a PM?
I have a video that i made years back, showing a steel ball being repelled by a magnetic field.
If we use the two field theory, it is clearly explained as to why that steel ball can be repelled by a magnetic field.
The reason we never use the field between the two poles, for things like electric motors and generators, is because that part of the field is neutral--it cant deliver any sort of useful work.
I am all ears if you can explain as to what the field is, and how it makes like poles repel, and unlike poles attract.
The two field theory explains that, and more, like the field being able to repel a steel ball.
And just because i don't know exactly what this charged field is around the PM body, and through all space, does not mean it does not exist.
You can't explain as to what the field is around a PM body, that exerts these forces either. Does that mean we dismiss the current field theory?
Telling me that it exerts a force on a charge is not telling me what is exerting a force on that charge.
Ask anyone here what exerts a force on a charge in an electric field, and we can all give an accurate answer.
Ask that same question about the magnetic field, and we get--well we don't know yet, but the model is correct.
At the S pole (P in your drawing) we would place the tip of our thumb against the face of the S pole with our thumb continuing to point toward the left. The curl of our fingers tells us which way electrons would be deflected at those two locations
So we know what places a force on an electron within an electric field.
I want to know what places a force on the electron in the magnetic field.
When some one asks how a train pulls the carriages, you don't answer by saying-the train pulls the carriages.
I need to know what the engine is, and how it works.
See, here is my problem PW.
In the not to distant future, i am going to be asked to explain as to how something i invented works.
The problem i have is, the current magnetic field theory says the field is conservative, and that is not going to work for me.
So, i need to find a field theory that fits and works for said invention.
My current two field theory fits like a glove.
All my experiments over the past 30 odd years, point toward this two field theory being correct.
The two field theory allows for an imbalance within the fields, where it could be said that the north field can be of greater magnitude to that of the south field-an imbalance of charge-much like the asymmetric capacitor.
Here is an interesting video to watch
This guy has very high credentials
Propellantless Propulsion Device
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhsKMWOYuYoBrad
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
Author
Topic: On the notion of a magnetic motor (Read 22878 times)
