Before digging history of inventions and understanding of how things work the common language is required. So please share your own level of understanding and keep arogance, ignorance and all other bad human traits away from it.
When I share my own thoughts and ideas and being met with hostility because I challenge status quo that breaks whole conversation.
Rules of the Bench.... Share a build.... Build shared Samsung Motor for Aether Energy.
Share operating Intellectual Property with explanation of why this is so.
The Common Language and what constitutes forum rules is defined by theories.
Theories are NOT facts. Explanation of the Aetheric Energy is rejected on the Premise that it isnt a 'Fact' based upon an excepted common theory.
Rinse and Variably repeat for all builds.
Start again...
Set up topic to define Aether as to what Tesla would have thought of it as or incorporate his thoughts into our understandings.
This includes what Tesla considered PRESSURE in a circuit as a way to define our common language of 'electricity'.
Ask for crazies (those who hold electron spin as supreme source.) to give their understanding of Aether and Electricity.
No one wants to define the common language used for 'electricity' manufacture on forum.
We are or at least I am, trying to redefine this Common Language that is based upon a Fake electrolysis experiment of putting electrons in water to make 2 gases as the Basis of the Entire Atomic Structure and thus where 'electricity' comes from.
To dismantle this fakery, and why failure on this forum to achieve Over Unity, we go back to the one single experiment that defines the Atomic Structure. We find it doesnt split water it splits a caustic Liquid because if it was pure water nothing happens. So we ADD stuff to get the reaction we want and claim its something other that it is....
One doesnt get any more FAKE than this. And its drummed into every high school kid and held as a
fact for Life.
So electrons have entered common language and accepted as fact and no dissent is allowed.
The Crazies dont seem to want to define this common language of what electricity is.
Until you realize T-1000 (and many others here) that your common language is fake, your science is Fake, what you Believe is Fake, can we get a common language to move forward with. You hold dear fake theories to reverse engineer what others SEEMED to achieve. But we must Trust the Science. Wall Thornhill trusted the science. Before he Died Suddenly, he was attempting to make the electron a DI-POLE or what I call a Structure of Light with a Polarity. The guy knew its all fake, and in my opinion he was nothing but controlled opposition.
Defining 'energy', 'electricity' and 'Aether' according to Tesla's understandings and there are lots of History here to ponder, we may get a common group think more in tune with what was also taught when Alchemists were the experts like Newton. The infinity Circuit has Opposite and Equal actions. We are an Infinity Circuit of 'electricity'. We are a Product of Aetheric Energy. We USE Atheric Energy to run a marathon. We also USE the Ambient sea of 'energy' when we breathe and this has escaped everyones attention and fails to be included in Common Language.
Until you answer the question of what you think Aether energy is, and what you think electricity is that you want MORE OF, can we move forward. You may at any time leave the 'game'. Or you may stay, but the bench does have rules and for the 4th time, We are here to understand Aether and Energy like You and Others on this bench understand it. Until we get all this fakery out in the open and examine it thoroughly, will you ever understand what it is the Samsung motor produces without any Hertz. Or that its "design" is a Motor AND a Generator in One.
I contend that when you understand it then you can build it. Its like the cart and the horse. If this were not the case, it would already have been done.
All my theories are out in the open, Verpies it seems hasnt read or followed links to the Structure of Light and how 6 of them make a Light Crystals, as Prima Matter. We are not up to what I think or believe. The theme of the thread is What YOU People as Reverse Engineers believe it is.
I claim all of youse have Dissociative Cognizance. Believing in Fake Theories yet produce real results and there is a lot of contesting as to what is Real about anyone's results. You are Basing your Reality on Fake Science but no one here has a problem with that and this mindset then determines forum rules. It doesnt get much worse than this in any reality we care to mention.
You call it Hostility. Care to give me another "way" to say that all you know is 'basically' WRONG?
Of course you are going to get your feathers ruffled. There is no nice way to say your thoughts and ideas are perverted facts and will give perverted results in a fake reality. You have to LEARN to question your own reality and what you believe. This is REAL science. Question Everything.
And here we are continuously debating what can and cant be said on this forum and 'Our Ambassador' even recognizes there is nothing useful here on the forum. I say the two are connected.
I need for YOUSE all to think for yourselves. Not regurgitate common fake theories. Otherwise Mr Samsung will be elusive to your reality.
To recognize that your theories are Fake, you need to actually DEFINE what it is that you believe.
If you dont want to and just want to be spoon fed some new theory that you will reject because you still dont see that what you believe is Fake, then say so. But my theory has already been given in other threads and links and can easily be found and isnt 'relevant YET.
The Relevance is on your part. Deconstructing your Myths aint easy. The Cult like dogma is strong with 'electrons'.
If you dont understand the Aether then say so.
We already know you dont understand 'electricity' when you state,
The main missunderstanding is on electricity phenomena itself. and then fail to give any understanding of 'electricity' other than we live in a Sea of it and it powers nature.
The theme of the thread is for the crazies to give their views. I can but draw the conclusion you dont have any. Others resort to wikifakepedia.
The Ball is in Your Court. Pick it up. The alternative is unthinkable.
Author
Topic: New Look at Olde Technology. (Read 6830 times)
