Guest editorial from Cloxxki
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-50824-8Bin-Juine Huang and team (Director of New Energy Center, NTU) / Robert William Greenyer (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project)
People used to get really excited when there were milliwatts of hypothetical “overunity” in play.
Shows the world that you can transmute atoms, get excess energy out, yet the wise men shrug their shoulders. There's not even the radiation that Marie Curie fatally encountered.
Under the electron beam microscope, we find corroboration of previous findings in similar research. Micron scale structures adhering to specific geometries, seemingly having birthed adjacent deposits of new fractals of various elements. We see carbon tubes seemingly having grown from attached spherical structures, if not growing from its own tip.
A wide range of minerals are found not originally part of the Huang/Greenyer study, including amongst other tin, iron, carbon, silver, etc. In the long term Bendall/ "Thunderstorm Generator" (TSG) run on natural gas, amongst other things Carbon-14 is found, "dated" to an "age" of 30,000 years. Highly anomalous to find so much Carbon-14, let alone of such an age.
What WOULD be impressive to the resident experts, if witnessing the birth of bioavailable minerals amid excess energy just doesn't quite get them excited? It's not as dialed as some alchemists claimed to have gotten it, but does that render the processes anything BUT alchemy?
alchemy
/ˈalkəmi/
noun
the medieval forerunner of chemistry, concerned with the transmutation of matter, in particular with attempts to convert base metals into gold or find a universal elixir.
"occult sciences, such as alchemy and astrology"
Silver is already found from an experiment using copper pipes and water, but that's not gold so...who cares?
"universal elixir", according to Oxford? Well, look at the wide range of bioavailable minerals found deposited to Huang's copper oxide pipe material... An (un)educated human would not be impressed, but an viral strain aspiring to be a one-cell organism might see it like the banquet worthy of a king?
In Huang's experiment, one of the copper pipes was found to have collapsed. Normally that would require 700 bars of pressure, or very high temperatures that were not occuring during the experiment. Something is going on when these Exotic Vacuum Objects are doing their thing. John Hutchison has seen objects lose all apparent mass, and become malleable like a caressed spoon.
Greenyer, on the electron microscope, finds structures adhering very accurately to Tesla's recommended geometry for a tower. Coincidence to be shrugged off, or something to look deeper into?
Malcolm Bendall may well be getting ahead of himself developing a theory of everything, but just because a forum commenter "doesn't see the big deal", doesn't mean it's all wrong and won't ever lead to deeper and more actionable insights.
Malcolm Bendall's Thunderstorm Generator (TSG) indeed reminds us of the GEET reactor, that had to be suppressed violently because it was just not going to amount to anything, I remember that one. Nested pipes, engine, fresher exhaust. Same difference, right? Sort of. GEET bubbled air through the fuel before sending it through the reactor, while TSG bubbles pre-ionized air, then through the reactor and the fuel comes in only just before combustion. Bendall insists that the reactor needs to be the nested pipes between nested spheres. I'm not convinced, but he does get results this way. I'd like to see a wide spectrum of amended setups to understand once more what GEET did and didn't do, and how its function differs from the pre-ionized air and straight fuel of TSG. Ultimately, I wonder whether there is something GEET did that could contribute to TSG. But perhaps the Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVO)/plasmoids just need to be introduced and it doesn't matter whether they came from bubbling water or fuel.
If the TSG gets certified, it totally wipes the establishments "carbon bogeyman" taxation programs. They believe carbon emission rising causes overall atmospheric temperatures to rise, and that that's a bad thing, and it's not actually the other way around, that high temperatures cause more bioavailable gaseous carbon to be supplied to flora. Some of us heard about the Jurassic and its dinosaurs in school. Everything green, everything big, right? We weren't told that CO2 levels were roughly 10x as high compared to now, when we suffer from deserts forming and crops bring too little harvest to feed us all.
Anyway, in many countries, carbon emissions are the new definition of evil and anti-green. Despite being actual bioavailable plant food, go figure. Politicians and interest groups...
With a TSG installed in your car or genset, the authorities will not be able to measure notable carbon emissions, just oxygen and the more atmospherically common nitrogen. No carbon, no need for taxed fuels. A huge difference for the world we're supposed to live in.
But it's not turning lead into gold with a "sim salabim" and double tap from a magic wand, so who would ever care, aye...?
I'll ask again, what WOULD impress the all-wise resident new energy enthusiasts? Where is the line drawn? Or is it a moving goalpost, like in every good marriage?
End editorial
See also an interesting “ maybe” ?
“Water can trigger nuclear reactions to produce energy and isotope gases “( under discussion)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-50824-8@Please Note
Topic closed to generic musings for the time being , as relevant data from actual labs and research facilities arrives
It will be updated (good or “bad”)
All such Data is welcomed!
Respectfully
Chet K