PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2024-11-26, 08:25:31
News: A feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
There is also a "Shout" feature on each page. Only available to members.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23
Author Topic: Kapanadze replication  (Read 69538 times)
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2735
maxmalone
Quote
Many forums have been closed. Now overunity.com
Do you know why? Because no one has a working device. NOTHING!

I like to use the neurosurgeon analogy. There are over 8 billion people on the planet but only 50,000 neurosurgeons, why do you suppose that is?. The fact is 99.99% of people have neither the intelligence, skill or determination to become a neurosurgeon that's why. Only the best and brightest who are willing to dedicate there life to the art get to become a neurosurgeon. So it's important to understand our own limitations...

AC









---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
I respectfully disagree. That is the narrative he wanted to project. Look at these two pictures, you can see that the wire does not pass through the center. Looks like he drilled a hole and passed the wire around back. Also the Turkish units don't have the cable running through any coil and those units have huge power.

Not the best image from this side, but it doesn't pass through.


Best view is at 26.33 of the video.



-JA

Why doesn't anyone consider the possibility that the yellow wire soldered into the lid of the jar may not be a wire?
A thin tube, such as is used in the thermostats of an ordinary refrigerator, may look like this.
Often these tubes have a plastic protective coating on them, much like the insulation on an electrical wire.


Here is another interesting point that no one paid attention to.
Please watch this fragment from the video, sound is required, time period 00:31 - 00:33

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMBai8O3x1E

Such strange little things make you believe that the device really works.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
Why doesn't anyone consider the possibility that the yellow wire soldered into the lid of the jar may not be a wire?
A thin tube, such as is used in the thermostats of an ordinary refrigerator, may look like this.
Often these tubes have a plastic protective coating on them, much like the insulation on an electrical wire.


Here is another interesting point that no one paid attention to.
Please watch this fragment from the video, sound is required, time period 00:31 - 00:33

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMBai8O3x1E

Such strange little things make you believe that the device really works.


Anything else you think...?
This has all been discussed before.
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
So what next, with a thin tube? Where is this discussion? Why, when the device is turned off, do 5,000-watt lamps continue to glow for 1.5 seconds at the same brightness, while the device makes a strange sound?

Why is there no sound when the device is running under heavy load? Any electronics engineer will tell you that the opposite usually happens.

The whole discussion is reset to the trivial topic of spark and coil. With the addition of Tesla's mystical potion.

Where is the extraordinary creative thinking?

Just for an example of the principle of generating low frequency electricity:

https://youtu.be/uh1RnD_yuYo?t=1611
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
So what next, with a thin tube? Where is this discussion? Why, when the device is turned off, do 5,000-watt lamps continue to glow for 1.5 seconds at the same brightness, while the device makes a strange sound?

Why is there no sound when the device is running under heavy load? Any electronics engineer will tell you that the opposite usually happens.

The whole discussion is reset to the trivial topic of spark and coil. With the addition of Tesla's mystical potion.

Where is the extraordinary creative thinking?

Just for an example of the principle of generating low frequency electricity:

https://youtu.be/uh1RnD_yuYo?t=1611


Gas tubes have been discussed before. What kind of gas could it be and why? There are magnetic gases. No one has discovered anything related to this yet.
The sound was analyzed and corresponds to what Kapanadze said about frequencies. The principle of operation cannot be understood based on sound alone. The sound is probably coming from a coil or metal box. Probably not from the inverter. When Kapanadze unplugs the device, he is surprised at what sound it makes. He says it needs to be investigated.

The sound is 10,7,10 pulses. approx. 35Hz with 380Hz fill
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
When Kapanadze unplugs the device, he is surprised at what sound it makes. He says it needs to be investigated.

The sound is 10,7,10 pulses. approx. 35Hz with 380Hz fill
When Kapanadze unplugs the device from the inverter 220V 50 Hz, he is surprised at what sound it makes.
this means the bobbin ( not "coil", but "bobbin", as in Kapanadze Patents ) is getting out of control.
The generator loses synchronization with a frequency of 50 Hz.
The voltage 220 V 50 Hz comes from the input terminals of the transformer, in fact from an external inverter.

A generator with 2 transistors can continue to operate using the energy of capacitors that are connected after the rectifier. But this is subject to very low current consumption by this circuit. The capacitors do not look like they have a large capacitance.

Okay, let's analyze further.
If the capacitors powered the circuit for 1 second after switching off, then the voltage across them would decrease linearly with time. The 5 kilowatt lamps would gradually go out.

But what do we see? The lamps glow normally for 1 - 1.5 seconds and then go out abruptly.
This is weird. Are these transistors needed at all? Or was this circuit on two transistors soldered together just to fool observers? To point the finger at the spark and refer to Nikola Tesla?

This leads to the idea that the Kapanadze bobbin is a self-sufficient generator. When current 27 Ampere passes from hidden source to load through the bobbin wire, it creates internal in bobbin a magnetic field that affects the hidden elements in the bobbin. For example, if there are magnets inside the bobbin, "from a magnetic separator", as Kapanadze said, then the field of the coil can compress or push them apart, depending on how the magnets are located and the coil is wound.
In this case, the current from the elements inside the coil is interrupted, the magnetic field of the coil disappears, and the elements begin to generate current again. So on the cycle.
Since we observe a very low frequency, about 50 Hz, the nature of this resonance is not electrical.
Another. Mechanical, electrochemical, etc.

Power from the inverter is probably only needed for the initial start-up and synchronization of the generator bobbin at 50 Hz.
If so, it becomes clear why the electronic part is so simple and weak.
Because Kapanadze’s generator does not need an electronic circuit!
Kapanadze is not an electronics expert because his generators don't need that. We see how in the aquarium he sketched completely meaningless boards from the trash, with wire harnesses cut off and not connected anywhere, boards from old tube TVs, the terminals of vacuum tubes are filled with hot-melt glue that does not melt from the heat, etc..
 This was all done to create for non-professional observers the appearance of a complex device that has a high price.

What remains? We see a bobbin, which is a pulsed current source. AC battery controlled by voltage pulses.
 What kind of technology is inside? Chemical, electrochemical, liquid, gas, vacuum?
The main question is does the Kapanadze generator use any consumables? Does such a generator need fuel?
There is no clear answer yet.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
When Kapanadze unplugs the device from the inverter 220V 50 Hz, he is surprised at what sound it makes.
this means the bobbin ( not "coil", but "bobbin", as in Kapanadze Patents ) is getting out of control.
The generator loses synchronization with a frequency of 50 Hz.
The voltage 220 V 50 Hz comes from the input terminals of the transformer, in fact from an external inverter.

A generator with 2 transistors can continue to operate using the energy of capacitors that are connected after the rectifier. But this is subject to very low current consumption by this circuit. The capacitors do not look like they have a large capacitance.

Okay, let's analyze further.
If the capacitors powered the circuit for 1 second after switching off, then the voltage across them would decrease linearly with time. The 5 kilowatt lamps would gradually go out.

But what do we see? The lamps glow normally for 1 - 1.5 seconds and then go out abruptly.
This is weird. Are these transistors needed at all? Or was this circuit on two transistors soldered together just to fool observers? To point the finger at the spark and refer to Nikola Tesla?

This leads to the idea that the Kapanadze bobbin is a self-sufficient generator. When current 27 Ampere passes from hidden source to load through the bobbin wire, it creates internal in bobbin a magnetic field that affects the hidden elements in the bobbin. For example, if there are magnets inside the bobbin, "from a magnetic separator", as Kapanadze said, then the field of the coil can compress or push them apart, depending on how the magnets are located and the coil is wound.
In this case, the current from the elements inside the coil is interrupted, the magnetic field of the coil disappears, and the elements begin to generate current again. So on the cycle.
Since we observe a very low frequency, about 50 Hz, the nature of this resonance is not electrical.
Another. Mechanical, electrochemical, etc.

Power from the inverter is probably only needed for the initial start-up and synchronization of the generator bobbin at 50 Hz.
If so, it becomes clear why the electronic part is so simple and weak.
Because Kapanadze’s generator does not need an electronic circuit!
Kapanadze is not an electronics expert because his generators don't need that. We see how in the aquarium he sketched completely meaningless boards from the trash, with wire harnesses cut off and not connected anywhere, boards from old tube TVs, the terminals of vacuum tubes are filled with hot-melt glue that does not melt from the heat, etc..
 This was all done to create for non-professional observers the appearance of a complex device that has a high price.

What remains? We see a bobbin, which is a pulsed current source. AC battery controlled by voltage pulses.
 What kind of technology is inside? Chemical, electrochemical, liquid, gas, vacuum?
The main question is does the Kapanadze generator use any consumables? Does such a generator need fuel?
There is no clear answer yet.


If you play the sound very loudly and listen to the moment of switching on, then apart from sounds at the end you will hear the characteristic sound of switching off. Crash. Just like a relay. Note that up to this point the lamps are lit normally, as you have noticed. This is how Kapanadze describes this action in the patent and it is consistent with what we see. Unfortunately this is a loose fit. There is no such resonance that is free. Each resonance accumulates energy like a capacitor, so it cannot be explained by resonance. If we have a free source for resonance, it's ok, but it's like saying I have electricity from the wind. These are words generally said for those who know what it means. What the wind really does and the equipment needed for it.
Kapanadze apparently became terribly worried after the video was made public. He shouted that now everyone will do it to themselves. So what is so difficult about the fact that no one can find this simple answer? how it's working.
Many people also analyzed the magnets inside. The humming sound after turning it off corresponds to what you hear. This is just one possibility.
I did various tests with magnets and coils inside and never saw any gain. I found that the magnet is the same blind spot when it is not moving. It's not understandable at first, but when you think a few more times you will understand that when you act on the mages, it acts on you, and when you want it to stop, it stops too. Squeezing the magnetic field of a magnet will do nothing. Think more about this. If that were the case, two magnets would be your generator. A coil with a magnet is even worse because you first have to create a magnetic field in the coil and only then use it.
Maybe there is a way but we haven't figured it out yet.



   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
I did various tests with magnets and coils inside and never saw any gain. I found that the magnet is the same blind spot when it is not moving. It's not understandable at first, but when you think a few more times you will understand that when you act on the mages, it acts on you, and when you want it to stop, it stops too. Squeezing the magnetic field of a magnet will do nothing.

Yes, that's right, squeezing or pushing the magnets apart won't do anything if you don't have "fuel". Just like in a car engine.

What is “fuel” in the context of Kapanadze’s generator?
It’s not clear yet exactly. Let's focus on the abstract something. Hypotheses:
There are 2 options:

1. Energy cell.
Something like element CR2032 or much thinner. When compressed, the element generates a current pulse and squeezes out the consumed fuel; when stretched, it sucks fuel from the fuel line.
The cells are installed inside the fuel line as spacers between disk magnets.
The “fuel” is not consumed, but is regenerated in the energy cell when a current pulse is created. The "fuel" circulates in a closed cycle.
Many energy cells are used in series.
The time lag of the process provides the required frequency.

2. Mechanical magnetic generator.
From the starting current pulse in the bobbin, the magnets compress the “fuel” to a critical state, after which the “fuel” burns and pushes the magnets apart, generating a current that passes through the bobbin and compresses the magnets again.
The magnets are located in the fuel line, at the inlet and outlet of which valves are installed. Thus, the bobbin core independently pumps fuel during operation. The "fuel" can be regenerated during the "combustion" process.

In both options, the wires on the bobbin can be wound with two combined coils, as they like “bifilar”.
Each coil can have one row of turns in the bobbin, which can alternate. This may be necessary to interact with individual magnets mounted at opposite poles. The core may contain combinations of magnets and iron washers.

If anyone is interested in the simplest circuits of decorative spark generator using two ancient transistors, similar to those used in Kapanadze’s video:
https://cxem.net/house/1-263.php
https://shopshoker.ru/stati/shema-elektroshokera
https://radioskot.ru/publ/bp/ehlektroshoker/7-1-0-267
https://forum.cxem.net/uploads/post-9667-1155102865.gif
 please use Google translator or etc.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
Yes, that's right, squeezing or pushing the magnets apart won't do anything if you don't have "fuel". Just like in a car engine.

What is “fuel” in the context of Kapanadze’s generator?
It’s not clear yet exactly. Let's focus on the abstract something. Hypotheses:
There are 2 options:

1. Energy cell.
Something like element CR2032 or much thinner. When compressed, the element generates a current pulse and squeezes out the consumed fuel; when stretched, it sucks fuel from the fuel line.
The cells are installed inside the fuel line as spacers between disk magnets.
The “fuel” is not consumed, but is regenerated in the energy cell when a current pulse is created. The "fuel" circulates in a closed cycle.
Many energy cells are used in series.
The time lag of the process provides the required frequency.

2. Mechanical magnetic generator.
From the starting current pulse in the bobbin, the magnets compress the “fuel” to a critical state, after which the “fuel” burns and pushes the magnets apart, generating a current that passes through the bobbin and compresses the magnets again.
The magnets are located in the fuel line, at the inlet and outlet of which valves are installed. Thus, the bobbin core independently pumps fuel during operation. The "fuel" can be regenerated during the "combustion" process.

In both options, the wires on the bobbin can be wound with two combined coils, as they like “bifilar”.
Each coil can have one row of turns in the bobbin, which can alternate. This may be necessary to interact with individual magnets mounted at opposite poles. The core may contain combinations of magnets and iron washers.

If anyone is interested in the simplest circuits of decorative spark generator using two ancient transistors, similar to those used in Kapanadze’s video:
https://cxem.net/house/1-263.php
https://shopshoker.ru/stati/shema-elektroshokera
https://radioskot.ru/publ/bp/ehlektroshoker/7-1-0-267
https://forum.cxem.net/uploads/post-9667-1155102865.gif
 please use Google translator or etc.

I don't know a method that regenerates fuel and burns fuel. In my fantasies this is acceptable.
I understand that you mean fuel as a magnetic field of permanent magnets?
This is the only possibility that comes to my mind. Another is electrostatics and the transfer of charges from one place to another.
If it were possible to produce only + plus charges, we would already have FE. Unfortunately, in order to get only + pluses, you have to divide the loads and this is called work.
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
Most people only look where they see. But the world is big and varied.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect

All Kapanadze devices can only exist on the same principle.

Analyze whether it is possible to build all Kapanadze’s devices, including hydraulic and gravitational ones, based on what is more convenient for you to talk about.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
Most people only look where they see. But the world is big and varied.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect

All Kapanadze devices can only exist on the same principle.

Analyze whether it is possible to build all Kapanadze’s devices, including hydraulic and gravitational ones, based on what is more convenient for you to talk about.


You think I haven't thought about it? for 20 years, everyone involved in the topic has been trying to put it together. I also thought that it must be the same principle because it is impossible that one person invented more than one principle of operation.
Give me any interpretation of the device and you will see that each device has hundreds of possibilities.
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
The underlying principle has to be simple. Easily said I know.

I think you can discard everything that is easily seen in the Kapanadze devices. He came across as a paranoid individual (tore down devices after demo etc.), so I don't think he would want to risk revealing the secret in plain sight. The secret to the devices must lie in the unseen, which obviously presents some problems when we only have images and videos to go by.

Didn't Kapanadze say that Andrey Melnichenko was close? Melnichenko filed a patent describing how it's possible to draw a load from a secondary (or indeed many secondaries) coil wound on a magnetically permeable core without affecting the source. The source is just a magnetic wave generator and the secondaries focus the magnetic field and generate an electric current. He said it was important to only draw a load from the secondaries when the magnetic field is collapsing.

I did some high level tests on this principle and it seems to work. I'm now in the process of setting up a more exhaustive test apparatus.
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
What Kapanadze spoke about to the public raises great doubts, since telling the truth, of course, was not in his interests.
I do not find any increase in energy in Melnichenko’s experiments. This seems to be a dead end, just like Tesla's direction.

Many people have written that the basic principle should be simple.
But this can't be right. The 8 billion people living on the planet are not so stupid that at least 10,000 of them do not realize simple things.

The principle must be complex for this to actually work.
A subtle effect that is difficult to implement and barely noticeable when special conditions are provided.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
The underlying principle has to be simple. Easily said I know.

I think you can discard everything that is easily seen in the Kapanadze devices. He came across as a paranoid individual (tore down devices after demo etc.), so I don't think he would want to risk revealing the secret in plain sight. The secret to the devices must lie in the unseen, which obviously presents some problems when we only have images and videos to go by.

Didn't Kapanadze say that Andrey Melnichenko was close? Melnichenko filed a patent describing how it's possible to draw a load from a secondary (or indeed many secondaries) coil wound on a magnetically permeable core without affecting the source. The source is just a magnetic wave generator and the secondaries focus the magnetic field and generate an electric current. He said it was important to only draw a load from the secondaries when the magnetic field is collapsing.

I did some high level tests on this principle and it seems to work. I'm now in the process of setting up a more exhaustive test apparatus.

This is how a circuit with a diode and a coil works.
There is no amplification effect in this setting.
I know that Melchinenko showed several versions, but none of them has been confirmed.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
What Kapanadze spoke about to the public raises great doubts, since telling the truth, of course, was not in his interests.
I do not find any increase in energy in Melnichenko’s experiments. This seems to be a dead end, just like Tesla's direction.

Many people have written that the basic principle should be simple.
But this can't be right. The 8 billion people living on the planet are not so stupid that at least 10,000 of them do not realize simple things.

The principle must be complex for this to actually work.
A subtle effect that is difficult to implement and barely noticeable when special conditions are provided.


I think you are not right.
It used to be said: you don't pay for banging a hammer! but because I know where to bang.

Unfortunately, many of the descriptions coincide with what Kapanadze said and what we know or are trying to match.
You probably know the game for adults: the child has to say what he or she is thinking about using different words. How difficult it is sometimes to guess what a child means. It's the same here. If you knew one or two words for a specific purpose, it would certainly shorten our path, like a shortcut to the destination on a map.
I recently analyzed it for hydrogen and we concluded that it is not possible. The smallest hydrogen exchanger would weigh several kilograms and take up much more space. Of course, there may be some operating mode where when hydrogen appears, it is immediately converted into electricity, but I doubt it. On the other hand, yes, it is fuel and Kapanadze did it earlier with his friends on film.

Any type of alpha or beta radiation is not possible, so it can be omitted.

There is no known method of recuperation without obtaining energy from the source.
The battery releases current and has no return when loaded; True?

These kW show something abnormal! 88W becomes 5kW, it must be fuel! I don't know, maybe you can create a magnetic field when you burn some gas? then this gas is ionized and instead of an explosion, a strong magnetic field occurs. This is just another idea out of a hundred others.

It is also possible that something is missing in the Melchinenko transformer. Some fuel?
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2735
Sergh
Quote
What Kapanadze spoke about to the public raises great doubts, since telling the truth, of course, was not in his interests.
I do not find any increase in energy in Melnichenko’s experiments. This seems to be a dead end, just like Tesla's direction.

Many people have written that the basic principle should be simple.
But this can't be right. The 8 billion people living on the planet are not so stupid that at least 10,000 of them do not realize simple things.

The principle must be complex for this to actually work.
A subtle effect that is difficult to implement and barely noticeable when special conditions are provided.

Good observations, a technology can look simple yet be complex. For example, the Down Wind Faster Than The Wind technology looks very simple and only has three moving parts (wheels, drive chain, propeller). However 99% of people came to the wrong conclusions and thought it was a hoax. As you say how could so many people, even most of the best and brightest, completely screw up something so simple?.

In effect most have been brain washed. They were taught to believe the world works in a certain way and there mind will not allow any exceptions. For example, a majority of people believe they have an imaginary friend who lives in the sky and nobody can tell them any different. They believe what others have told them and no amount of proof could convince them otherwise. In effect "there mind has been set" and will not allow for a reset.

I understand this better than others because my mind is fluid, it is not set and changes like the wind. In fact, all the greatest minds in history did not believe in any authority. They did not follow anyone nor did they believe what anyone said. They were there own man and determined the facts of a matter for themselves. This is why some people can do things which most others cannot.

AC
 





---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
Sergh
Good observations, a technology can look simple yet be complex. For example, the Down Wind Faster Than The Wind technology looks very simple and only has three moving parts (wheels, drive chain, propeller). However 99% of people came to the wrong conclusions and thought it was a hoax. As you say how could so many people, even most of the best and brightest, completely screw up something so simple?.

In effect most have been brain washed. They were taught to believe the world works in a certain way and there mind will not allow any exceptions. For example, a majority of people believe they have an imaginary friend who lives in the sky and nobody can tell them any different. They believe what others have told them and no amount of proof could convince them otherwise. In effect "there mind has been set" and will not allow for a reset.

I understand this better than others because my mind is fluid, it is not set and changes like the wind. In fact, all the greatest minds in history did not believe in any authority. They did not follow anyone nor did they believe what anyone said. They were there own man and determined the facts of a matter for themselves. This is why some people can do things which most others cannot.

AC

People have always believed in something.
Some in God, others in UFOs and others in nothing!?
but that's not true. They believe in money and fame.
There are certainly those who did not believe in radioactivity, but they are no longer among us. There are so many things yet to be discovered. e.g. Mendeleev's table. Everyone sees holes in it, but not everyone knows that this board has no ending. After all, only the holes are shown, not the continuation. One more or less atom turns an element into something amazingly different. Isn't it fascinating? Of course.
Most people are not interested in how TV works, they want to use it and don't say that they are ignorant or idiots. I would call them hardware testers. Don't you know a new profession? software tester ?! This is what the "useless" people do. Of course, there are also people who are not interested in electronics, but they are interested in music, for example, so why do they need to know how electric organs are constructed? This is obvious. Do you know neurosurgery? or breastfeeding?  :) :D
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81

I recently analyzed it for hydrogen and we concluded that it is not possible. The smallest hydrogen exchanger would weigh several kilograms and take up much more space. Of course, there may be some operating mode where when hydrogen appears, it is immediately converted into electricity, but I doubt it. On the other hand, yes, it is fuel and Kapanadze did it earlier with his friends on film.


Not certainly in that way. If you do not release hydrogen as a gas, then it may be different.
Take a discharged salt battery, an AA battery with a voltage of 1.5 volts, and charge it for a couple of seconds with a voltage of 5 volts. Then turn off the charger and quickly measure the voltage on the batteries. It is advisable to quickly turn off the battery over electronic circuit and measure with an oscilloscope.
But this is not quite what is needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(electrochemistry)

How can one even understand when Kapanadze is telling the truth and when he is creating information noise?
How do you even weed out fake videos about obtaining free energy, of which there are many thousands on YouTube?

The information provided must be redundant and go beyond what is necessary. If everything follows a predictable path, is trivial, ordinary and understandable - it’s fake.

When Kapanadze talks about research into gravity, antigravity, and we don’t see a trivial wheel with weights on him, this is a break in the pattern. So are some of his other words, which he spoke in Georgian for his friends on the video.
When he says that the generator is based on the work of Tesla, and at the same time opens a page with a printout of Linde’s apparatus, this is going beyond the boundaries of the matrix.

Have you been to Georgia? There are their own people and everyone else. “Friends” are relatives, fellow countrymen and close friends.

All others are treated like customers in a store, no matter how much they try to gain trust.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
Not certainly in that way. If you do not release hydrogen as a gas, then it may be different.
Take a discharged salt battery, an AA battery with a voltage of 1.5 volts, and charge it for a couple of seconds with a voltage of 5 volts. Then turn off the charger and quickly measure the voltage on the batteries. It is advisable to quickly turn off the battery over electronic circuit and measure with an oscilloscope.
But this is not quite what is needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(electrochemistry)

How can one even understand when Kapanadze is telling the truth and when he is creating information noise?
How do you even weed out fake videos about obtaining free energy, of which there are many thousands on YouTube?
The information provided must be redundant and go beyond what is necessary. If everything follows a predictable path, is trivial, ordinary and understandable - it’s fake.

When Kapanadze talks about research into gravity, antigravity, and we don’t see a trivial wheel with weights on him, this is a break in the pattern. So are some of his other words, which he spoke in Georgian for his friends on the video.
When he says that the generator is based on the work of Tesla, and at the same time opens a page with a printout of Linde’s apparatus, this is going beyond the boundaries of the matrix.

Have you been to Georgia? There are their own people and everyone else. “Friends” are relatives, fellow countrymen and close friends.

All others are treated like customers in a store, no matter how much they try to gain trust.


Everything's OK. We're here because we hope he did it and maybe we can do it again. However, after 20 years, I doubt that anything has changed. No Dally, Ruslan, SR193, Akula are no reliable.
When Kapanadze saw the SR193 video, he said it was 100% a fraud. That it's definitely not his device. It does not work like that.
What did he see that made him say this immediately?
I will answer: he did not see what was really important. What he hides. That's why he said it doesn't work and is false.

no coils, spark or ferrites are what gives the device power, so what? what is similar to Melchinenko? which is not present in SR193
« Last Edit: 2024-07-06, 09:02:04 by maxmalone »
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
Kapanadze with Melnichenko can only combine the word "resonance". Kapanadze read on the Internet that there is such a Melnichenko that "invented" resonance.
He began to answer the questions of the audience about the principle of the generator’s work, so that they could be asked Melnichenko, since he himself cannot say. :-\

But what a resonance was worried at that time Kapanadze, which forced him to look for articles about resonance on the Internet, now you can only guess by sound from the bobbin turned off and why this sound does not have a frequency of 50 Hz.
He probably could not configure the fluctuations in the bobbin core, mechano-electro-chemical resonance to the required frequency. "Resonance in Resonance" (c) Kapanadze.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 159
Kapanadze with Melnichenko can only combine the word "resonance". Kapanadze read on the Internet that there is such a Melnichenko that "invented" resonance.
He began to answer the questions of the audience about the principle of the generator’s work, so that they could be asked Melnichenko, since he himself cannot say. :-\

But what a resonance was worried at that time Kapanadze, which forced him to look for articles about resonance on the Internet, now you can only guess by sound from the bobbin turned off and why this sound does not have a frequency of 50 Hz.
He probably could not configure the fluctuations in the bobbin core, mechano-electro-chemical resonance to the required frequency. "Resonance in Resonance" (c) Kapanadze.

Resonance within resonance? this is too general. We can say that it is AM modulation. fish. You could also say it's a tuning fork.
In my opinion, the principle is recuperation until circulating energy is achieved. The resonance of the first coil affected the second one and the second one affected the first one. It seems impossible because no one has done it yet. In fact, this is actually the basic diagram of a Tesla coil. True.
The only thing missing is recuperation, i.e. adding the output current to the input current but as a wave, although in the patent it is a circuit where the capacitor is powered. Maybe that's enough. Maybe this capacitor is the resonance circuit of the second coil?
Kapanadze mentioned that everything that is important is the length of the cables.
The shutdown frequencies certainly reveal something about the device. It's definitely an important tip, but we don't know yet what to do with it.
Does Kapanadze use the core? I don't know, but in the conversation he vehemently denied it, although I think it's because it's important. He wanted to fool people. He was actually talking about Tesla, not what's in his device. The question was about the core in the Tesla coil.
   
Jr. Member
**

Posts: 81
AM modulation has been widely used in transmitters and receivers and is unrelated to resonance. This is all too simple and has been mathematically and practically tested for a long time. Radio engineers have long learned to combine waves; read the technical literature. they add waves at any frequency, but this does not produce additional energy greater than the total expended.
   

Newbie
*

Posts: 27
I can not find the patent. Do you have a link please?

Aking21, Shame on me for missing this comment. For a quick read please go to my topic here.
https://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3687.0

I know some people get cranky when you add files not associated with the named thread so I will just provide a link that will certainly get you in the right direction. There are a few new patents by Nilson, It's kind of strange that Leal is nowhere to be found, but I do recall reading that Nilson was driven by God (in the early days) to develop the original machine, but I am not sure what is driving him now.

Here is a link:

https://www.patentguru.com/assignee/evolu%C3%87%C3%95es-cient%C3%8Dficas-e-tecnol%C3%93gicas-ltda


I certainly don’t want to pollute this thread with B&L, Figuera, or other comments, so if admins find it warranted to remove this post, please do. I haven’t looked to see if there are other active threads for B&L and Figuera.

Some open thoughts

On these forums (globally), there is no shortage of people honoring themselves for achieving less than unity. The Overunity dot Com site became the beacon of light for such a mindset. It is completely natural to believe that your opinion is more valid than others, and most validate their opinion by claiming they have been doing this for years so they should be looked on as the Authority having Jurisdiction.

I am no different; I like reading people's comments that align with my thoughts or, better, my confirmation bias. I developed the site OUcafe.net (shameless plug) specifically to consolidate data on the subject and to better influence a global thought process by connecting similar thinking people through their forum posts. This, I believe, will drive us to solution faster and help in eliminating roadblocks.

Hopefully something written on this site triggers a thought process on another site (maybe Indonesia) that triggers an action on another forum, maybe Mooker or Beyond Unity. The only thing in it for me is the satisfaction that I am contributing where I can. A better world is in our hands.

-JA
   

Newbie
*

Posts: 27
Everything was in metal box. What are you talking about ? ...........

Hey maxmalone, I appreciate your comment. On the original 2012 B&L website the following was written on a page that I have tracked down over a year ago.

Quote
Under the observation and monitoring of the guests of the event, among them several electrical engineers who used current, voltage, temperature and frequency measuring equipment, the prototypes were turned on and started working. The first to be connected were the three-phase free space electron captors 300 kva 220/380v, which were interconnected to the self-generation module through the cycle.

Just like Tariel, the Input is the Output. Looking at it holistically, they only added electrons to the wire as identified by the clamp-on meter.

If there is a B&L thread, lets move the discussion there.

-JA
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 274
Let's have a look at I found.    http://www.rexresearch.com/marks/marks.htm
This might be explaining Kapanadze' device ?
   
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-11-26, 08:25:31