PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
OverUnity Research > Electrical / Electronic Devices > Tariel Kapanadze's Devices (Moderators: verpies, Apecore) > Kapanadze replication
2024-11-26, 11:32:28
News: If you have a suggestion or need for a new board title, please PM the Admins.
Please remember to keep topics and posts of the FE or casual nature. :)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Author Topic: Kapanadze replication  (Read 69741 times)
Topic Options img
img  andyw33
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #250 on: 2023-10-10, 22:33:32 »
Newbie
*

Posts: 10
@lfarrand
Thanks for coil description.
Here is my circuit, maybe usefull for someone (only in circuit simulator, not yet implemented)



Falstad link https://tinyurl.com/ynx5rfsp


P.S. Delamorto, I'm sorry for offtopic of Kapanadze, it is different circuit than his
   
img  DELAMORTO
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #251 on: 2023-10-10, 22:41:54 »

Full Member
***

Posts: 171
Quote from: andyw33 on 2023-10-10, 22:33:32
@lfarrand
Thanks for coil description.
Here is my circuit, maybe usefull for someone (only in circuit simulator, not yet implemented)



Falstad link https://tinyurl.com/ynx5rfsp


P.S. Delamorto, I'm sorry for offtopic of Kapanadze, it is different circuit than his
Well, this is just the circuit of Atsyukovsky’s inductor at high voltage. Not the main circuit, but an inductor that will create magnetic oscillations. Like Tesla!
   
img  DELAMORTO
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #252 on: 2023-10-10, 22:49:45 »

Full Member
***

Posts: 171
This one is an independent coil. In fact, if you enlarge the picture from the video, you will see that the bottom of this coil is a flat coil (spiral) and then a regular multi-turn coil.
   
img  andyw33
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #253 on: 2023-10-10, 23:15:39 »
Newbie
*

Posts: 10
The coils in Atsyukovsky’s patent are  aircore?
   
img  lfarrand
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #254 on: 2023-10-11, 05:53:16 »
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
Quote from: verpies on 2023-10-10, 21:52:34
This is confusing because "input current" is not constant in time with AC.  Do you mean ?: ...input source current amplitude is constant in time...
This is confusing because "input source voltage" is not constant in time.  Do you mean ?: ...input source voltage amplitude is constant in time...

Apologies for the confusion. Yes, your corrections make more sense and that's what I meant.
   
img  lfarrand
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #255 on: 2023-10-11, 06:50:05 »
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
One thing I'd be wary of when using the Falstad simulator (and possibly others) is that the timestep setting can have a dramatic effect.

The default timestep is 5us, and often you will see magnificent results at that setting, but if you reduce it to 100ns or lower then the effects are gone. I prefer to use a timestep of 1ns to mitigate this to a certain extent. Lowering the timestep makes it harder to determine what is happening in human perceptible time intervals (seconds) because it takes a lot longer to run the simulation, but you do gain much more resolution for shorter time periods.

Reality doesn't have a resolution limitation, aside from the Planck length as far as I know. Instruments & probes do, but nevertheless it's best to experiment if at all possible. Don't place too much faith in simulations.
   
img  andyw33
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #256 on: 2023-10-11, 07:41:01 »
Newbie
*

Posts: 10
Quote from: lfarrand on 2023-10-11, 06:50:05
One thing I'd be wary of when using the Falstad simulator (and possibly others) is that the timestep setting can have a dramatic effect.

The default timestep is 5us, and often you will see magnificent results at that setting, but if you reduce it to 100ns or lower then the effects are gone. I prefer to use a timestep of 1ns to mitigate this to a certain extent. Lowering the timestep makes it harder to determine what is happening in human perceptible time intervals (seconds) because it takes a lot longer to run the simulation, but you do gain much more resolution for shorter time periods.

Reality doesn't have a resolution limitation, aside from the Planck length as far as I know. Instruments & probes do, but nevertheless it's best to experiment if at all possible. Don't place too much faith in simulations.

Thank you for the info. I will try my circuits with suggested time adjustment.
   
img  verpies
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #257 on: 2023-10-11, 08:54:37 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
Quote from: lfarrand on 2023-10-11, 05:53:16
Apologies for the confusion. Yes, your corrections make more sense and that's what I meant.
Ok, but that is not all.
There is an ambiguity about the type of the "input source".

Is it an AC voltage source or AC current source ?
...in one of the cases, which you describe, or in all of them ?
   
img  lfarrand
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #258 on: 2023-10-11, 09:22:53 »
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
Quote from: verpies on 2023-10-11, 08:54:37
Ok, but that is not all.
There is an ambiguity about the type of the "input source".

Is it an AC voltage source or AC current source ?
...in one of the cases, which you describe, or in all of them ?

I agree that it is best to limit ambiguity and ensure we're on the same page. I was thinking of an AC voltage source in both cases.

Series resonance circuit example: https://tinyurl.com/yt3oc33h
Parallel resonancecircuit example: https://tinyurl.com/ylkmnopk

I'd also like to express my thanks for your valuable input to the forum over the years. I know some members have taken your helpful advice the wrong way and saw it as an attack on their character, but I think you've got your heart in the right place.
   
img  verpies
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #259 on: 2023-10-11, 10:29:50 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
Quote from: lfarrand on 2023-10-11, 09:22:53
I was thinking of an AC voltage source in both cases.
Here is some food for thought for you:
https://tinyurl.com/yuyuczgg

Notice that the bottom circuit accumulates AC energy and the amplitude of current sloshing in its LC tank increases with time ...and eventually exceeds the amplitude of current flowing through the alternating input voltage source.  The voltage amplitude exceeds it, too.
   
img  DELAMORTO
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #260 on: 2023-10-11, 22:13:25 »

Full Member
***

Posts: 171
The moonshine still works in resonance too!  ;D Moreover, the resonator has an interesting appearance and calculations.
   
img  AlienGrey
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #261 on: 2023-10-14, 16:56:29 »
Group: Guest
Quote from: DELAMORTO on 2023-10-10, 11:23:47
The circuit of the original flashlight is different. You have options for it, I don’t think they’re working)))


It is necessary to force the protection of the microcircuit to work using the key VT3. This is the principle of working on it.
This is an original principle - no one repeated it....except me)))
Now I can write openly, not like before)))
In defense, care is not constant, but with a low, periodic frequency. This was enough for him to work on his own.
The Akula didn’t know this, so he molded what I told him.... in the end it all descended into a banal fake
Dug out this PCB found Led's blown as no current limit in line and VT3 shorts out Res Cap, not good and Leds flash
lights stop say off when battery's removed also in this circuit all coils in series in another two coils cancel out what's correct ?

Sil
   
img  DELAMORTO
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #262 on: 2023-10-14, 17:19:44 »

Full Member
***

Posts: 171
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2023-10-14, 16:56:29
Dug out this PCB found Led's blown as no current limit in line and VT3 shorts out Res Cap, not good and Leds flash
lights stop say off when battery's removed also in this circuit all coils in series in another two coils cancel out what's correct ?

Sil
VT3 makes a drawdown to turn on the protection, the LEDs are powered through the capacitor.
Everything is according to the original scheme..
MC34063 operates at frequencies up to 100 kHz, it is not used as a standard. Why they chose her, I don’t know.
It’s better to do it without it right away, it’s easier...much easier.
   
img  verpies
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #263 on: 2023-10-18, 11:43:03 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
Quote from: DELAMORTO on 2023-10-10, 12:55:25
It is much easier to do separate key management. That's what I would like)))
How would you set up the different keys ?
   
img  AlienGrey
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #264 on: 2023-10-18, 18:18:00 »
Group: Guest
Quote from: verpies on 2023-10-18, 11:43:03
How would you set up the different keys ?
Define what a key is or does. please
   
img  Grumage
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #265 on: 2023-10-18, 18:43:21 »

Group: Renaissance Man
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2765


Buy me a cigar
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2023-10-18, 18:18:00
Define what a key is or does. please

A switch, basically. A “ Morse code key “

I too dabbled a little with this device but my problem was electronically matching the switches to suit the opposite polarities. I often wondered whether this could be achieved by using one of the Arduino type thingies driving opto or electromagnetic reed switches. Would the effect manifest at low switching frequencies?

Cheers Grum

As a post script, has anyone run the circuit through simulation software?


---------------------------
Nanny state ? Left at the gate !! :)
   
img  AlienGrey
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #266 on: 2023-10-18, 19:01:54 »
Group: Guest
Quote from: Grumage on 2023-10-18, 18:43:21
A switch, basically. A “ Morse code key “

I too dabbled a little with this device but my problem was electronically matching the switches to suit the opposite polarities. I often wondered whether this could be achieved by using one of the Arduino type thingies driving opto or electromagnetic reed switches. Would the effect manifest at low switching frequencies?

Cheers Grum

As a post script, has anyone run the circuit through simulation software?
If that’s the case as I suspected, then I would think that device VT3 would be better placed on the neg side of the output diode, the other thing is
on the drawing i have all the windings shown  in series shouldn’t two of them be inductive canceling mode. Ive not tried that mode yet.

Sil
« Last Edit: 2023-10-19, 02:11:30 by AlienGrey »
   
img  verpies
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #267 on: 2023-10-19, 00:07:50 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2023-10-18, 18:18:00
Define what a key is or does. please
It is a Russian way of saying a "switch", but it does not have to be a mechanical switch (like in English).  In Russian it can mean any kind of a switch, including a transistor.
He used the word "key" in his posts, so I just went along with his exotic vocabulary.
   
img  chief kolbacict
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #268 on: 2023-10-20, 09:44:15 »

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 274
Quote from: chief kolbacict on 2023-01-23, 06:48:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI_HFnNTfyU
But in the link left on the neighboring forum, the professor has something spinning.
And the phase seems to be one. And the coil is one.
I mean I am unaware of the Rodin coil been shown to have a spinning magnetic field.
https://youtu.be/vyfIMkZuYhE
   
img  DELAMORTO
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #269 on: 2023-12-12, 13:11:29 »

Full Member
***

Posts: 171
It was in vain that Kapanadze’s main topic was closed; from the first days of his appearance, the topic of receiver-transmitter hung in the air. By the way, one officer from the special services then said about testing Kapanadze’s generator that this is a reception-transmission principle.
You should have asked the journalist where the transmitter is located if your generator is a receiver! ;D
   
img  AlienGrey
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #270 on: 2023-12-12, 14:36:21 »
Group: Guest
oops Sil
« Last Edit: 2023-12-12, 16:18:12 by AlienGrey »
   
img  AlienGrey
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #271 on: 2023-12-12, 16:09:32 »
Group: Guest
AlienGrey
Yes but on the other hand so to speak the Adrian Guska, device did the same thing yet he had a Tesla coil witch in it self is HV & HF and is a TX  device in it's self and an accelerator as well as pumping out magnetism, thus becoming a dipole until it is loaded up then it all disappears.  >:-)

Sil
   
img  T-1000
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #272 on: 2023-12-12, 18:10:03 »
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 375
Quote from: DELAMORTO on 2023-12-12, 13:11:29
It was in vain that Kapanadze’s main topic was closed; from the first days of his appearance, the topic of receiver-transmitter hung in the air. By the way, one officer from the special services then said about testing Kapanadze’s generator that this is a reception-transmission principle.
You should have asked the journalist where the transmitter is located if your generator is a receiver! ;D

Привет! Давно тебя невидел  :D

For some reason my personal opinion partly also wants to lean towards N. Tesla longitudinal waves transmiter-receiver principle.
But on another hand towards NMR reaction going on ferromagnetic materials(from what I saw with radiation coming out of thin air with very same high frequency wave inside low frequency wave modulation on Tesla coil).
And the common thing you see everythere - the high frequency wave embedded into low frequency wave. While high frequency tank LC circuit is on separate coil for 90^ magnetic fields coupling with main low frequency coil and with mixed frequency on output coil.
Like someone said - there are many ways to Rome.... :)

P.S. A bit offtopic - How to make longitudinal waves detector? We all know about Marconi transverse waves detector but need something different on antenna part.
   
img  DELAMORTO
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #273 on: 2023-12-12, 20:55:22 »

Full Member
***

Posts: 171
Kapanadze saw the effect by accident; he was assembling a completely different device. I don’t think there’s anything more complicated than a high-voltage multiplier. He also talked about the welding machine that worked when he was assembling something high-voltage..... and he saw that effect.
   
img  verpies
Re: Kapanadze replication « Reply #274 on: 2023-12-12, 22:02:20 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
Quote from: T-1000 on 2023-12-12, 18:10:03
l opinion partly also wants to lean towards N. Tesla longitudinal waves transmiter-receiver principle.
But on another hand towards NMR reaction going on ferromagnetic materials(from what I saw with radiation coming out of thin air with very same high frequency wave inside low frequency wave modulation on Tesla coil).
And the common thing you see everythere - the high frequency wave embedded into low frequency wave. While high frequency tank LC circuit is on separate coil for 90^ magnetic fields coupling with main low frequency coil and with mixed frequency on output coil.
Take a look at the attached paper. It describes a phenomenon that is similar to NMR but it affects ferromagnetic domains instead of the magnetic moments of the individual nuclei ...and its FWHM resonance bandwidth is much wider than in NMR.
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-11-26, 11:32:28