I have doubts only about one device. The one that was demonstrated to Wesley. Only because Kapanadze himself could not assemble it.
Are you saying that Tariel was who built that device in the diagram? And all others that he has shown were not his builds, such as his last one that I mentioned? If you have doubts about only one device, why do you denounce all others as fakes. You know that there has been no successfull replications of any of of Tariel's devices. Do you not think that something is wrong? NickZ
There can be no definite exact data on the resonator. I wandered without calculations. This is why I posted a diagram on this forum so that the resonator could be made in its own way (diameter, number of turns, etc.). I need alternative results!I powered the inverter and high-frequency generator from 12 volts. But no one forbids powering a high-frequency generator from 30 volts and getting more current.I have already given a drawing of the calculation of the resonator according to the proportion.The drawing is not mine, I do not understand the symbols. I liked the proportions of the turns. The frequency depends on the load, I took a Chinese PWM with a maximum frequency of 150 kHz
Hmmm, on your video's i see more like a square wave (modified sine) modulation, see below picture.What do you mean by "the 2nd version of the circuit oscillatory circuit"/Itsu
Itsu: Are you suggesting that this green box schematic is a actually a Kapagen circuit. Not made by Tariel and not a self running circuit? NickZ
He also stated that the principle is so simple that if you find out, you will laugh!
I do it according to the principle described in the patent. And you, according to any principle that was hung on your ears
...It IS a modified sine inverter to my knowledge....
Yes, because my inverter output is a square wave, not a sine wave....
Itsu,A modified sine wave inverter uses stepped rectangular waves to approximate a sine wave. The simplest modified sine has +/- going rectangular waves separated in time along the zero reference line. This reduces low order harmonic distortion. With the simple modified sine waveform described above, the first harmonics that will be produced are the fifth at -13.5dB and the seventh at -16.9dB.Adding additional steps in the modified sine waveform pushes the first harmonics produced out to even higher harmonics and further reduces their amplitudes as well. This allows low-order low-pass filters to be used to smooth the output and produce something closer to a pure sine wave.Delamorto appears to be using a simple square wave inverter.PW
Hi PW,thanks for confirming that.I was thrown off by his picture in his post #130 where he shows a "pure sine wave" modulated signal while on his video's he shows the "modified sine wave" modulated signal.My 150W modified sine wave inverter produces this kind of output signal while loaded with a 25W bulb:Itsu
Really! I don't do this, at all NickZ
Like these circuits that no one can get to work.
The waveform you posted of your inverter output is not what is produced from a modified sine wave inverter. Your posted waveform is what is output from a square wave inverter. If your inverter is labeled as a modified sine inverter, they are not stating the truth. As I previously stated, the simplest modified sine uses +/- going rectangular waves (not square) separated by time at the zero ref line. That is the simplest and lowest cost waveform produced from low cost modified sine inverters. Higher quality/cost modified sine inverters use additional rectangular steps to better approximate a sine wave which eliminates additional low order harmonics. A simple LC low-pass at the output can then be used to eliminate the higher order harmonics and produce a relatively pure sine wave.Some newer modified sine wave inverters use PWM to approximate the sine wave and after passing that through a low order low-pass produce a fairly pure sine wave.PW
Yes . A capacitance at the transformer output of 1-2 mF will make the shape softer. But for a scheme with 1 post this is not required. A square wave will also work.
Here is an example of a circuit from another Kapanadze patent. Just to understand the technical level of his circuits. Everything is done not on specialized chips, but the old fashioned way....