FE is not good for the economy nor for quickly overpopulating Earth humanity due to a comfort of it, turning it to man made apocalypse due to the food shortage, trashing all nature in the process of their expansion.
Math professors( friends) from Hunter in Manhattan calculated for me -it should start ~ 18 years from now if Energy delivery is for free (mostly in China, India, Africa)
I can see that you keep pressing this gibberish all over without any proof by supposingly quoting someone else who possible did some math work for you to make it looking real. I’m just disgusted.
...
I agree with you, Classic, that what you quoted is unfounded gibberish.
First of all, free energy would considerably develop the economy, not only by increasing usage in traditional sectors, but also by enabling the considerable development of either technologies that had already been mastered but that the cost of energy had made marginal, such as the desalination of seawater, or new technologies that are currently impossible, such as heating and lighting fields to grow crops in winter.
Improvements in the level of technology go hand in hand with improvements in the standard of living, and as you said, an increase in the standard of living does not lead to an increase in the population, but on the contrary to a decrease. It's a well-known fact that the higher the standard of living, the fewer children people have.
But the FE world is full of conspiracy theorists. Their authors spend their time misinforming, either knowingly or out of ignorance, not only about devices, but about everything around them.
Let me extend the debate a little. Some of these conspiracy theorists are environmental activists. Contrary to what they would have us believe, they don't want a green planet so much as the collapse of the capitalist system and the economy. If free energy appears, they will fight it, because they know it would be a new golden age for technology, which supports the consumer society they hate. So I'm not surprised to hear predictions of a planetary apocalypse in the event of FE, they make the same predictions based on climate or pollution. Generating fear is their method of consolidating power. Catholic priests were already doing the same thing centuries ago, promising hell to those who didn't follow God, by which they meant those who didn't follow them and their precepts. Replace "God" with "Nature", and you have the current situation.
As researchers of free or low-cost energy solutions, we need to understand that this mission is in the interest of people AND the planet, because it will lead to a reduction in the earth's population down to more reasonable levels, and its means of action, multiplied thanks to cheap energy, will be able to combat pollution and global warming. Of course, the production of FE must not be polluting, but I think that's on everyone's mind here.
Author
Topic: The argument for perpetual motion (Read 3853 times)
