@Hakasays Rather than a jab, when you're upset, you calm down and think. You are claiming that what we know can be wrong, because we don't know everything. Complete nonsense. Contrary to these followers of the FE who claim to know the secrets without ever producing it, scientists have never claimed that their knowledge was complete. Science will probably never be a total knowledge. Worse than the religious who try to see God where science has not yet the answer, as in the origin of the big bang, you try to see the possibility of FE not only in the unknowns but in everything we know too since scientists would have everything wrong. This is really nonsense. The Big Bang does not refer to an "initial instant" in the history of the Universe, it only says that the Universe has known an extremely dense and hot period, and this is only common sense: you just have to replay the evolution of the Universe in reverse, and you will find the Big Bang, in the same way that if you play a video in reverse you can see again the debris of an explosion that gathers. Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, not an assertion that we can ever have a cat in this state. In quantum mechanics, the maintenance of superposition states becomes impossible with macroscopic objects. Scientific theories are obviously unknown to you except in name, like "big bang" or "relativity" or "quantum mechanics". Your interpretations of poor or misunderstood popularizations of science have nothing to do with scientific facts and theories. There is no logic in what you say, only appositions. And on top of that you use your misinterpretations to accuse scientists who know considerably more than you about all the subjects, including their own limitations.
---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
|