F6FLT
As a moderate environmentalist my objection isn't with all humans, not anti-humanism which is absurd. Just the ignorant or deranged ones trying to destroy this planets ecosystems
...
You may be a moderate environmentalist, but the speech you reproduce in the sentence above is not far from the usual propaganda of not particularly moderate environmentalists.
They have not yet understood or pretend not to understand that nature has already eliminated millions of species before man appeared on earth, that nature is not fixed and evolves, that it is absurd to want to fix it to what the current generation knows, that global warming is a blessing, all past warming corresponded to periods of prosperity for man, CO2 is good for vegetation and it has been much more abundant in past periods of the earth, finally that none of the apocalyptic forecasts concerning it is credible, climatology being still far from mastering the subject, all the past forecasts of the IPCC show it, which turn out to be false over 5 years.
The increase in longevity is the sign that pollution, which is relative, is only the counterpart to pay for much more important advantages.
Nobody wants to destroy the planet, that's what the environmentalists want us to believe in order to obtain power by designating scapegoats among their political opponents, especially the supporters of the liberal economy.
By refusing to allow developing countries to exploit their resources in order to obtain the same standard of living as developed countries, by restricting the exploitation of the planet's resources because plants, animals or even simple landscapes would count more than humans, they are in a Malthusian approach.
Rules, a few precautions, and a little political control over industry are enough to keep the planet sufficiently clean and compatible with human well-being, we don't need the totalitarian ideology of the green Khmers, now instrumentalized by the counterproductive so-called green industry.
The researchers here should know that most of the environmentalists are against free energy. They even look favourably on the increase in the price of energy because it reduces its use. They know perfectly well that clean, abundant and free energy would be the trigger for a tremendous development of the economy, industry and consumer society they hate. For them, ecology is only a pretext for exercising political power to control people for the benefit of their sole vision of the "planet". If they claim to speak for future generations, it is because they want to silence yours.
Author
Topic: Humour (Read 8164 times)
