I have started this bench as a follow on to my "Generator using a superconductor" as what I have discovered goes well beyond that possibility. This has all come from my work on the "Marinov Generator" discussed on my bench of that name. Others have considered Marinov's claims for his motor that he bizarrely named the "Siberian Coliu". This led them to a derivation based on the so-called "convective" term borrowed from fluid dynamics. Unlike the conventional motional induction that creates a sideways force on a charge moving through a magnetic field, this "convective" vector identity yields a force along the charge's movement direction thus creating either a drag force or an accelerating force. My work on the Marinov motor and that of others have shown that this longitudinal force is a reality. What is now becoming clear is something that has been overlooked by the theoreticians, the fact that this "convective" term can induce voltage into a closed loop. Maybe it has been overlooked because it needs either a weird-shaped closed loop (like hairpin) for induction within known magnetic vector potential fields or a weird-shaped field for induction within a common closed loop (like circular). Whatever the reason Science is missing out on some hugely significant possibilities.
Superconductors are a way of life today, in MRI scanners everywhere. There is a cost involved in maintaining these as they use liquid nitrogen temperatures, and the liquid needs regular topping up. I could envisage a world where such FE generators would take the place of the distribution transformers that exist in urban areas, where consumers paid for their electricity to cover the cost of the installation and the running costs. This is not free energy, but significantly cheaper than what we pay now and certainly better for the planet.
Now things move beyond that possibility. The source of the "free" energy in my superconducting hairpin coil is in my opinion the orbital motion of electrons responsible for the magnetization in the Fe ring cores where they can give up energy if they endure a decelerating force. I argued that the electrons in my hairpin conductor suffer a deceleration as they travel round the sharp hairpin bend and that deceleration creates a form of E field within which the Fe orbital electrons do see a deceleration. What I have now discovered is the deceleration of the orbital electrons can come from the "convective" term. The current in the hairpin loop sets up a "weird" A field pattern such that a circular closed loop obtains a non-zero force around that loop. That opens up a new possibility, we do not need a superconductor to get to high value "free" current, we can get an effective "free" current at the surface of magnetized material. Thus the new generator possibility does not wind the hairpin coil around a plastic tube, it is wound around a ferromagnetic tube.
In the first image below I show the A field around the top of such a magnetized ferromagnetic tube. I also draw the effective surface current around the ring core there. In the next image I show the E field around that closed square current loop determined by the method shown in my "Generator using a superconductor" bench. This clearly shows that there is a non-zero voltage around that loop.
More to come on this later.
Smudge
|