From an old thread post:"How it works" - RUSLAN, et. al. FE Generator It appears most are "lost" with respect to the approach and theory underlying these types of energy generators therefore consider the following.
It may seem foreign at first but take some time to examine this information, several times if necessary, then take a few days off before getting
"wrapped around the axal" and doing the"RTTY Running Open" routine! No Stupid Comments... PLEASE, for the sake of those who might be
interested in learning more - keep the comments to only relevent, detailed, technical discussion - amongst yourselves.
BackgroundFrom a recent post and exchange with AG {thread Moderator} -
"Your question is likely more sarcastic than inqisitive but, if not, lets consider:"
[[ AG, I'll post this one more time. If you feel the need to "scrub/moderate it again" so be it - your the moderator, however, a very detailed presentation,
including CAE analysis with files along with more reference and CAD models and other material, will appear soon on a technical web site that is more
suited to, and capable of, handling complex engineering and physics details. Target date is February - once the internet, in general, has been cleaned
and once again provides secured open access. We all know the current "state-of-affairs," FE/CE included (unfortunately for us, writ large! But this too
will soon pass) ]]
Reference Designations below relate to those found in the "Vasik041 - Documentation - " thread (or whatever it's called) and two patents that were
posted (and subsequently removed by AG as off-topic or not-the-focus of discussion or what ever). These patent links, again, are:
SPACE DISCHARGE APPARATUS US2096460 filed 1936-01-23 issued Oct 19, 1937
Inventor F. B. LLEWELLYN Assignee BELL LABS (now AT&T)
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2096460A/en?oq=2%2c096%2c460 ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY OSCILLATORUS2520383A filed 1944-10-18 issued Aug 29, 1950
Inventor PALMER H. CRAIG Assignee INVEX Inc
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2520383A/en , or, copy of original filing for better view of formulas:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search?q=pn%3DUS2520383ANOTE: Patent US2096460 Fig 1. "cathode 4, grid 5" and Patent US2520383A Fig. 1. "2, G, P" are replaced by a "Tesla Coil" plus there a few other
modifications - [no heated cathode => vacuum tube not needed], Anode (second anode) is so called "Antenna;" however the theory of operation is valid
and describes the technology employed. Traveling Wave Tubes (TWT) further amplify the approach but carefully consider 2. below.
Discussion1. You have a basic system, without the Kacher/Antenna component, consisting of: (a.) a push-pull transistor combination driving; (b.) a toroid transformer
[split TV yoke] with center tapped Primary winding {L1a & L1b} and three turn secondary winding {L3} that, in turn; (c.) functions as the primary for an
air core secondary {Inductor L4}; (d.) which excites or Oscillates; (e.) the Grenade coil (L5).
Assume the above combination efficiency is near 96% [resonant if need be but not neccessarily required]. Somewhat similar to a simplified switch-mode
power supply, however the COP is still less than 1 (no excess energy).
2. To add excess energy this scheme might use a pulsed (*1) High Voltage Generator (f.) Kacher {L6 & L7} preferably in axial allignment with L4/L5 but not
necessarily required (*2); and, since the Grenade is comprised of a Helical Coil (g.) it functions as a "Slow Wave" device with respect to the L5 Oscillating field
(low/medium frequency in this case). *1 - HV => electron velocity; pulsed => phase; *2 without a focusing scheme the HV electron stream is (somewhat
randomly {?} ) distributed, but take into account the physical location of (f.) and the connected helix coiled [so called] Antenna and also note their respective
voltage levels when analyzing electron {beam} distribution (the Anode/Cathode relation as found, for example, in an "O type" TWT). The Beam distribution
pattern will adhear to that found in Electrostatic field interaction.
3. Keep in mind, Electrons are very light and can be easily accelerated by an electric field but can only be bent by a magnetic field {electric fields influence
electron speed, magnetic fields influence electron direction} (recall a CRT television - screen brightness <=> flyback transformer high voltage level - horizontal
and vertical raster scan <=> current driven yoke coil mounted on the CRT neck located right after the electron beam source but before the phosphor viewing screen).
4. By designing a device to have the HV Latcher emitted electron particles (called many different things) travel at or near the same speed (set by the HV
produced by a Katcher or Tesla Transformer or other high voltage generation scheme); as the field wavefront created by the Grenade coil {L4} signal nears
that of the electron particle stream (the electron beam), excess energy can be transfered from the HV particle stream to the Grenade Coil field thus increasing
the coil energy by four times the particle velocity (accelerated electron kinetic energy). This action is sometimes refered to as "Velocity Modulation." A modest
transfer efficiency is typicall 35% but this can be near 90% with a good design and deliver amplifications exceeding 60dB (1x106 or 1 million).
5. Many, including me, believe magnetics or electrostatics are responsible for the energy transfer between the HV electrons and the signal field but if that were
the case this system would have been easily replicated many years ago. A hint to the transfer is shown by Tesla in his electron "gun" and plate demonstration
and the theory is further supported in the patents referenced earlier.
6. High Q Resonant circuits help in increasing system efficiency but Resonance also complicates the ability to achieve overall excess added energy success.
This is clearly shown in wideband TWT Amplifier study.
7. Focusing on the electron particle velocity and signal field wavefront velocity while paying particular attention to their phases might well yield the energy
transfer mechanism. A numerical analysis appears to support this hypothesis as well as on-going Computer Aided Engineering finite element analysis.
The above postulation presents another viable way of viewing and solving the FE question. One should consider other approaches (and new methods) if
your current approach doesn't show progress after many many years! If we already knew the precise theory of operation and design techniques this system
would be in production (or at least leaked) by now.
IMHO this general Ruslan/Stalker scheme is very viable and only needs a bit of tweeking - less Q/Resonance initially with some detailed attention to electron
and field velocity and phase mechanics.
Methods and TechniquesUse Ansys AEDT and/or CST Design Suite CAE to varify/optimise operation (Solidworks CAD to draw coil, etc. parts; then import into CAE). Attempting a
hand-build is extremely difficult, as observed over the past 10 or more years, replications are near impossible. Engineering design methods and precission
CNC techniques are required; however the results are worth the effort. CAE also allows investigating many other FE methods, for example saturated Ferrite,
other non-linear devices, asymetric windings and transformers, etc.. CAE down the road can also assist in environmental analysis and optimization {Tesla in
vacuum is pretty wild, humidity in air is also pretty wild, etc.}!
TWT Theory - Derived Math links: Dr.P.Prasanna Murali krishna
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7L-fiYNqS4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkz-qWAr2ghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K_Ok_XThywhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63vnYb4sF2Qhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMywVY_au20https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7L-fiYNqS4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkFRpSqomg8TWT InformationRecent theory of traveling-wave tubes: a tutorial-review
https://silo.tips/queue/electron-devices-simulation-with-cst-studio-suite-richard-cousin-cst-cst-eumw-20?&queue_id=-1&v=1636076991&u=MzUuMTM2LjE5MC4xNDY=Simulation of Traveling-Wave Tubes for Analysis and Optimization in Modulated Back-Off
https://d-nb.info/1217326774/34RantI first proposed this theory of operation on an OU thread in, I believe, mid 2017 after reviewing the TopRuslan device. At first glance it had a striking r
esemblance to a TWT structure but at the time other duties and a lack of CAE tools delayed further in depth technical study. Shortly after many related
OU post, the OU cabal of shills, mis-information trolls and hucksters that resided on OU, and now elsewhere, I was banned for "disagreeing" with their
Golden Boys. BTW, the same banning, for the same reasons, happened at the AU forum. Moral - don't know more than the forum's fake experts and, for
sure, don't call them out or even remotely expose them (if they knew anything technical about the topic and/or not blocked those who do have some clue,
it would have all been completed more than 10 years ago).
I suspect that this banning thing will quickly migrate to this forum as well - so, if you briefly see this post, keep in mind my entire "data dump" will
appear on a credible web site very soon!
Thats all...
Author
Topic: The Aether and science (Read 17534 times)
