F6FLT
I think you may have it backwards and almost every revolutionary new discovery/theory was ridiculed initially and labelled alternative science. Einstein was called a quack, a heretic, a fraud and supposedly one year later only one other person had the integrity to claim they understood it. As well, Nikola Tesla received the same harsh treatment for his "alternative science" we now call polyphase induction motor/generator technology. It was Tesla, the engineer/inventor who opened up a whole new field for science to study.
Sorry to burst your bubble but the person credited for inventing the first real computer was Charles Babbage, an inventor and engineer. As well, most who contributed to the technology were also an inventor/engineers. It was only after the technology was realized that it was studied and became a science as is most often the case. For example, all the computer operating systems we know and use were invented by people who started programming in there garage ie. Gates, Jobs, Linux, not scientists.
It's not a difficult concept, people/inventors discover and invent stuff then scientists study it. Science: "the systematic study of the nature and behavior of the material and physical universe, based on observation, experiment, and measurement". The definition doesn't mention discovery or invention anywhere to my knowledge.
Most people seem confused on this matter and one cannot study something which is not in there possession or can be measured. Creativity, experimentation, discovery and invention always comes first. Once we have discovered/invented something then we can begin to study it which is where science comes in. So many seem to be putting the cart before the horse...
Regards
AC
Do you ever read and try to understand what others write? It becomes exhausting to repeat that the reasoning you hold is simply wrong. I have already explained why here: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4350.msg100716#msg100716. So same answer: The fact that someone was taken for a fool because what he was saying was taken for nonsense, and what he was saying was later proven to be correct and he was a genius, does not prove that the nonsense that most people, especially in the FE movement, say will turn out to be scientific truths and they geniuses. A particular case set up as a principle has no value. It is a basic logical fallacy that has absolutely no relevance to demonstrate anything about FE. And note that it only took Einstein less than 5 years to convince of the validity of his theory, much more revolutionary than a longitudinal EM wave in free space. So today with the fast communication means, if in less than a year a so-called inventor of FE has not been able to transmit his know-how, it is because he is a moron or a charlatan and that in fact, he has nothing at all. Instead of repeating professions of faith towards people and machines that would make free energy, provide the measurement protocol and measurements that would demonstrate FE, and the engineering plan that would allow to reproduce one. I am not the bigot of a sectarian movement, and will not become one no matter how much the FE gurus proselytize and manipulate the naive. I need a little more than gossip. We don't need children's stories, sophistries and cheap philosophy. We need facts and logic.
« Last Edit: 2022-09-14, 09:40:42 by F6FLT »
---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
|
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Principles of Operation (Read 10977 times)
