PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2024-11-26, 04:39:56
News: Forum TIP:
The SHOUT BOX deletes messages after 3 hours. It is NOT meant to have lengthy conversations in. Use the Chat feature instead.

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38
Author Topic: Don Smith Akula, Ruslan, Stalker, device discussion and replications.  (Read 47502 times)

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Instead of winding the grenade in the most conventional way thus; first two layers in one direction and others in another direction. Try this;

Layer1. CCW
Layer2. CCW
Layer3. CCW
Layer4. CW
Layer5. CW
Layer6. CCW

See where it resonates.

MHO

Maxolous

If your Grenade coil first Resonance resonates at 200KHZ is good

Maxolous
   

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4159
Ape,
Read carefully Items 5,6 and 7 of my post above of some selected statements about Device.

Maxolous

Hi Max,

the 6) and 7) items are OK with this new LOPT design from Ruslan, but as my experiment shows, the item 5) (the most important thing is to generate sharp impulses;) does not apply as we do not have any sharp impulses coming from this LOPT, just a static electric field, unless this LOPT is somehow pulsed or interrupted.

Itsu

   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
I would have expected the LOPT to output a high frequency waveform, not static DC. Sounds like something might be wrong with the LOPT or the way it's being driven.
   

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4159

Hmmmm,   yes i tend to agree, i will try some other LOPTs and drive it differently (not via its internal primary coil, but via an extra wound coil over its exposed ferrite).

Itsu
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
Quote
If you compare a television and a monitor flyback transformer, you will observe that the monitor flyback have an internal high voltage film capacitor built into it. Generally, television flyback do not have this internal capacitor.

from this thread at High Voltage forum.

What sort of LOPT transformer do you have? Does it have an internal cap?
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Hi Max,

the 6) and 7) items are OK with this new LOPT design from Ruslan, but as my experiment shows, the item 5) (the most important thing is to generate sharp impulses;) does not apply as we do not have any sharp impulses coming from this LOPT, just a static electric field, unless this LOPT is somehow pulsed or interrupted.

Itsu

Itsu,

It is expected you build your own Flyback using the core from LOPT wind both pry and sec to suit your purpose. That's when you can avoid the internal cap . Also you can pulse it the way you want it.

Maxolous
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
You can also just wind your own primary on the core and then use the existing secondary. Winding a flyback secondary would be quite a job.
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
You can also just wind your own primary on the core and then use the existing secondary. Winding a flyback secondary would be quite a job.

It would have been lot easier that way, but you need prompt response to your pulses by avoiding the cap embedded

Maxolous
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Infact,
Kapanadze wound his own high voltage transformer.

Maxolous
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
It's easy
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
There's going to be one winding on pry unlike flyback

Maxolous
   
Group: Guest
Wouldn't it be just as easy to buy a plasma ball and use the LOPT and circuit out of one of them just to experiment, the one i tried ran at 35khz same frequency Moray used into his spark gap.

So how does Ruslan get the phase shift out of the single wound LOPT ?

Sil
   

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4159
Guys, 


my LOPTs are television LOPTs, thus they would have no internal capacitor.


i am referring to this post from Maxolous here: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4219.msg110508#msg110508   2nd video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK5pOSgyvaw where can be seen (like at 1:27) this view of a LOPT:



As can be seen, this is a modern LOPT like i use and which is internally connected like this:



So no capacitor on the output because as i understand it, the CRT itself serves as a big capacitor.
But in this Ruslan device setup it looks to me that nothing is connected to the thick red output lead (going inside the grenade ending at the opposite site).


 
I retested with my same LOPT, but varied the duty cycle from the 50% to 1%, but the DC stayed, only got less en less.

Then i used another LOPT (bigger) and also used its internal primary but with the same result (7kV DC at 3.5V input)
Then i wound a 6 turn external primary (like the white one in the Ruslan device) and used this to switch it, but again with the same result, 6,8KV DC at 3.5V input, see picture and screenshot:





Also here when reducing the input duty cycle from 50% to 1% only reduces the DC level to almost zero
When putting the scope in AC coupling, i see this ripple on the 6.8KV DC:



So once again, according to my tests, such modern LOPT produces a static DC on its output (WHEN LOADED WITH A HV PROBE ONLY), so no sharp pulses are present, but once again, perhaps they somehow pulse this static DC / field.

Itsu
 
   
Group: Guest
Guys, 


my LOPTs are television LOPTs, thus they would have no internal capacitor.


i am referring to this post from Maxolous here: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4219.msg110508#msg110508   2nd video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK5pOSgyvaw where can be seen (like at 1:27) this view of a LOPT:



As can be seen, this is a modern LOPT like i use and which is internally connected like this:



So no capacitor on the output because as i understand it, the CRT itself serves as a big capacitor.
But in this Ruslan device setup it looks to me that nothing is connected to the thick red output lead (going inside the grenade ending at the opposite site).


 
I retested with my same LOPT, but varied the duty cycle from the 50% to 1%, but the DC stayed, only got less en less.

Then i used another LOPT (bigger) and also used its internal primary but with the same result (7kV DC at 3.5V input)
Then i wound a 6 turn external primary (like the white one in the Ruslan device) and used this to switch it, but again with the same result, 6,8KV DC at 3.5V input, see picture and screenshot:





Also here when reducing the input duty cycle from 50% to 1% only reduces the DC level to almost zero
When putting the scope in AC coupling, i see this ripple on the 6.8KV DC:



So once again, according to my tests, such modern LOPT produces a static DC on its output (WHEN LOADED WITH A HV PROBE ONLY), so no sharp pulses are present, but once again, perhaps they somehow pulse this static DC / field.

Itsu
Itsu Hi a few posts back is a Ruslan Video in it he shows a drawing have a good look at it and think how he gets that drawing like that !  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_ICLdvLy1M

The other thing is in Ruslans one pic om OU he used a spark gap, thats a frequency / phase changer I havent realy played with that idea E Grey and Aaron have and you need an io trap with that aparantly look at Morays valve for that.


 all the best mate.

Sil
« Last Edit: 2024-02-22, 00:20:02 by AlienGrey »
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Guys, 


my LOPTs are television LOPTs, thus they would have no internal capacitor.


i am referring to this post from Maxolous here: https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4219.msg110508#msg110508   2nd video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK5pOSgyvaw where can be seen (like at 1:27) this view of a LOPT:



As can be seen, this is a modern LOPT like i use and which is internally connected like this:



So no capacitor on the output because as i understand it, the CRT itself serves as a big capacitor.
But in this Ruslan device setup it looks to me that nothing is connected to the thick red output lead (going inside the grenade ending at the opposite site).


 
I retested with my same LOPT, but varied the duty cycle from the 50% to 1%, but the DC stayed, only got less en less.

Then i used another LOPT (bigger) and also used its internal primary but with the same result (7kV DC at 3.5V input)
Then i wound a 6 turn external primary (like the white one in the Ruslan device) and used this to switch it, but again with the same result, 6,8KV DC at 3.5V input, see picture and screenshot:





Also here when reducing the input duty cycle from 50% to 1% only reduces the DC level to almost zero
When putting the scope in AC coupling, i see this ripple on the 6.8KV DC:



So once again, according to my tests, such modern LOPT produces a static DC on its output (WHEN LOADED WITH A HV PROBE ONLY), so no sharp pulses are present, but once again, perhaps they somehow pulse this static DC / field.

Itsu

Itsu,

You got static DC , that could be right. If I got you correctly, you were looking for sharp pulses. Mind you,  you haven't seen the full circuit from Ruslan's Video
we should not conclude. So, don't think that there is no Spark gap somewhere. It could be in another form.  Anyway, he might have been pulsing the pry of flyback. It might interest you to know that when Don Smith or Nikola Tesla or Kapa had spark gap in their devices, they served as signal generators which produced the wanted frequencies for them as they varied the gaps. And also present the sharp pulses. Now we have two options, either with park gaps or pulse pry which is recommended. The later must go without internal cap for prompt response.

Maxolous
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Good for thought.
I found out that most problem we have in our devices are the problem of frequency response. A coil will not respond efficiently with it's resonance frequency to any pulse that hits it.

For a coil to efficiently respond with it's resonance frequency to input signal, the input signal must be the same as the Resonance frequency of the coil(fundamental) or harmonics. The harmonics could be in ratio of 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5.....1:50 and so forth.

Maxolous
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Don Smith said in one his videos concerning NST frequency. He was seen to be saying that the frequency of NST is not very important, that you could use even 50Hz NST. What I learnt there is that, whether 50Hz or 35kHz, you're at the end going to put series Diode and a parallel cap to get static DC. What's important there is DC volts and spark gap for tuning frequencies.

Maxolous
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 271
Don Smith said that the NST frequency didn't matter because it was just a means to charge up a capacitor which was then discharged through a spark gap. When the cap is discharged through a spark gap into the coil then the coil will ring at it's fundamental frequency. In this way an older iron core 60Hz NST can trigger a coil to ring at any frequency, similar to striking a bell with a hammer.

You can also replace the spark gap with a MOSFET / IGBT. They achieve the same thing - high dv/dt.
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
Don Smith said that the NST frequency didn't matter because it was just a means to charge up a capacitor which was then discharged through a spark gap.
Yeah! That's right


 When the cap is discharged through a spark gap into the coil then the coil will ring at it's fundamental frequency.
The coil continually rings in its  resonance frequency due to the sharp pulses produced by charge and discharge of // cap. Which rate is inversely proportional to gaps distance parts there creating frequency for the pulses. If this charge and discharge rate sync to fundamental or harmonics of resonance frequency of coil, there will be better response." The Q-factor".

In this way an older iron core 60Hz NST can trigger a coil to ring at any frequency, similar to striking a bell with a hammer.

You can also replace the spark gap with a MOSFET / IGBT. They achieve the same thing - high dv/dt.

Yes, MOSFET and IGBT are ways to achieving controlled trigger.

Maxolous
   

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4159
Itsu,

You got static DC , that could be right. If I got you correctly, you were looking for sharp pulses. Mind you,  you haven't seen the full circuit from Ruslan's Video
we should not conclude. So, don't think that there is no Spark gap somewhere. It could be in another form.  Anyway, he might have been pulsing the pry of flyback. It might interest you to know that when Don Smith or Nikola Tesla or Kapa had spark gap in their devices, they served as signal generators which produced the wanted frequencies for them as they varied the gaps. And also present the sharp pulses. Now we have two options, either with park gaps or pulse pry which is recommended. The later must go without internal cap for prompt response.

Maxolous


Max, 

It was you who pointed to some statement from GUNTIS/COSMOLVE that there should be sharp inpulses see statement 5) in your earlier post.
But i did expect to see some sharp unidirectional HV pulses coming from a LOPT, but obviously there are not.

You guys could always try it out for your self.
 

I agree about not having a full diagram, and the possibility of them "might have been pulsing the pry of flyback", thats why i ended my last post with:  "perhaps they somehow pulse this static DC / field."


Itsu
   

Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4159
After looking to all his video's, "lectures", demo's and replicating several of his "devices" (and with me many others) i noticed a lot of nonsense being spread around by Don Smith, so i consider him someone to not be taken very seriously, so any pointing to him or his devices are falling on deaf ears with me.

Itsu
   
Group: Guest
Itsu please notice this wave form but B wave is at minimum of 90deg thats the minimum.

OverUnity page 1 posted by Verpies please take note it's not a pulse it's a sine wave.  i wont post it as it might be copy protected.   https://overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/

A pulse does some thing else.
Regards Sil

   
Group: Guest
After looking to all his video's, "lectures", demo's and replicating several of his "devices" (and with me many others) i noticed a lot of nonsense being spread around by Don Smith, so i consider him someone to not be taken very seriously, so any pointing to him or his devices are falling on deaf ears with me.

Itsu
are you confusing Marconi wave with Tesla wave (oops it's not a wave).

Sil
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 389
I have this circuit i built here for experimenting
 :-*
https://everycircuit.com/circuit/5366712287100928.

Maxolous
   
Group: Guest
I have this circuit i built here for experimenting
 :-*
https://everycircuit.com/circuit/5366712287100928.

Maxolous
can you move the lower part of the wave to the left or right 90 deg so it cancels ?
   
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-11-26, 04:39:56