|
img Itsu
Re: Akula, Ruslan, Stalker, device discussion and replications. « Reply #502 on: 2023-08-14, 19:59:18 »
Group: Elite Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3823
Quote from: NickZ on 2023-08-14, 14:51:05
Itsu:
Why are you wanting to lock the frequency? Does your Kacher signal vary and needs that elaborate circuit to control that? As each of those components is hogging up a bit of the input power.
As I had mentioned, my Kacher is tuned to its best output, using a current transformer, and does not vary in frequency.
I am not blaming any body, just curious about the reason for the circuit.
Perhaps Verpies can try to post now, to see if he can. After Grum unlocked this thread.
Same with Ape, and anyone else.
Thanks Grum for looking into this. Most everyone was getting on my case about me locking them out.
NickZ
Edit:
The reason for placing the pulse in the PP Off time is due to there being less resistance at that point, for the interference circuit to do it's job. This was mentioned by Stalker, as you know, or remember him showing that scope shot that I posted a few times. No ones replication has shown that pulse. Which to me does look like what we need to have.
So, first I think we need to look for the proper interaction, which so far has not been found nor shown working, at all.
And, which without the yoke circuits and the rest of the device will be impossible to find. As the yoke is the heart of this set up. And it is what creates the strong pulses that excite the surrounding ambient, and allow extra energy back into the coils of the device, and out to the load. Without that interaction, no extra energy will be obtained. No matter how many electrons you try to "shake loose" using extreme additive high voltage pulses.
Like AG would say, "sorry to break your bubble". Or, something like that...
Even though many people have tried to show how these devices work, few understand what it takes. And none will actually show it self running, at this time. So it's up to us, now...
Nick,
it is not me that is wanting to lock the frequency of the kacher.
If you read the sequence of posts above, you will see that Max was mentioning that: "it is better for Tesla pace be determined by Push-pull than push-pull be determined by Tesla" (the latter being my 50:1 / PLL setup).
For his "it is better for Tesla pace be determined by Push-pull", he pointed to a diagram of a circuit doing just that, but that, in my opinion, only locked the kacher in frequency, but without any relationship to the push-pull frequency.
I eventually had to build that circuit to prove to him how it behaved.
Anyway, i will see if i can continue with my 50:1 divider / PLL to sync the push-pull to see if i can create the modulated kacher signal Max was showing earlier in this thread.
With the kacher and push-pull being locked to a 50:1 relationship it should be easier to do.
Itsu
|
Author
Topic: Don Smith Akula, Ruslan, Stalker, device discussion and replications. (Read 47459 times)
