Pages: 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104
« previous next »
Reply
Author Topic: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench (Read 75231 times)
Topic Options img
img solarlab Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2550 on: 2021-12-01, 02:51:35 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
====================================================
Quote from: verpies on 2021-12-01, 02:44:38
Even if you gave me the example dimensions and distances to these targets, it would be a very difficult question to answer.
3.73keV is three orders of magnitude larger than the ionization potentials of air molecules and air consists of several types of gasses.
Take a look at this experiment:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Franck-Hertz-Neon-3.png It is complicated enough at only 16eV and with only one type of gas at very low pressure.
In vacuum, I could make some rough estimates but I'd have to know at least the charge carrier density in the questioned space or the type and temperature of the electron emitter.
In air at atmoshperic pressure, I would also need to know the type of discharge (Townsend, glow, arc).
The secondary ion avalanche products and additional phenomena which would occur in air at 3.73keV are incalculable.
No problem, on either item. Gizmo - I'll wind one and measure it or simulate it seperate from the system.
For the HV - assume eV is at 3.73kV leaving the cathode and entering the chamber, so to speak. Sort of like one of those Tesla plasma globes or Tesla transformer toys you see on Amazon but without the corona.
OK, I was thinking something like in the MIT video - in this case, send an electron burst a few mm (speed doesn't change once the eV has set the velocity). In vacuum at least, there's no energy change during the time of flight.
Thanks,
Look at it this way - narrow HV pulses do not ionize (corona) but do contain energy (and a related velocity) which is, in turn, based on the level of induced potential (Katcher). This is used in all Stalker, et. al. generators and for the most part they don't spark (or you don't want them to) unless you put a differing potential near the parts (coil, antenna, etc.) like your screw driver.
Stalker, according to his descriptions and demonstrations, claims the HV threshold is about 3.73kV; others like Don Smith use near 20kV.
Anyway, these are proven simple observations - no Townsend avalench glow or arc - just energy created by HV pulses. Observed facts. Can't think of any other way to describe it to you, sorry.
SL
=============================================
img verpies Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2551 on: 2021-12-01, 03:10:47 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: solarlab on 2021-12-01, 02:51:35
OK, I was thinking something like in the MIT video - in this case, send an electron burst a few mm (speed doesn't change once the eV has set the velocity). In vacuum at least, there's no energy change during the time of flight.
My vacuum chamber is 30cm
Most other members of this forum cannot deal with any kind of vacuum at all.
I think it would be easier and cheaper to measure the speed of the Townsend avalanche in air at atmospheric pressure using two charged metal plates/spheres and a dermatological picosecond laser to generate the well timed initial ionization event. The delay between the light picopulse and the resulting rising edge of the electric current is well within the capabilities of contemporary oscilloscopes.
When new, these lasers can generate a 1 Joule light pulse that is 300 picoseconds wide but they cost arm and a leg.
However, when they become worn out, they still can generate picosecond pulses but only at milli Joule levels and then they become available on eBay almost for free.
These worn-out lasers are still good enough to generate a well timed initial ionization event in air for such measurements.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Electron_avalanche.gif=====================================================
img solarlab
Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2552 on: 2021-12-01, 03:19:51 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
Quote from: verpies on 2021-12-01, 03:10:47
My vacuum chamber is 30cm
Most other members of this forum cannot deal with any kind of vacuum at all.
I think it would be easier and cheaper to measure the speed of the Townsend avalanche in air at atmospheric pressure using two charged metal plates/spheres and a dermatological picosecond laser to generate the well timed initial ionization event. The delay between the light picopulse and the resulting rising edge of the electric current is well within the capabilities of contemporary oscilloscopes.
When new, these lasers can generate a 1 Joule light pulse that is 300 picoseconds wide but they cost arm and a leg.
However, when they become worn out, they still can generate picosecond pulses but only at milli Joule levels and then they become available on eBay almost for free.
These lasers are still good enough to generate a well timed initial ionization event in air.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Electron_avalanche.gifLook at it this way - narrow HV pulses do not ionize (corona) but do contain energy (and a related velocity) which is, in turn, based on the level of induced potential (Katcher). This is used in all Stalker, et. al. generators and for the most part they don't spark (or you don't want them to) unless you put a differing potential near the parts (coil, antenna, etc.) like your screw driver.
Stalker, according to his descriptions and demonstrations, claims the HV threshold is about 3.73kV; others like Don Smith use near 20kV.
Anyway, these are proven simple observations - no Townsend avalench glow or arc - just energy created by HV pulses. Observed facts. Can't think of any other way to describe it to you, sorry.
SL
============================================
img verpies Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2553 on: 2021-12-01, 03:27:37 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: solarlab on 2021-12-01, 03:19:51
Look at it this way - narrow HV pulses do not ionize (corona) but do contain energy (and a related velocity) which is, in turn, based on the level of induced potential (Katcher).
Ionization does not have to result in visible glow. Ionized molecules/atoms and electrons do not have to travel for centimetres to be qualified as ionized particles.
1) The "related velocity' you are mentioning refers to the velocity of electrons, doesn't it ?
2) These electrons come from the air molecules, don't they ? Or do you agree with Smudge's principle.
If you answered "yes" to these two questions, then the removal of electrons from air molecules/atoms (even for 11 nanoseconds) is the very definition of ionization.
What happens to the electrons after they are stripped out or knocked out of atoms is a whole different story.
I don't deny that they do get accelerated by the applied HV potential as soon as they get separated from the molecules/atoms.
...but that is not the end of their journey, e.g.: see this.
====================================================
img solarlab [/glow]
Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2554 on: 2021-12-01, 04:04:08 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
Quote from: verpies on 2021-12-01, 03:27:37
Ionization does not have to result in visible glow. Ionized molecules/atoms and electrons do not have to travel for centimetres to be qualified as ionized particles.
1) The "related velocity' you are mentioning refers to the velocity of electrons, doesn't it ?
2) These electrons come from the air molecules, don't they ? Or do you agree with Smudge's principle.
If you answered "yes" to these two questions, then the removal of electrons from air molecules/atoms (even for 11 nanoseconds) is the very definition of ionization.
What happens to the electrons after they are stripped out or knocked out of atoms is a whole different story.
I don't deny that they do get accelerated by the applied HV potential as soon as they get separated from the molecules/atoms.
...but that is not the end of their journey, e.g.: see this.
1. Ok, you got that part right - electrons, not potatoes.
2. these electrons can come from anything - atoms contain electrons, molecules contain atoms, molecules make up a lot of stuff, everything maybe.
- air is composed of gasses, yes; and electrons can ionize, correct you are.
- and yes, electrons are mobile, some more than others and they can be coerced to be even more mobile in a nubmer of ways using a variety of methods.
- what happens to electrons knocked out of atoms is a different story - or they just might join another atom or they can do an infinite number of things.
- or we can herd them into doing what we want them to do
- you don't deny HV accelerates electrons because that's a proven fact - there's no rocket science involved in that conclusion, an accepted fact.
- so now we have defined ionization, or have we - but HV pulses still influence electrons
- so that was enlightening
- or was it just nattering in mindless circles (?)
What a massive waste of valuable time - nothing more!
========================================================
img verpies Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2555 on: 2021-12-01, 04:19:15 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: solarlab on 2021-12-01, 04:04:08
so now we have defined ionization, or have we - but HV pulses still influence electrons
Yes and not only pulses but constant voltages, too.
However, the most important take away from this is the observation that HV influences electrons, which are separated from atoms, much differently than electrons which are bound to atoms.
As a side note, I'd like to add that an electron in a 10kV discharge which is not bound to an atom survives for only 680nm in STP air on average, before it is recaptured by one of the air molecules.
See: mean free path and Fig.10 in the attached article.
Quote from: solarlab on 2021-12-01, 04:04:08
What a massive waste of valuable time - nothing more!
Not at all. Agreeing on definitions is the basis of coherent communication.
------------------------
* Electrons MFP in Air.pdf (1454.82 kB - downloaded 11 times.)
====================================================
img Centraflow Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2556 on: 2021-12-01, 08:03:42 »
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2457
Buy me a beer
Quote from: verpies on 2021-12-01, 03:27:37
Ionization does not have to result in visible glow. Ionized molecules/atoms and electrons do not have to travel for centimetres to be qualified as ionized particles.
1) The "related velocity' you are mentioning refers to the velocity of electrons, doesn't it ?
2) These electrons come from the air molecules, don't they ? Or do you agree with Smudge's principle.
If you answered "yes" to these two questions, then the removal of electrons from air molecules/atoms (even for 11 nanoseconds) is the very definition of ionization.
What happens to the electrons after they are stripped out or knocked out of atoms is a whole different story.
I don't deny that they do get accelerated by the applied HV potential as soon as they get separated from the molecules/atoms.
...but that is not the end of their journey, e.g.: see this.
Well said
Regards
Mike
---------------------------
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860
As a general rule, the most successful person in life is the person that has the best information.
==========================================================
img solarlab Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2557 on: 2021-12-01, 08:55:16 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
Quote from: verpies on 2021-12-01, 04:19:15
Yes and not only pulses but constant voltages, too.
However, the most important take away from this is the observation that HV influences electrons, which are separated from atoms, much differently than electrons which are bound to atoms.
As a side note, I'd like to add that an electron in a 10kV discharge which is not bound to an atom survives for only 680nm in STP air on average, before it is recaptured by one of the air molecules.
See: mean free path and Fig.10 in the attached article.
Not at all. Agreeing on definitions is the basis of coherent communication.
Yea, yur damn right partner - no way it'll survive past 680nm ... (wikipedia certified) and my Grade 8 Physics Professor just confirmed that!
Well said... [oh no, a rare burst of humour]
------------------------
teslaphoto1.jpg
* teslaphoto1.jpg (82.52 kB, 1189x795 - viewed 390 times.)
====================================================
img forest Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2558 on: 2021-12-01, 09:39:41 »
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 342
Do you think it's about ionizatioon of air to produce electrons ? Hmm... I disagree. Electrons ionized by power source and speed up by power source cannot have more energy then applied by power source. Think about it. Steven Mark said something interesting about various currents in the same circuits having different sources. They are mostly independent.
===================================================
img verpies Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2559 on: 2021-12-01, 10:38:38 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: solarlab on 2021-12-01, 08:55:16
Yea, yur damn right partner - no way it'll survive past 680nm ... (wikipedia certified) and my Grade 8 Physics Professor just confirmed that!
The arcs and streamers in air from the Tesla coil (of which photo you posted) survive much longer than 680nm and the lightning during a thunderstorm survives even longer.
However, just like a chain, these phenomena consist of multiple short emission and absorption events, thus they do not constitute an evidence that contradicts the mean free path being well below 1mm.
This is illustrated below where the distances marked in blue color are much smaller than the collective distance marked in green color.
======================================================
img verpies Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2560 on: 2021-12-01, 12:43:01 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: forest on 2021-12-01, 09:39:41
Do you think it's about ionization of air to produce electrons ?
I am not adamant about it. I am just following the line of reasoning about the operational principle proposed in this thread.
The fact is that anytime we talk about electrons travelling through air, we must consider the impact that these elections have on the air molecules (and vice versa). This inescapably leads to the consideration of inelastic collisions of electrons with air molecules and their ionization.
There are other sources of free electrons, e.g.: a heated metal cathode or photoelectric effect, however electrons emitted from such sources are localized and get absorbed by air within micrometers of such emitters and if they do not cause secondary electron emissions from the air molecules, then the kinetic energy carried by them gets absorbed, too, ...and the entire process comes to a halt.
Quote from: forest on 2021-12-01, 09:39:41
Electrons ionized by power source and speed up by power source cannot have more energy then applied by power source. Think about it.
I agree with that.
I think what is being proposed here is an unnamed secondary process which is activated by these accelerated electrons ...and which adds energy to them somehow.
I am not the author of the idea, so don't ask me what it is. Maybe that unnamed secondary process is based on something similar to this ?
P.S.
Smudge has a similar idea based on electrons pulled out of metal surface by high electric potential difference. It is worth considering..
=====================================================
img forest Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2561 on: 2021-12-01, 16:56:56 »
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 342
It's obvious there is external energy source and the only candidate is Earth or rather Sun radiation with the help of Earth. In fact we all sense it has to be - there is no other source around. Everybody wants someone to jump in the discussion and explain all. This will not happen.
====================================================
img verpies Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2562 on: 2021-12-01, 17:12:00 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: forest on 2021-12-01, 16:56:56
It's obvious there is external energy source and the only candidate is Earth or rather Sun radiation with the help of Earth. In fact we all sense it has to be - there is no other source around.
But there is a whole lot of matter that is closer than Sun or Earth and all matter is equivalent to energy. Remember e=mc2
img solarlab
Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2563 on: 2021-12-01, 17:45:31 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
IMHO - based on a lot of forum reply observations
This is just an observed "In My Humble Opinion" regarding most replies to my rather important discovery, nit picky or otherwise: (not in any particular order)
- Using an VNA to sweep filters or whatever - GOOD, but presenting the data in Nepers (-j), the Telephone Equation, USELESS. Proper technique is Gain in dB and Phase in degrees plus all four S Parameters are needed to complete the picture of device behavour.
- Determining Joules and Coulombs in an electron stream, simple:
v^2 = 2 Ek/m where v is velocity in 10^8 M/sec and Ek is kinetic energy source in eV
so, source V in eV/e which is V in Joules/Coulomb
The Ultimate Speed - An Exploration with High Energy Electrons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA - Quoting Wikipedia articles in a technical discussion of any sort is a dead ringer, no technically competent engineer would ever risk doing that (Wiki is a hodge podge of disconnected dribble, is not vetted, and is more often than not incorrect or incomplete - this is well known). It's a stop-gap, at best, when you need to bail yourself out - but this is well known also. You can get ripped big time for such stupid stunts.
- word games like Atom and Electron, air and gasses, Townsend glow arc avalanche, ionization, etc.. and silly things like my vacuum chamber or most members of this forum cannot. Recall the Grade 8 Physics rhym "one Atom to another Atom - let's share some electrons so we can ionize."
- the list is long... Some of us realize this is NOT a game and LARPing is nothing more than a waist of time.
- "3. dv/dt," Try addressing this one. It's also very important in the operation this system. Employ your analytical skill set and come up with some of your own postulations. We're all waiting!
And YES, I have a big problem dealing with ignorance or stupidity, especially when it maskerades as "I'm cool, see my super scientific replies."
I'm not the least bit interested in "agreeing on definitions" nor "coherent communication."
--------------------
Like I've said " I have detailed a viable postulation that answers both these questions with accompanying theory and support papers, etc.."
1. Where does the excess energy come from?
2. How does this excess energy couple into a system like the Kapanadze or Ruslan scheme?
And I have detailed a viable postulation that answers both these questions with accompanying theory and support papers, etc..
3. "dv/dt"
There's a third (3.) topic involved in the operation of "Stalker/Ruslan/Kapanzdze" devices that is worthy of further discussion and is required to fully complete our theoretical postulation.
Take it or leave it - I don't really care.
----------------
Discussion CLOSED for me at least!
Now, back to my dv/dt analysis...
SL
===================================================
img Vasik041 Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2564 on: 2021-12-01, 17:48:08 »
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 749
Just in case somebody still want do something...
Here an experiment description how to measure ground wire frequency, how to match LC and wave resonance in gradient coil etc.
As you may be remember, we attempted something similar at the beginning, but it wasn't exactly clear how to do it at that time.
Have fun,
Vasik
------------------------
* ground.pdf (298.69 kB - downloaded 25 times.)
---------------------------
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
===============================================================
img AlienGrey
Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2565 on: 2021-12-01, 18:54:23 »
Group: Moderator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 231
Enjoy your trek through life but leave no tracks
Vasik hi, to answere your question, yes
so what is the blue & yellow trace relating to ? is it a Rigol blue and yellow scope inputs by any chance ?
any more instructions only no sub titles
Sil
PS no one else is going to ask
On an old coil i have i get this >
------------------------
DS1Z_QuickPrint1.png
* DS1Z_QuickPrint1.png (88.93 kB, 800x480 - viewed 13 times.)
« Last Edit: 2021-12-01, 20:47:22 by AlienGrey »
================================================
img Vasik041 Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2566 on: 2021-12-01, 19:33:21 »
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 749
Quote from: AlienGrey on 2021-12-01, 18:54:23
Vasik hi, to answere your question, yes
so what is the blue trace relating to ?
and what does the yellow trace relate to ?
any more instructions only no sub titles
Sil
PSno one else is going to ask
------------------------
sch.jpg
* sch.jpg (40.68 kB, 796x350 - viewed 37 times.)
---------------------------
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
======================================================
img Maxolous Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2567 on: 2021-12-01, 21:08:44 »
Full Member
***
Posts: 162
If any must achieve interaction in this device in a proper way and if especially you are using nano-pulser, you should put into consideration that during shifting and pulse widthing of Tesla coil signal that you have caused delay. Sometime was taken to charge those caps. Consequently, Tesla would arrive late on the scene.
In order to compensate for this, push-pull must be delayed also so that you don't make pulses at the wrong time.
Regards.
Maxolous.
img verpies
Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2568 on: 2021-12-02, 22:21:07 »
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2602
Quote from: solarlab on 2021-12-01, 17:45:31
I'm not the least bit interested in "agreeing on definitions" nor "coherent communication".
That is a helluva thing to admit on a scientific forum.
If you are not interested in coherent discourse, then why did you come here ?
@All
What do you think ?
====================================================
img NickZ Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2569 on: 2021-12-02, 22:35:50 »
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 348
He was just bored....nothing better to do. And wanted to rile you up, with his post and paste theories.
Which as you know neither you nor he,
will build anything to prove his views, nor yours
Perhaps, he (or the "we"), that didn't get what they expected...and are here for more...
NickZ
« Last Edit: 2021-12-03, 02:09:29 by NickZ »
img muDped Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2570 on: 2021-12-02, 23:17:03 »
Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3047
Quote from: SolarLab
I'm not the least bit interested in "agreeing on definitions" nor "coherent communication".
Quote from: Verpies
That is a helluva thing to admit on a scientific forum.
If you are not interested in coherent discourse, then why did you come here ?
@All
What do you think ?
He came to tickle your fancy?
Or, perhaps he came to add to the discussion with what many would consider to be "unorthodox" ideas?
To stimulate questions and thought?
To reveal some little known "Secrets" for consideration and cogitation?
I, personally, rather like what SolarLab has presented and his style of presentation.
Bon appetit!
---------------------------
For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.
=====================================================
img solarlab Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2571 on: 2021-12-03, 00:07:21 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
Quote from: verpies on 2021-12-02, 22:21:07
That is a helluva thing to admit on a scientific forum.
If you are not interested in coherent discourse, then why did you come here ?
@All
What do you think ?
First you said "coherent communication" which now twists to "coherent discourse"
All, what do you think? WTH - is this Fakebook or whatever?
SUMMARY - Take it or leave it - I don't really care. I'll blow this part up a bit for you - might be easier for you to read!
I came to this forum {Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench} only to share two very important findings.
These two questions have appeared time and again in excess energy discussions as far back as the subject itself.
1. Where does the excess energy come from?
2. How does this excess energy couple into a system like the Kapanadze or Ruslan scheme?
And I have detailed a viable postulation that answers both these questions with accompanying theory and support papers, etc..
That's it - my simple mission so to speak!
Of course, along the way, I have provided some other directly related, valuable, information as well. (review my posts)
On the 11th of November 2021 I posted (Reply #2374) the following:
Notable is the Katcher pulse burst timing with respect to the Grenade Coil (GC) signal. The concept is different from the electron bunching found in a TWT but, I believe, the mechanism (Velocity Modulation) is similar.
In simple terms:
- a signal propagates through the GC, signal wavefront speed is set by the signal frequency (phase),
- but must be slowed down by the Slow Wave Structure (SWS) of the GC helical coil,
- normally the GC signal wavefront would propagate at near the speed of light (C or 3x108 m/s),
- the GC signal wavefront must be slowed to match the speed of the Electron pulse burst created by the Katcher,
- Electron pulse burst speed is set by the Katcher voltage [recall e = mc2] where e=energy, m=electron mass,
- and c=speed of light, but in this case the velocity is v2 set by the Katcher high voltage, the square part is bonus,
- now, when the signal wavefron and the electron speed nearly match, energy is transfered to the signal,
- the "free energy" is realized by the v2 term (e = mv2), high voltage sets the v term which is squared,
- energy transfer mechanism is clearly provided and proven in the Traveling Wave Tube analysis and operation.
Essentially there are three (3) variables we control and one (1) consideration;
- Slow Wave Structure (SWS), our grenade coil, including pitch and length (transaction time) ;
- Signal Frequency on the Grenade Coil, which sets the signal wavefront speed along with the SWS;
- Electron propagation speed or velocity, determined by the Voltage set by the Katcher or TT;
- Physical placement of the components need to match a viable layout for the interactions to occur.
Notable references/proofs to 1. and 2. above include:
- "The Ultimate Speed - An Exploration with High Energy Electrons," an MIT video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA - "Q&A The theory of the origin of SE or where it came from" - a Stalker video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syf5_fLPzrw&list=PLRYhzUMB2BkLXLVDOUIhc1TU-ZTq1WvPT&index=92 - Numerous Traveling Wave Tube - Velocity Modulation papers, patents, references and so forth.
- Simplified functional schematics
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4154.msg96060#msg96060So, in conclusion I will declare the mission is accomplished.
Since there appears to be very few of us still involved in this endevour, we need to double the effort, perfect these systems and spread the technology.
Take care, stay safe and may luck be with you.
SL
=======================================================
img solarlab Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2572 on: 2021-12-03, 01:02:02 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
FYI
Electrons in air:
TABLES OF ENERGY LOSSES AND RANGES OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS
NASA SP-3012 1964
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19650002905Taken from chart line MEV 0350 - page 124 "ELECTRONS IN AIR"
ENERGY COLLISION STOPPING POWER TOTAL RANGE RADIATION
RADIATION YIELD
MEV MEV CM2/G MEV CM2/G MEV CM2/G G/CM2
0.350 1.975E 00 8.161E -03 1.984E 00 1.200E -01 2.210E -03
Chart values range from MEV 0.010 to MEV 800.000 and covers a large variety of materials/environments.
From the text: "At high energies, one cannot treat the electrons or positrons by themselves, but must simultaneously take into account the transport of associated bremsstrahlung and annihilation radiation and consider, in turn, the pair or Compton electrons produced by photons. All these processes can be described only by rather complicated transport theory." ... "Neverless, there are justifications for tabulating such crude parameters as the mean energy loss and range."
An interesting postulation regarding the "Energy Transfer" mechanism:
An Explanation of the Interactions between Waves and Electrons: Discussion of Electromagnetic Fields
Weiye Xu - Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
https://osf.io/8wste/downloadNote: chart lines don't line up properly here - see the document.
SL
===================================================
img solarlabRe: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2573 on: 2021-12-03, 01:45:48 »
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 76
Quote from: NickZ on 2021-12-02, 22:35:50
He was just bored....nothing better to do. And wanted to rile you up, with his post and paste theories.
Which as you know neither you nor he,
will build anything to prove his views, nor yours
Perhaps, he (or the "we"), that didn't get what they expected...and are here for more...
NickZ
Nick,
Back in 2015/16 time frame we built several devices following as best we could Ruslans design. They didn't work, for the most part, but more troubling was the fact several more attempts at replication turned out like many others; they didn't work!
Have you managed to make this type of system work? Your development or possibly following Stalkers "cookbook," or some other design.
Stalker's recent "cookbook" is an excellent resource - the best one out there as far as I know! A great analysis model as well.
After a long period of collecting the necessary resources, etc. I began the long, somewhat challenging, task of "Reverse Engineering" this type of system in hopes of figuring out how it worked, exactly. After lots of side-tracks and investigations, I, like everone else, still didn't know the answers to the key questions.
First (1.) Where does the energy come from, and after coming up with a viable theory for that, another question arose (2.) How does this new found source (e=mc^2) couple into the system. Took a lot of thought and study to solve this one as well.
So that's where I'm at right now. I will not wind any more coils until the theory and approach to design are completed and documented. No more blind alleys at great expense of time and money. When it works on paper and the CAE simulations yield good results; then the winding will begin.
Having known better than to try and copy something without knowing how it works in detail; I made the mistake of thinking (like many) this thing is a "piece of cake." Turns out it's not..
Winding coils and soldering circuits, for me at least, is not designing, developing, documenting and fabricating a system. Learned my lesson!
Once the (3.) dv/dt analysis yields satisfactory results; the wind will begin. But this time I'll know, hopefully, exactly what I'm doing and how to do it so that it works properly and is reproducable. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like I'm going to get much value-add from this forum thread with developing (3.) either; - or maybe I'm just too nasty or demanding. One liner comments, unsubstantiated look here - look there stuff and wild goose chases are "not" value-add - oh well!
SL
=====================================================
img NickZ Re: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench « Reply #2574 on: 2021-12-03, 02:15:19 »
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 348
Yeah, and so did his backers...
You don't just come here throwing theories around and expect some one to believe you. Or does that not matter?
You mention "we", should we care who "we" are?
Sorry to hear that (we) could not get it to work.
So that makes you all FE experts, now?
Why are you here, then...makes me wonder...
NickZ
Author
Topic: None technical none related posts. (Read 3978 times)
