author=picowatt link=topic=4082.msg88330#msg88330 date=1614364894]
suippets...
Where I lose respect for you is when you do not apply those same critical thinking skills of "Brad the scientist" or "Brad the experimentalist" to your "its all fakery and lies" beliefs.
You present what you believe to be proof of fakery and lies, but when presented with any alternatives and benign explanations, you refuse to see it, move the goalposts with another what-a-boutism, or don't even acknowledge those other possibilities. Its a belief within you, and no amount of evidence to the contrary will ever change your mind.
Yes, I always go for the low hanging fruit. Why? Because that stuff is easy. Just like you don't waste your time actually investigating or looking for alternate explanations, I am not going to waste my time contacting people and investigating conspiracy theories when alternate and benign explanations are easily surmised and probably more likely. But then, just like the very brief explanation regarding video compression, you will just blow any alternatives and move on. Nothing changes. Nothing causes you take pause and think "if that evidence I presented was easily explained, perhaps I should look at my other evidence with a bit more criticality". Instead, its either move on to something else or believe what you want to believe anyway.
I watched the videos...
I see nothing that hints at, or provides evidence of, any form of green screen usage in the first video. As well, the data presented in the second video, with respect to the encoded grid pattern backdrop, is inconsistent with what is seen in the first video. The grid pattern hanging behind Tim is quite regular, and its use as a green screen would be more difficult owing to the waviness as it hangs and the inconsistent lighting from edge to edge.
As I watched the first video above, my very first impression was that a blue backdrop with a white grid was hanging behind Tim Peake as he did his science classroom video series, so that the classrooms watching were better able to see the movement of objects in his microgravity demonstrations.
You on the other hand see the use of some sort of green screen technology being used to perpetrate a great hoax upon humanity involving a multinational conspiracy.
It's like a belief driven form of pareidolia whereby you only allow your mind to see what you want to believe you see.
I, on the other hand, actually weigh both possibilities. So let's see, is it a simple backdrop placed for classroom experiments, or a green screen of some sort, like none I have ever seen, being used to pull off one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated by a multi-national group of conspirators?
Given those two possibilities, and using Occam's razor, I'll go with the "backdrop for classroom experiments" as the most likely explanation. Sure, I could be wrong, so I also assign odds, because having an open mind requires allowing for the possibility that I may be wrong. In this case I'll go with something in the 90+ percent range with that being a backdrop for classrooms, because nothing provided is "evidentiary" to the contrary within a scientific, or even legal, sense of the term.
I have indeed looked at all your videos. I see nothing that indicates or proves any sort of deception. Just like the backdrop hanging behind Tim Peake, or the compression/dropout artifacts, I could provide you with benign explanations for all of those videos. But it would be a waste of time. You will believe none of it. Even more, you will not actually take the time to investigate any of them yourself with any kind of scientific or legal rigor.
So that is it.
How much more proof do you need?
What on earth did the astronot grab and put on the shelf--there was nothing there,and the other guy still had hold of the hat. This is the blindness i was talking about-you refuse to see,even though it is clearly shown in the video. And what of the very clear cable grabbing by one astronot to steady the other astronot after performing a somersault ?--nothing there either. And then the third video showing an astronot flying from left to right in the background where it is clearly seen that he is wearing a harness and leg straps--what about that.
And what about the womens hair on the ISS.
I carried out the scientific method you so much want,by comparing the womens ISS hair with that of women on the vomit comet with the very same type of hair.
I posted 3 video's showing how both long and curly hair actually looks and moves in 0G while on the vomit comet,and then 3 video's showing how both long and curly hair looks and moves in NASA's ISS video's.
The two are vastly different,and NASA's ISS hair video's in no way resemble how hair actually looks and moves in a 0G environment. You know as well as i do that hair just does not stand straight up and remain in a fixed position to that of the head when the women move there heads. They clearly have a shit load of hair gel in there hair,as it's stiffer than a 3 day old corps.
That is the scientific method used for that point alone,but no mention from you on it at all.
I also used the scientific method when it came to being able to see stars from both space and the surface of the moon,and explained why the apollo 11 crew lied when they said they couldn't see any stars at all.
I also posted 2 video's of some NASA astronots saying you cant see stars from space or from the moon,and some saying you can-even in the middle of the day,with the sun shining bright.
Are you going to refute that some how?
If there are those in NASA that clearly lie about one thing,then they are clearly capable of lying about many things.
As i said,you only explain what can be explained,and leave the rest untouched.
That is completely false and way more than just misleading. Mark and I (and others for sure) assisted you with how to be certain your measurements were accurate, and once you made those measurements (using well filtered DC). both he and I were in agreement that barring any shenanigans or unaccounted for connections or circuit paths, your results were indeed consistent with achieving overunity. How you go from that to some paranoid driven belief that we were trying to "trap you" is beyond me and, frankly, borderline psychotic. I had a good deal of faith in both you and what you were doing. Find a single post where I did not. In fact, I believe you will find a post wherein I even had Mark having to admit the same thing, that barring any shenanigans or unaccounted for circuit paths, your results were consistent with overunity. So how is it we were in any way being negative?
Oh please. Why you try so hard to discredit some one when they begin to present evidence that go's against your !need to believe! hoaxes is really sad.
What made your RT a fiasco was that you suddenly "pulled a Mylow", so to speak, complete with MIB, and went dark all of a sudden. Sure, the thread moved over here, but there was both a "with Brad" and "without Brad" thread running over here, and I wanted no part of any "talking behind someone's back" , so I just moved on. Check my join date and posting history over here, it is consistent with the above statements.
Ah,there you go again.
So there was a !without! Brad thread here was there ?
I will have to ask Chet about that,as that is something i would like,actually,need to know about,due to what is taking place ATM.
You might also like to talk to Chet about the !MIB! thing as you put it.
There was another lovely little well known person involved in the drama,and he is part reason it was halted,and the cause of Chet loosing one of his computers. There is much more to the story than you realize,but you feel you have the right to pass judgement.
You call it a conspiracy because you believe what you need to believe.
I call it a hoax,as the evidence clearly shows it to be one.
But it will be never ending,as you only choose to look at what you can clearly explain,and go no where near anything that you cannot.
But i do thank you for letting me know about the !without Brad! thread,as i need to look into that,and make sure the crew i have chosen are all on my side.
Brad
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
Author
Topic: Deceptions of NASA (Read 17072 times)
