MH
Thank you for not taking offense at my post although it could have been offensive.
My stance is this: I don't have the desire to spoon feed anyone about the TPU. The amount of information that was shared on at least three other forums, and one underground group was enormous. A lot of bright, savvy engineers and techs covered every angle you could imagine and spent nearly five years in the process.
We tried every imaginable way to debunk the information and videos, frame by frame analysis, video restoration, scrutinizing all of the available information with a fine tooth comb. Hidden battery theories and analysis etc.
There are many ways some of the devices could have been faked. Some, however were way more difficult to fake, but not impossible.
I would like to give up on the TPU but of all the devices ever presented, it has haunting incongruities that do not sit well with an outright rejection. I have tried to get away from it but cannot reconcile a few things.
Excuse me if I get a bit edgy when a newcomer has an instant analysis. I can only suggest one start with the first few pages of this thread. That is the tip of a giant iceberg, but there is so much more. You will not find it on the internet anymore, it has been buried.
Possibly some of us have it archived and can share it, but you have to have the taste for it, a few hundred hours to spend, and an open mind (but not so open that your brains have rattled out).
If it was a scam, it certainly did not seem to start that way, and some quirk of SM's personality veered him from his original work, the work which which seemed to greatly interest Dr. Schinzinger
I discount many here, GK included, that talk with apparent knowledge and authority of what made the TPU tick. Many talk in circles or just like to hear themselves espouse their latest theory. They know little and have not delivered the repeatable definitive experimental proof of concept. Just talk talk talk. Empty, practically undecipherable rhetoric with all the buzzwords and cryptic inuendo.
edit: sorry for the shot GK, but you need to improve your communication skills.
This is not the language of engineering or how engineers communicate information. They do it with clearly drawn schematics and text that clearly defines every working aspect of the schematic including timing diagrams and data.
Successful projects, even where there are great unknowns, like the Manhatten Project, have project leaders and designers that pool the best minds into groups where their unique talents are harnessed to the goals accomplishment. Forums are more like a Keystone Kops fire drill.
I am pretty much fed up with the talkers, but I guess that's what forums are for, where the biggest ego's can shine like those lightbulbs they try to light.
« Last Edit: 2011-09-06, 15:35:39 by ION »
---------------------------
"Secrecy, secret societies and secret groups have always been repugnant to a free and open society"......John F Kennedy
|