We are operating under the assumption that the devices perform as advertised,
Yes while allowing for the possibility of the alternative.
With that as a given, we need to find a possible gain mechanism or source of energy that the device taps into.
Yes, in order to optimize the construction of this device for this mechanism.
This mechanism can be:
- material (baryonic matter)
- immaterial (leptons, photons)
- other...*
In case of the 1
st possibility, the matter where the mechanism takes place is called the "gain medium", just like a ruby crystal in a laser is its "gain medium".
I do not doubt that just about anywhere one probes throughout this circuit that a neon will light.
I hope you are not conflating:
lighting a neon bulb between the circuit and earth/ground or operator's hand
vs.
lighting a neon bulb between two circuit elements.
I think that lighting a neon bulb between L2 and L3 qualifies as the latter and constitutes proof that the yoke is routinely subjected to HF E-field in this device.
Also, note that in my question I asked if you have any doubts that the yoke is subjected to
both the HF E-field AND H-fields. I still do not know whether you have any.
This HF ringing we would normally snub, but these pulses are apparently high enough in frequency, and voltage, to cap couple to just about everywhere in the yoke circuit (even on the surface of the wire insulation).
So you do have doubts that the energy which creates the difference in electric potential between L2 and L3 originates at the Kacher.
This begs for an experiment which checks whether the neon bulb between the L2 and L3 lights up with the Kacher disabled and PP enabled.
Again, that said, I do not doubt that the TC also cap couples to the entire circuit as well.
Perhaps, but cap coupling wrt to ground is not the same as creating an electric potential difference between two elements of the circuit.
Most importantly, not all parts of this circuit have
both the HF differential electric potential and H-field delivered to them so deliberately.
That Itsu was able to light a neon (having to break insulation to do so) is apparently significant to you in that you feel this is affecting/influencing the core of the yoke in some manner.
Yes, my thesis is that the material of the yoke is the gain medium and it is a central component of the entire device - everything else being auxiliary.
Perhaps driving it into saturation or combining with the HF ringing of the PWM driver pulse.
These are well known effects that have not been observed to provide energy gain in conventional circuits.
Are you proposing this HF influence on the yoke is somehow a gain mechanism or source of energy that allows the device to perform as advertised?
Yes, the specific geometric orientation of the HF E-field and HF H-field and the LF H-field.
If so, can you offer more insight with regard to that concept?
I could but only privately. Doing so publicly in detail would derail this thread.
I already gave you a hint in my previous posts that subjecting certain ferrites to an electric field decreases their magnetic permeability. In other words some ferrites are susceptible not only to magnetic influence but to electric influence as well.
I know that the grenade coil is big and flashy and exotic looking and most people think that some aetheric mumbo-jumbo is happening in it but in my book that is just an auxiliary device.
For now, all I want is for builders is to pay more attention to the electric and magnetic fields that the yoke is subjected to ...and to the material of the yoke itself.
Author
Topic: Dally, Shark & Ruslan workbench (Read 310282 times)
