Brian Ahern has just sent me an email about the Manelas device, summarising the pertinent features.
We have Arthur's original components, test data and conversational records: They are:
1. bifilar spiral windings at 22 gauge
2. SrFeOx billet (strong B-field, high resistance)
3. billet wound with bifilar wire
4. Test data;
5. voltage versus time for 7 days- 30 watts with dips and 162 volts
6. dips correlate with solar mass ejections
7. six day light bulb test at 60 watts at 180 volts
8. higher voltage gave much greater power
9. Billet may be magnetostrictive - may support scalar B-fields
10. thermistor mounted on the billet cooled by 3 - 5 degrees C
11. Manelas device #2 was not tested before his passing
12. July 2012 device over charged the batteries correlating with a Nova explosion in our galaxy reported in Japan.
13. Conversations:
14. Unipolar pulses must have as fast a rise time as possible
15. resonant frequency was ~ 130 kHz
16. Spril 22 2012 - massive overcharging of Arthur's large battery system ( > 500 pounds of batteries - supernova considered as the source
17. 170 feet in length for each bifilar winding
18. He referred to his device as CFA Cosmic Flux Amplifier
Our current model -_ energy comes from some entity like harvested neutrinos or scalar longitudinal waves or etheric capture a la Donald Hotson
We know the energy output was real and bifilar windings induce scalar waves.
Very fast pulses is our immediate goal.
Billet cooling is the most straightforward data source
Cooling is expected from spins randomizing and realigning at resonance
REALIGNING IS A NEGATIVE ENTROPY CONDITION.
TEMP. = dS/dU According to Nobel Lauriate Norman Ramsey
so negative entropy results in cooling.
Higher voltage showed higher power out put.
The correlation with solar mass ejections and Nova explosions, and the possibility that the energy comes from some entity like harvested neutrinos, has triggered the following thoughts..
I have long held the view that EM waves and gravity have a common origin where fundamental mass-less particles (like neutrinos) play their part in the creation of electric, magnetic, inertial and gravity forces on matter. This thread is not the place to detail how this can be, but briefly all these forces can be explained by momentum exchange when such particles are absorbed then emitted from a matter particle such as an electron. It is accepted that although neutrinos have zero rest-mass (and therefore travel through space at light velocity) they do have energy and momentum. For a stable particle like an electron, for each neutrino absorbed by collision one must be emitted. It only requires some internal time delay between absorption and emission for the electron to exhibit inertia, thus we have an explanation for inertial mass in terms of the number density of neutrinos in our part of space, the collision cross section (area) of the electron, that internal time delay and the known momentum of the neutrino.
It is also known that the neutrino has spin, which is a vector quantity separate from its velocity vector. If we postulate that the electron emits its absorbed neutrinos, not in a direction determined by that from which it arrived, but in a direction determined by the arriving neutrino’s spin, we have an explanation for what constitutes an electric field (e.g. from another electron) where the neutrino spin vector determines the field direction, either parallel to or anti-parallel to the velocity. It will be noted that this simple possibility accounts for the electric field effect travelling at light velocity, the electron’s property of charge and the force it endures (by momentum exchange) within an electric field. When the source of an electric field (say an electron) is moving relative to another electron (or vice versa) then the arriving neutrinos do not have their spins aligned with their perceived (relative) velocity vector, there will be a small transverse component. This then modifies the force direction when the neutrino is emitted, and that accounts for the magnetic force on the electron.
Of course for the electric or magnetic force to be recognisable it requires a stream of arriving neutrinos to all exhibit the appropriate spin alignment, and that is against the huge background density of neutrinos arriving from distant space having a multitude of alignments that appear random. That random neutrino background, having no observable pattern, is the so-called flat-space of relativity. As that background of arriving neutrinos has an average small transversivity of spin v. velocity vector, we then find that there is another force between matter particles related to that small transversivity. This comes about because neutrinos emitted have zero transverse spin, so those emitted from nearby matter to reach our test particle will create a force on it that would otherwise not be there. That force is towards the nearby matter, it is gravity. The pattern of outward travelling neutrinos with zero transverse spin is the curved-space of relativity.
It may seem incredible that the neutrino could be the carrier for so many different forces, and it is likely that the true theory of everything will be far more complex than that described above, but this simple concept has much to recommend it. And it could account for why the Manelas device exhibited a surge of performance associated with a surge of neutrinos.
Smudge
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Smudge's Papers (Read 13652 times)
