|
Partzman,
First of all my apologies for my late reply, however someone who was dear and close to me, died yesterday from this evil plague , and I feel quite low right now, but
i would like to answer some of your points, even if we have a different opinion.
“Nelson, I'm sorry if I came across as hostile because that was not my intent and I was certainly not considering any negative comments about LtSpice.Oh I defend the program all right but it is from due respect of the software's ability and it's author.”
I have nothing against the fact that you defend the LTspice program, or its author.
Myself wanted to learn to work with Ltspice and I start motivated by Itsu and Gyula because I recognize qualities in it, but without agreeing that it can be used in all situation, like in Aetheric situations by your own words .
I guess we are not really dealing with etheric issues in this Forum , even more when it comes to the Overunity Research forum.
We better leave aside the "unicorns" and fairy tales aside, and be objective in the real purpose that connects us to all who dedicate their time to research in this area of OU.
“I again apologize for making changes to your circuit but I've been a circuit designer for over 50 years so I took some liberties based on experience.”
“IMO the changes I made to S1 have no material affect on the circuit's operation except at start up. This should be of no concern unless one is expecting any OU behavior during this time.”
I know you have a long experience in simulating LTspice, I really appreciate your work that I follow over the years as well as other distinguished users , and I am sure that the changes you made will have the best intention, but in my opinion, some of these changes don't seem to fit the circuit that we are work and try understand.
I'll give you an example:
SW, it would be supposed to recreate a push button, giving only one pulse for the oscillator to start, and nothing more, however you can verify that the SW of your diagram, creates multiple pulses throughout the simulation, when it was supposed to be just one pulse .Am i wrong about my interpretation?
Try to take a sample in SW in your diagram and mine and you will be able to understand what I mean because the difference is evident.
This interferes too in some way in the behavior of C5 in the circuit, both in LTspice and in the real life circuit.
“I will have to go back thru the thread to see who actually built the circuit and if there was documentation showing anything about the performance, etc.”
The only documentation related to the circuit is the one that has already been made available some posts ago, and as you have already been told, no claim has been made. By knowing the behavior of some elements of this forum or in OU, myself anticipated it;) because it was expected that this would happen.
I have learned over the last years that even the apparently most evident manifestations of possible OU, can sometimes be a trap either for those who make the claims, or for those who challenge them to probe the opposite.
And I can assure you that I have been accused many times in an unfounded way, of making false claims, without even having the opportunity to express myself or even to others replicated some of my work, for lack of data.
But that is not relevant at the moment. I am over that a long time ago.
“I thought that since this was an OU forum that there was a possibility this circuit exhibited OU but I guess I'm wrong in that assumption so for that I apologize!”
Partzman ,You don't have to apologize for that.
It really is supposed that a forum like these investigates possible cases of OU, however if i am not wrong in the long time of existence of this forum, no concrete case has yet appeared or validated, right?
Or at least some of those possible cases died along the way …
Many of them, without scientific confirmation or even their correct replication, but sometimes through an easier and superficial judgment by some , that are false and impossible to exhibit some kind of sign of OU .
For this reason, I am grateful to a minority of persons in this forum Like Itsu which in my opinion is one of the best replicators on this forum , who manage to put self-centeredness aside, and are governed by the necessary pragmatism, to evaluate certain circuits dissected here.
So I repeat again:
You do not need to apologize for assuming that there might be a possibility that this circuit would exhibit some kind of manifestation OU, It seems logical to me, otherwise why would it be called Overunity Research?
it seems to me that we are in tune about this point .
Contrary to what maybe you may think, I appreciate your work and help, My thanks
Partzman best rewards
---------------------------
Best Rewards
Nelson Rocha
" The goal is not to be successful, the goal is to be valuable.
Once you’re valuable, instead of chasing success,
it will attract itself to you. "
|
Author
Topic: Itsu's workbench / placeholder. (Read 137330 times)
