Thank you for your responses.
I respect your answers and outlooks,
not to mention your points about
alternative forum's stance on these matters.
And the odds are high 90's of being pure rubbish,
but here is were I may loose respect here.
There are a few things about this that I've read about before
that do add up in my view of it and lend a sliver of possibility.
These things were found by people in physics forums,
not new age enviroments like that horrid example.
I mean, what if this is real?
Is it written somewhere a noble person must trip over the answer?
I mean wouldn't a dolt be just as likely to do so?
Remove the ubber new-age crap and think about it...
Can the all of you say with 100% confidence It's crap ?
I'm at risk of wanting to believe I suppose.
Sorry if you've already been down this road,
I have not explored enough about water.
I will stand by this statement strongly though,
there is way more we DON'T know about water,
than what we DO know about water...
@CompuTutor
Almost everyone I've met on the internet or in real-life considers me to be 'way out there' on most subjects.
I'll have stated many times 'what we don't know far outweighs what we do'
and
'Mankind claiming knowledge of all possible sources of energy is a simple blend of stupidity and arrogance'.
Certainly, water would be a good source if only because of the abundance on this planet. Let's hope this isn't true because every space traveling species will head this way to suck us dry.
There may be something to this cell concept but it is obvious this presenter doesn't have a clue of what that might be. They are only in the testing stages. There is no indication they have proven their theories.
On that note: Where is the theory? All I've seen looks like the ramblings typical during my flashbacks to the 60's/70's.
Geesh! I miss those flashbacks. Maybe, if I had one while reading that web site I could see some validity.
I hate to sound like a classic physics book thumper but I'm not. I am very open minded.
Being open minded does not require acceptance of baseless mumbo-jumbo presented with no evidence, clear misunderstanding of basic biology, chemistry and physics.
After all that.... the first mistake they make, in my eyes, is the web design. If a web page hits my browser looking like the typical cut-n-paste cult gathering - I hit the 'stop' button and go elsewhere.
I relish considering the ideas of others. First, they need to offer the ideas with something supporting them.
I hope you don't consider my statements harsh toward you. I certainly don't intend that.
As for the physics forums discussing this..... I'm a very longstanding and active member of a few of those forums. There is little to keep those folks from going off the deep-end. It happens. Believe me!