I just want to comment on this line from Jeff:
I don't even know you personally, but if we meet in person, the first thing that I would see is such hatred towards a group of folks that is trying to better this world.
I know that I say tough stuff sometimes. How can anyone in their right mind have something against people that are trying to make the world a better place? It's doesn't make sense!
This is a case where each individual has to use their own values and skills and perceptions to try to "read between the lines" when they come across groups of individuals supporting some kind of cause.
Are they real? Are they sincere? Are they a homogeneous group or are they a mixture? Are some people in the group following along without knowing that they might be being misled? Are some of the leaders sincere but actually misguided? Are some of the leaders actually being manipulative and cynically exploiting general ignorance about technology and also exploiting specific individuals? Are some of the leaders morally right with sound principles behind them?
These are all important questions for you to consider. You have to ask yourself how much you know about the issues, whether they are technical or social. You also have to be honest about your own knowledge and skill set and how much you understand what you are seeing and how well you can qualify what you are seeing.
These are all important issues. In the realm of free energy there is a full spectrum of propositions that are out there. The spectrum goes from outright crooks looking for money to completely altruistic individual experimenters that will send electronics components to each other for free and are always willing to help each other.
In the Bedini realm, it's a mixed bag, I am not going to say much more than that. What I will say is that at the Renaissance November workshop convention, every single piece of technology demonstrated was an under unity device. That is my learned opinion based on my education and real world experience and the way I read between the lines. At the same time, most likely the vast majority of people that attended the convention believed that they saw demonstrations of one or more over unity devices. The headline on pesn.com says, "Bedini Renaissance Conference marks turning point in overunity electromagnetic research." I am telling you that everything demonstrated at the conference was under unity. I wasn't there, I just read about it. I am expressing my judgment and firm opinion based on my education and life experience.
You don't have to agree with me. Ultimately I am giving you my opinion. But I am 100% confident that if I had the chance to check out every piece of technology demonstrated at the convention in a real lab, the test results would show that every thing was an under unity device.
So I don't feel any general hatred for people that are trying to make the world a better place. That simply doesn't make any sense. But for sure there are some good apples and some bad apples out there. Unfortunately Bedini himself is one of the bad apples. He is exploiting the general ignorance about how discharging inductors work and calling that "radiant energy." The Ferris Wheel motor is just a prop until someone comes forward with specifications that state exactly what it does.
I am not a "basher" with an agenda to target someone. I am just telling you how I see it, and I don't see any true tangible merits with respect to "Bedini technology" with the exception of the possible improvement in energy storage capacity and life-cycle extension that inductive charging can do to batteries.
MileHigh