PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2024-11-26, 17:26:04
News: A feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
There is also a "Shout" feature on each page. Only available to members.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
Author Topic: Tariel Kapanadze self runner - new video  (Read 70339 times)
Group: Guest
1) a lab coat, 2) a pyramid, and 3) latex gloves

 :D

Nice find. He sure wasted energy on dressing that capacitor up to look different.

There is another prop. The meter is too slow to indicate the real amplitude for the unloaded pulse.  The spiffed-up capacitor presents a load. If he used a scope with shots most could calculate the energy to be exactly the same AND the loaded magnet falling time IS slower.

Unfortunately, this joker is probably still collecting money. I know I could do a better job. It would be too easy.

If my pay cut from the early part of the economic crash isn't restored soon, you may see some videos from me.
I like the lab coat idea. I have no identifying marks on my hands so no need for gloves.


Just realized something.... This joker may actually think he has an indication of free energy.

I'll score his OU video as 15% scam and 100% stupidity (It is an OU video. More than 100% score is a requirement  ;) )
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3217
It's not as complicated as it may seem...
Good Grief! What a joke!

I'm sure many unsuspecting enthusiasts have given their money to this jackass and his company. What a blatant fraud.

It's really sad.

.99


---------------------------
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." Frank Zappa
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2735
I would agree that youtube video's mean very little in the way of proof, it is also kind of funny that even some persons with technical training will still say-- "this one has more promise than the others",lol. Well no, any expert worth his salt would know that none have any more validity than any others because we have no real facts--zero--nada--none. One cannot be more or less valid than any other when there is no real proof of anything other than the fact that someone made a video. This is why I consider only the primary concept of the technology proposed in any video and then if time allows I attempt to prove the concept for myself. Proof is when I have something that is on my bench that I can prove for myself, it is something tangible. The best we can say is that we have an opinion of something not based on any proof or facts of any kind, it is pure speculation.

Personally I am of the opinion that Kapanadze may have something because 1)He refers to Carl Linde's air condenser which in itself is a perfect example of a positive feedback mechanism and is referenced many times by Tesla, 2)He states the energy comes from the "air", ambient air or the surrounding environment which is positively charged relative to the ground plane -- the energy has to come from somewhere--period, 3)He states it is based on Tesla's technology and Tesla outlined how energy could be extracted from the environment in his lecture "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" in which he also states that many people have made many "assumptions" concerning the laws of science, that is they have infered many limitations which have no basis in reality and 4) I have actually built a replication of his device which I have been testing and the results to date look promising.
The fact of the matter is that we know we are surounded by infinite amounts of energy, there is no energy crisis and there never was, what we have is an "understanding" crisis because we do not understand how to extract this infinite amount of energy we know as a fact is everywhere.
Regards
AC
« Last Edit: 2010-10-17, 01:20:35 by allcanadian »


---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3217
It's not as complicated as it may seem...
And now to get things back on track a little...

I have annotated the patent drawings with the block nomenclature.

In the last wo2008103130_c.jpg, I have corrected what appears to be a significant error, in that the positions of the capacitor (5) was interchanged with the main board (HF Generator) (4). This correction not only makes the drawing in line with that of the older patent 129, but it now corresponds with the 130 patent text, specifically:

Quote
Opening the power switch (3), the user gives the electric energy received from the initial energy (1) to the first second part. being loaded with the electric energy received from the energy supply (1) the capacitor (5) serves as a pump, and provides the main board (4) to give electric to the system.

Main Board (4) transfers the high amount of frequency it generated to the first filter (6). First filter (6) stabilizes the frequency received from the main board (4) and regularly transfers to the first bobbin (7).

I've also taken the liberty to clean up and simplify the drawings.

More to follow.

.99
« Last Edit: 2010-10-19, 19:32:56 by poynt99 »


---------------------------
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." Frank Zappa
   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
If the capacitor is parallel, like the 129 patent, then it is like a reservoir and power supply votlage is supplied.

If the capacitor is series, then AC is restored and what the hell?

(His spark gap always looks like DC to me.)

What is a current amplifier?

What does he call a filter actually do?
   
Group: Guest

I don't know if you guys are alreay aware of the following posts from the Russian forum.

They are from SR193 who has claimed to have done the Kapanadze replication.

The question becomes did he really do the replication and if so is it operating on the same principle as Kapanadze's device.

It would have been nice if we'd had a real person to do the translation rather than the google translator...

http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php%3FPHPSESSID%3Dfadc3733f851cd35e279fac6cbf5e3e6%26topic%3D4.msg6554&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhh2YY7-09oziUyvN4Jvyl1R8LhnGA#msg6554

Quote
Re: invention T. Kapanadze - technica discussions
«Reply # 970: April 4, 2010, 12:49:37"

Quoting the author's video SR193, which we have here.

I want to clarify a few points:

    1) Kapanadze in his first video tells the truth, only his ideas and your can diverge, HP: the same response.
    2) Kapanadze correctly made that led to the gap, "the street" (outside the box), as if the discharge is not lit, then the focus does not succeed, so it is throughout the film was worried about the spark.
    3) The apparatus used two effects, only in combination they produce results. The arc has a wide range, some of these frequencies are resonant for the "ferromagnetic", which causes certain it processes. Field appears. But the field is "dead" and the work is done can not, therefore, connects the second process. The sum of these two processes and are used for receiving excess energy from the ferromagnet and in the air, this energy is not taken.
    And: ferromagnet can be represented as a material, where a lot of small magnets that in mind Hausa aimed in different directions and can not create the resulting field. The first process allows them to relax, the second turn, so that all these small magnets are created resulting field and powerful. If you just say, it creates a powerful magnet with an opportunity to control it. Well, on work of classical physics.

About my movie: who wants to see it as fraud, he must see. Such is the nature of man.

Another would ask the forum if possible, not take away the information in this forum on other forums.

PS: I read a message here about the alleged my business plan about this product, tell you straight - to me it's unnecessary.

I have free electricity and meaning to eat from this plant I can not see and it looks like it is harmful due to its emissions for two days with her and worked for two days I had a fever and headache.

PS: Roller with Yutuba removed. :al:" : Al: "



http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php%3FPHPSESSID%3Dfadc3733f851cd35e279fac6cbf5e3e6%26topic%3D4.msg6635&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhgtM530AR8Ru6q3N60AJKh1BNQ7Qg#msg6635

Quote
Re: invention T. Kapanadze - technical discussions
«Reply # 1023: April 4, 2010, 9:56:49"

Message from SR:

I want to say that the principle of work and equipment installation Tariel Kapanadze for me now is no secret. I shined it a lot of his time, it was hard just to filter out all the garbage that pours out on such forums where the futility of the information reaches 98%, but as the saying goes: there is a ray of light in this realm of the swamp (that's me about yourself-just kidding).

I am deliberately not going to post information about the technical side and in principle the work of the installation that would not get information "free riders". But not going to hide and be silent. Those who are "worthy" early go late, come to the principle. Under the "dignity" I understand the level of brain activity. I am willing to help people, those who really know how to think and understand the essence. I want to keep some "dresskod" access to information that is under the "dress code" refers to the level of thinking.

I want to say that I do not plan to profit from this knowledge and even myslyahne was I a man for whom wealth is knowledge, not rotten money. How would it not sound pathetic, but true. I will cite some confusion and misdirection:

1) Parametric resonance. I am always amused that the majority of forum participants actively discussed the parametric resonance oscillating circuit. I belonged to this debate with skepticism, since it is not all that teaches physics is fake. My Work profession is directly related to the technical sciences, such as electrodynamics and TFE, and I have an idea of the oscillatory circuit in which there is no CE. Yes, I agree that physics is not perfect, but it is still something is taught. Yes, the device Kapanadze have resonance, but it does not parametricheskiy [parametric resonance?]. remember about all kinds of resonances, and where they occur, can immediately guess what it was about.

2) electric arc discharge is more accurate. Many simply to fanaticism collect classic transformers arc gap looking at them, the principle of operation of the plant Tariel Kapanadze is also misleading and even what! Yes, dugovoyrazryad important to install, but it plays a very different role, he is not involved vkommutatsiyah. Those who collected these transformers, probably burned a lot of devices have to understand that they have collected is not something that Kapanadze, in other words it is just RF transformer with a high exit, this transformer is only good for toys.

3) Many people think that can not be output frequency 50 Hz with a secondary winding of the transformer installation Tariel (hereafter UT), and it too is fundamentally wrong! I want to say that for the formation of sinusoids used power bipolar transistors, PNP and NPN conductivity, each in its half-wave, and how it works with the transformer is not going to say.

4) Kacher and other Labuda, but an interesting toy, but it's only a toy and Set Betting is no. Many participants in forums trying to stick a feedback to the UT-this is also true, there is no feedback and no need to reinvent the blogs ikadrovoy horizontal sweep of their invented long ago and Tariel not in use.

5) The output transformer UT hardly a Tesla transformer, but the ordinary man in the street might think so. But the principles are quite different there.

6) At UT there nanosecond pulses and WASO has no relation to UT.

I would say that 80% of the principle of the installation can be seen in a video installation of 100kW, which prevents us to understand? It is our understanding, or rather mess of our knowledge, we are like robots trying to compare our knowledge with what they saw, often greatly mistaken. Tariel studied physics at school and thank God! We often than touch and evaluate the effect of climb for explanations in the book. Perceptions of our world are changing very quickly, but for some reason this does not happen with physics here can play badly for the effect of Edison? Take a look at history, most great discoveries have been made not learned men and ordinary people that the physics were not relevant.

Did not want anyone to run around, but still if someone touched it, I apologize.
PS: I forgot to mention that one of the elements of this mosaic (composed of various materials or ingredients.) is in the video madsatbg

If you only knew how easy it is and the feelings that I feel at this time simply breathtaking!

   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
also on this Russian Forum, Kapanadze talks about his alrger 100kW device, no ground, no oscillating circuit and resonance:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://next-energy.ru/&ei=MhS-TJzZKsGclgf72NzhBw&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBUQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dnext-energy.ru%26hl%3Den%26prmd%3Dv


Quote
Re: Тариэл Капанадзе и его "Чудо генератор" Re: Tariel Kapanadze and his "Miracle generator"
« Ответ #3752 : 11 Сентября 2010, 20:06:26 » Reply # 3752: September 11, 2010, 20:06:26 " Последняя информация с матрикса. The latest information from the matrix.

Корреспондент. Correspondent. Господин Капанадзе Вам удалось создать сверхединичный генератор вечной энергии? Mr Kapanadze you could create a perpetual energy generator sverhedinichny?
Господа! Gentlemen! Моя установка не является вечным двигателем я даже не скажу   что её кпд выше единицы. My setup is not a perpetual motion machine I can not even tell that its efficiency above unity. Правильно сказать, что коэффициент мощности   чрезвычайно высок. Correct to say that the power factor is extremely high. Мы даже не можем сказать на сколько, мы можем только   его ограничить, чтобы не было бесконтрольного выхода энергии. We can not even say how many, we can only limit it to avoid the uncontrolled release of energy.
Корреспондент. Correspondent.
Господин Капанадзе расскажите, какой принцип вы используете в установки. Mr Kapanadze tell us which principle you use in the installation.
Данный экземпляр основан на хорошо всем известном законе рычага. This copy is based on the well known law of the lever. Как   ведете, мы берём малую часть энергии из общей сети с помощью катушек   Тесла получаем сотни тысяч Вольт и отправляем через искровой промежуток   на усилитель тока. How does, we take a small portion of total energy network using Tesla coils get hundreds of thousands of volts and send it through the spark gap on the current amplifier. Принцип полностью аналогичен рычагу. The principle is identical to the lever.
Корреспондент. Correspondent.
Господин Капанадзе нам хорошо известно чтобы рычаг работал ему нужна точка опоры, где она в вашей установке? Mr Kapanadze we are well aware that the lever worked he needed a fulcrum, where it is in your setup?
Вы правы, в моих установках до этой я использовал заземление, которое   быстро разрушалось из-за процессов происходящих в почве вокруг штыря. You're right, in my installations up to this, I used ground, which is rapidly destroyed by the processes occurring in the soil around the pin. В   данной установки я скомпенсировал недостаток за счет трёх фазного   включения звездой. In this installation, I compensated by the lack of three-phase inclusion of a star.
Корреспондент. Correspondent.
Господин Капанадзе и всё же что в этих трубах, в которые бьет искра? Mr Kapanadze and yet in these tubes, in an effort to spark? Там есть редкоземельные или радиоактивные элементы? There are rare or radioactive elements?
Нет там не чего сложного. No there is nothing more complicated. Это трубы магнитные сепараторы от станков, внутри которых катушки из медной проволоки. This tube magnetic separators from machines within which the coil of copper wire. И всё! That's it!
Корреспондент. Correspondent.
Господин Капанадзе вы так спокойно рассказываете про устройство, не боитесь, что у вас будут конкуренты? Mr Kapanadze you so calmly telling us about the device, do not you afraid that you will have competitors?
Нет не боюсь. No am not afraid. Потому что мало скопировать все, что можно увидеть. Because little copy everything that can be seen. Надо   правильно настроить. Must be correctly configured. Не зная принципа не возможно настроить даже простой   радиоприёмник, хотя схема будет полностью работоспособна. Not knowing the principle is not possible to set even a simple radio, although the scheme will be fully functional.
Корреспондент. Correspondent.
Господин Капанадзе. Mr Kapanadze. Скажите, Вы ссылались на резонанс и опыт Мельниченко, Вы используете его патент в своей установке? Say, you have referred to the resonance and experience Melnichenko, you are using his patent in its installation?
Резонанс я использую, как это делал Тесла, а Мельниченко это человек   который близко подошел к тому, что я сумел открыть. Resonance I use, as did Tesla, and Melnichenko is a man who came close to what I was able to open. Нет, я не использую   патенты Мельниченко. Но в усилителях тока нет колебательного контура и  резонанса. No, I do not use patents Melnichenko. But in the current amplifier is not oscillating circuit and resonance.

Тариэл Капанадзе решил ответить на некоторые вопросы. Tariel Kapanadze decided to answer some questions. В данный момент он отвечает на 2х форумах. He is currently responsible for 2 forums. Запись беседы с помощником Тариэля по скайпу размещена на матриксе в соответствующей теме. Recording conversations with an assistant Tariel for Skype is available on the matrix in the relevant subject.

Удачи. Good luck.

PS: Жирным шрифтом выделил более важные моменты. PS: bold more important moments.



   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3217
It's not as complicated as it may seem...
Kapanadze is obfuscating this device by attempting to make it appear a wee bit more complicated than it actually is. At least that's my impression so far. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the filters, current amplifiers, and frequency adjusters are for future refinements only.

Judging by the videos, this device is quite simple and crude and is thrown together in a style reminiscent of our beloved SM.

And quite frankly, I'm not certain what Kapanadze hopes to achieve by obtaining these patents (which I doubt he will). He makes no claims, and there is not near enough info in the patents to vet against other similar applications/devices.

I watched the long video again. Too bad there aren't full 360º views of the coil. I'd like to see where all the leads are going. One end of the heavy 6T secondary appears to be open-ended  ??? An English subtitle translation would be helpful too.

Anyway, just a few comments for now. I'll try to post something more detailed in the next few days.

.99
« Last Edit: 2010-11-28, 14:20:07 by Peterae »


---------------------------
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." Frank Zappa
   
Group: Guest
One end of the heavy 6T secondary appears to be open-ended  ???

I saw that early on. I also consider that large conductor to be copper tubing with a central insulated wire conductor and that 'open end' crimped upon one end of that central conductor.

Just for future reference  ;)
   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
In the views of the Coil at the end of the long film, the open end of the 6T coil appears to have tape on it and it is hard to see if a wire is connected to it or not.  

There is also the part of the video where they disconnect the wire to the radiator and the output appears to go down.  

It is difficult to tell if the water pipe and radiator are connected to the same cable or separate connections.

In the quote above TK states that he no longer needs the ground and that it was used as a fulcrum to increase the energy (something like that and whatever that means).


   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
There is an image in Tesla's Colorado Springs Notes (page 197) that shows the same nodes/antinodes as an open air column drawn over his elevated terminal and secondary.  The Nodes are at the ends of the secondary and the antinode at the middle of the secondary and at the ground and top terminal.  Not only does the ground appear to be the equivalent of the top terminal, but the location of the ends of the secondary determine the location of the nodes.

Now, let's say that the 6T coil is positioned so that one end is over a node and the other an antinode produced by the primary coil. 

One end will be at max pressure and min. displacement -
the other end at max displacement and min pressure.

The capacitive top terminal and ground:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/opecol.html

The ends of the TK primary coil:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/clocol.html

Sort of an inversion of sorts...like a different kind of transformer.

The displacement is constantly refreshed.

So, where is the ground connected?
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3217
It's not as complicated as it may seem...
I saw that early on. I also consider that large conductor to be copper tubing with a central insulated wire conductor and that 'open end' crimped upon one end of that central conductor.

Just for future reference  ;)

Yes, I noticed the copper tubing as well. I suppose the output wire is either fed through and crimped at the end as you mentioned, or perhaps it is soldered to the output end.

.99


---------------------------
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." Frank Zappa
   
Group: Guest
I am going to make some general comments about earth grounds.  In many setups you see one side of a transformer coil connected to an earth ground.  Sometimes you see that the battery ground is connected to earth ground.

When you look at the schematics for many setups, you can see that all of the potential differences in the circuit are relative to the battery ground.  When there is a transformer in the circuit, the secondary output of that transformer is isolated from the main battery.  The secondary side can drive a whole separate circuit, and the potentials on the secondary side are completely independent from the potentials on the primary side.

In all of these cases, the potential differences are relative to each other.  There is no specific need for an earth ground.  The circuit operation is completely independent of the earth ground.  There is no need for an earth ground, the circuit has its own independent ground.

Supposing you connect the battery negative to an earth ground for a given setup.  Then all of the potentials in the circuit will now be relative to earth ground, because you have "tied" your battery ground to earth ground.  When you do this, typically the operation of the circuit will not change at all.  You could just as easily tie your battery positive to earth ground also, it would not make a difference.

Similarly, you could tie either of the outputs of your transformer secondary to earth ground.  Then the circuit on the secondary will have a potential that is relative to earth ground and may go above or below the earth ground.  One more time, typically the operation of the circuit will not change at all.

Instead of connecting one of the outputs of the transformer secondary to earth ground, imagine you had a 100-volt DC battery, where the negative of the DC battery was connected to earth ground.  You could tie either side of your secondary coil to the 100-volt terminal of the battery.  Since the transformer is isolating the secondary from the primary, one more time this would not affect the operation of the circuit at all.  For example you could connect the battery positive to earth ground and either of the terminals of the secondary output to the +100 volts above earth ground and the whole circuit will operate in exactly the same manner.

The moral of the story is that in almost all cases for a typical setup an earth ground connection is meaningless.  You should be highly suspicious of any claims that a setup is "getting energy from the earth ground" because that makes no sense at all.

MileHigh
   
Group: Guest
Part II of my discussion on earth grounds.

I know that many of you will say, "In the clip when they connect the earth ground the light gets brighter" or something to that effect.  There is in fact an obvious change in the way the circuit operates, so what gives?

The answer to this is related to the fact that almost all of the circuits have high-frequency AC signals in them.  When you make an earth ground connection, you are in fact modifying the circuit from an AC perspective.  By making the wire connection to earth ground it's like you are adding a capacitance and inductance into the circuit that wasn't there before.  So the circuit has changed and it will react differently.

Typically what happens is that you are providing a new path for AC power to flow through the circuit.  This can allow more overall power to flow through the circuit and consequently your LED or light bulb gets brighter.  In more technical terms the AC impedance of the circuit drops when you make the ground connection and as a result more power is supplied by the battery to the circuit.  Nothing is "coming up from the ground."  The apparent increase in power comes from the battery.

Here's a recent clip that illustrates this effect:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSA8gXJzqcU

When Jonny Davro touches the plasma stream with the tip of his finger, he is acting as a better AC ground for the setup as compared to the plasma stream discharging into the open air.  This lowers the AC impedance of the circuit and as a result the battery supplies more power to the circuit.  This increases the frequency of the Joule Thief self-oscillation which makes the spinning magnet being driven by the bifilar coil speed up also.

So he touches the plasma stream with the tip of his finger and the rotor increases in speed.  He changed the AC characteristics of the circuit and the battery output more power as a result of this.  As explained above, this can also happen when you add an earth ground to a circuit.

MileHigh
   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
I know that energy comes from the ground or earth.  I am not stupid.

The earth/ground is just a fulcrum, and we can attach a lever to it.  Longer lever = more mechanical advantage.

He could have just connected to a large structure - like in the newer videos, but he must not have known that when he made the earlier video.  You need a large surface area. In the 100kW unit he got rid of the ground - probably rotates the field.

Hmm - Maybe I'm just a dumb-ass...but I got a new schematic...
   
Group: Guest
Grumpy:

I guess that we differ on a lot of viewpoints but that's hopefully the fun in having a debate.  Sometimes we are going to clash on the use of language and terminology also.  Using the terms "fulcrum" and "lever" doesn't work for me in this case.  However, interestingly enough, an electrical transformer is a perfect example of a lever and fulcrum in action.  So perhaps we can bridge the divide sometimes.  I should look at any new schematics just the same.

If you can cite an example were an earth ground acts as a supply for energy I will gladly try to look at it.  If you were watching YouTube clips about two years ago a lot of experimenters went on a car ignition coil connected to a stripped CFL craze.  Most of them were under the impression that connecting to earth ground brought in extra energy to make the CFL brighter.  To the best of my recollection nobody did a check of the current consumption from the supply battery when the earth ground connection was made.  They just saw the CFL get brighter and assumed the extra power was coming up from the earth ground.

MileHigh
   
Group: Guest
In all of these cases, the potential differences are relative to each other.  There is no specific need for an earth ground.  The circuit operation is completely independent of the earth ground.  There is no need for an earth ground, the circuit has its own independent ground.

I hope you folks don't follow this advice to the letter.

Almost half of my special service trips are due to some individual thinking this advice is all encompassing. Yes, an electric circuit is fundamentally a simple loop and where that loop is grounded is normally not a great concern. Just don't remove the ground and don't change where ground is connected.

I'm ashamed to say that grounding is still as much art as it is science. When the scientist takes control of something as fundamental as grounding is when I must dig out my passport.

   
Group: Guest
To qualify my statements certainly I was giving unusual examples to illustrate a point and I don't expect that experimenters would try out unusual ground or earth ground connections.

The real point is that attaching an earth ground to the ground of an experimental setup that's powered by a battery or a bench power supply is normally not required.

If there are high-frequency signals associated with your setup, then there is a good chance that making making an earth ground connection will affect the operation of the circuit.

For major appliances like stoves and fridges or for machinery, you should never play with the ground connections.  Likewise for the third prong of a three-pronged plug.  You should never cut off the third prong.  The third prong is there to prevent you from possibly being electrocuted if the hot L1 or L2 mains power wire somehow gets shorted to the chassis of a device, like a hand-held electric drill.  Modern two-prong plugs are also polarized for a similar reason, and your house wiring should have polarized sockets.  Play safe!
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 520
Here is an angle to this.

For arguments sake, let's say you have a 100 turn air coil. You connect on end to positive, what does the other end become? Now take that other end and connect it to a wire that is loosely turned 6 times or so, now what does that connection point become? Now connect the last end to the negative terminal. Now what does that 6 turn wire become. The question then becomes what is the difference of making a 6 turns coil with each turn closely wound versus a 6 turns coil with turns that are 1/2" or so apart?

So why does that 6 turns fat coil have turns so wide apart. In my book it is because he does not want the coil to have two polarities. He wants the wide wound coil to have the same potential as the potential the leaves the 100 turn coil. The number of turns is irrelevant. One is many turns, the other is few turns wide apart. If the many turns end negative and the wide few turns is still negative that is then connected to the negative of the source supply, then that few turns coil is completely negatively biased. It is as if the few turns is just an extension of the many turns coil.

Putting that negative to earth ground just reinforces that same condition as if the few turns coil is pre-biased even before the many turns coils provides its own negative to the few turns coil. Sorry if this many be mixing you up.

Now what can you do with a coil that only has one polarity? That is my question.

If he no longer needs the Earth ground, then it has to be because his device generates enough negative bias to keep the system going on its own.

The last time I tested in that line of thinking I blew by HP214B Pulse Generator.


---------------------------
   
Group: Guest
MH,

Ditto  ;D

Certainly, for household appliances and hand tools. Thankfully, I don't need to deal with those except when they are mine. 'Machinery' covers a pretty wide spectrum. Most are not my concern. The lower level would be something like robotic production lines and computer controlled processes. I'm called on those quite often.

My highest points of aggravation are one of a kind installations of communication systems or test facilities. These always seem to have an individual proud of the quantity of letters suffixed to their name. On my last emergency call I corrected the problem and reported to the 'Big Guy'. Later I overheard the problem causer shouting about 'The Maths', 'The Model' and my favorite 'He is cracked! I have a PhD in the field and I don't know what he is talking about'.

Properly applied and correct math is always right. Sometimes the model is a bit more dynamic than the book.

The pin-head was terminated before I boarded the return flight.

My answer for what energy can be pulled from the ground is another question. Have you ever seen lightning strike? No magic there. Surely no OU.

@wattsup,

Your questions are always so loaded. Sounds like your coils are too  :D I need more time to provide answers.
 
   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
the earth connection, in this case, is just a displacement node

i.e. a spread out end of a transmission line

max pressure - min displacement

this positions the area of max displacement at the end of the primary coil and min displacement at the middle of the primary coil

this corresponds with the location of the collector coil (6T coil of copper tubing) - one end is positive and at max displacement the other end is negative and at min displacement.  It is as if you placed a battery across the ends of the collector.

This is loosely based on Tesla's Colorado Springs Notes - page 197 and 198 along with several other passages. 
   
Group: Guest
This is a shot of the audio spectrum from the Tariel Kapanadze long video made outside.

Audio captured while no one was talking and camera focusing on spark gap: 14:11:01 - 14:11:05.

Don't know if the peaks starting around 7KHz are camera artifacts or what..


Edit: it appears that the frequency of the first few spikes is around 553Hz

« Last Edit: 2010-10-20, 17:23:33 by duff »
   
Group: Guest
G,

I found these pics to be closest to any possible function, within my understanding.

None show the loose tubing (unterminated transmission line) outer winding. I'm starting to wonder if TK's device is a successful attempt at building the perfect tank circuit. Meaning, perfect C and L by way of the dynamic effects each has upon the other during oscillation or passive negative reactance for L & C at critical points in the cycle.

Impossible? Yes  ;)

My definition of 'impossible' is similar to my definition of OU.

 
   

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
If the collector is open, that would change a few things.

Interestingly, The open end of a line is a pressure antinode (max) and the position of the 6T coil corresponds to the pressure antinode of the coil (the middle.  However, if you have one collector in the field, you need another one to complete the path and that is the cable through the center to ground.  This arrangement is now the first one that I described when I first saw the device.  (Talk about coming full circle.)

The big question is if the 6T coil open or closed?
   
Group: Guest
My view:

The tubing is definitely open at the taped/crimped end - except for the possible inner return conductor.

The only way I can see the TL concept working is if the electric field radiated from the main coils is radial. This would explain the need for a copper shield between the two counter-coils and the core.

The funny thing is..... except for the spark gaps and tubing winding... I use the same concept to design variable inductive load reactors.  8)

At certain points of the cycle, the inductance can be almost infinite. I don't know how the same could be done for winding-winding capacitance.
   
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-11-26, 17:26:04