Dear TK,
You are correct. No matter how promising a new technology may appear (high COP & significant power level) it does not pass the definitive OU test until it can become a self runner and produce much more energy than its weight in the best known battery technology. Graham pretty much described this standard in his presentation.
So really, all we have is a promising technology approach, with not as much detailed information as we would like, that has not passed any test as a genuine OU device.
However, individuals do now have the opportunity to review a new technology (among many) and decide for themselves if it is worth their time and resources to do any further exploration into it. I believe it is.
I also continue to value & appreciate the reviews, comments, ideas, and prespectives that the knowledgable members have taken with their personal time to even consider this subject.
Spokane1
Thank you for this frank review and commentary, Spokane1 - and for your work on this (and others!) While I agree that self-looping is the best way to demonstrate what we are looking for, I don't think its the ONLY way. For example, with DC input, it is straightforward to measure the input power. Output power can be measured (in general) by dumping the electrical power into a resistor, placing this in water (actually, a calorimeter - insulation and some stirring etc are needed). Thus using a calorimeter with some care, one can measure the output power definitively - without the need for self-looping. Then one compares Pin to Pout. In any case, a replication by another independent party is needed for ou demonstration, imo.
|