Really? You cannot possibly be serious. I can't believe that people are actually falling for this. Look at all the power supplies that ARE NOT BEING MEASURED but which are providing power to the apparatus.
The proper locations for measuring the INPUT POWER are shown in my markup of Spokane1's block diagram.
Power supplied to _all components_ that are required for the performance of the entire apparatus _must_ be considered as comprising the input power!
Sheesh. No wonder nobody will answer my question: If it draws 0.000 W INPUT, why can't it be disconnected from the power supply and keep running? Now we know the real answer. The "0.000 W" and the other "input power" measurements are not the _actual_ input power to the apparatus! Even if they are correct, which they almost certainly are not, they ignore the power supplied to other components without which the apparatus would not work at all.
Good Morning Mark, TK, P99 and all.
It appears that a lot of serious experimenters are here!!! This is very good!
The excellent questions about the power measurements are all point on. Perhaps
at this early conceptual stage with the investigation of this device it would be wise to to note
that Graham was showing the concept of a transformer that in itself appears to have
excess power producing capacity. He himself was not satisfied with the device and
is continuing to work on it as shown in pictures.
Let us assume that the measurements shown of and around
the transformer itself do show excess output internally. That is a good first step.
As power supply losses appear to not have been included in
the calculations, and as all measurements can be questioned, perhaps
closing the loop is the only way to show that this type of transformer
is a self contained power producing device. That is, not only powering itself but
providing excess power as a gift to the world.
It would appear that Graham has gone to great lengths in his output power supply to work at a high
as efficiency as possible by the switching circuitry using FETs as rectifiers, snubbers, very high speed isolaters, etc. as can
be gleaned from the pictures. That was probably his first steps when looking at the device overall and down the road.
Unfortunately we do not have schematics of this device! As an experimental builder, this drives me up the wall.
But, here, we have been shown a dream, with excellent power measurements up to a point. I think everyone here
can take these ideas and run with it and see where we go. All of us has had a "EURIKA" moment (I know I have) that upon
further measurements turned the "Eurika" into crow we had to eat. But we keep flailing away!
On Overunity.Com page 4, comment 53, gotoluc has shown a waveform very similar to Grahams with description as to how he produced it.
Perhaps he can give us more insight into his circuitry etc. Anything at this point would be helpful.
Respectfully to all,
Ben K4ZEP
Author
Topic: Graham Gunderson Energy conference High COP demonstration (Read 235549 times)
