PopularFX
Home Help Search
Advanced search 
Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2025-04-01, 01:48:56
News: If you have a suggestion or need for a new board title, please PM the Admins.
Please remember to keep topics and posts of the FE or casual nature. :)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9
Author Topic: Meyer-Mace Isotopic NMR Generator  (Read 121149 times)

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Good results this afternoon on the oscillator.

I established my yellow core was 20mm diameter and thus a T20-6 despite this i could not get the desired frequency.
I then decided to either order a T25-6 core or try a new approach.

I switched to the Colpitts oscillator.
http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Colpitts_oscillator

as i did not have the 2n2222 transistor i tried a BC547C and the circuit would not oscillate so i switched to 20pf caps instead of 100pf and it started oscillating.

I made the 150nH inductor using the calculator here
http://www.pronine.ca/multind.htm

Using a 3mm screwdriver shaft as my winding former i wound 13 turns of 28AWG wire giving about a 1cm length inductor and soldered it in place, my running frequency
was high at about 70MHz, so i then increased the turns on the inductor to 20 turns and increased my 20pf caps to 40pf which got me roughly in the right frequency.

Next i added a 100nF to the collector and started trying diodes, first i tried a 1n4148 and this proved to not give much adjustment, i tried my 5watt 15V zener and that killed the oscillations.
Next i tried a 1n4007 and this worked really well, i found under 2.5V it would alter the amplitude of the oscillation but once 2.5V was reached it was stable amplitude upwards, i adjusted my inductor turns spacing to give me 45Mhz and could wind the tuning voltage from 2.5V up to 14.7V to give me 46Mhz

2.5V = 45.0087MHz
14.7V = 46.0096MHz

It appears pretty stable as well with an amplitude sinewave of 1.44V pk-pk output and the oscillator draws 4mA.

Just need to rebuild it again as this one is a bit messy having tacked dozens of components  and then put it into a screened box and i will be done.
   
Group: Tech Wizard
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1250
Hi Peter,

You have been well-labouring for sure, congratulations.    O0

When you rebuild it, into a box, and find it will not start up  :-[ I would suggest increasing the DC operating point of the transistor a little by placing a 10 kOhm trim pot in place of R3 10 kOhm upper base resistor and set a little bit higher current than what the 10 kOhm establishes now. I say this because in the box the qualiity factor, Q of the coil will be lowered, hence the AC impedance of the tank the collector sees will also be lower so the transistor should have a higher gain for start up. Make sure to switch on and off several times the supply voltage to have a sure startup.
One more thing: use a separate voltage stabilizer to feed it if you can, this of course depends also on what source you use for the varicap tuning voltage.

Gyula
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Thanks gyula, i will try those things  O0

I will look at adding a switchable variable sawtooth feed as well so i can sweep up frequency at different speeds.
Probably will need a buffer amp stage added.

and finally need to try and find an easy 50MHz power stage to build, 50-100watts would be nice, not yet sure about driving a 22 turn coil which will be my load.

Cheers
Peter
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3670
Probably will need a buffer amp stage added.
For Colpitts ...most certainly.

and finally need to try and find an easy 50MHz power stage to build, 50-100watts would be nice, not yet sure about driving a 22 turn coil which will be my load.
Search eBay for keywords "Amplifier MHz" ...but when I did that a month ago, the only amplifier worth mentioning was from that Russian guy for $300.
Pay attention to the input power, that is needed to achieve that 100W.   I have seen some crappy offers that require 25W input in order to get 100W output.
The output impedance matters too...
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
   
Group: Tech Wizard
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1250
Peter,

The PA circuit  is from an Application Note done at Advanced Power Tech in 1998 or so,  later acquired by Microsemi, the Application Note includes some more details and the circuit.
I noticed the appnote is also included in that link, so I just deleted from my attachment

The Aliexpress offer sounds good in price for the power FETs I think.  

Gyula
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3670
Indeed i have been looking, about the chepest option i have found so far is this setup
http://circuitdiagram.net/mosfet-linear-amplifier-300w50mhz.html
As you probably know, I am experienced with electronics yet I would not attempt to build that circuit to save over some already debugged kit.
Not because there is anything wrong with the design, but the construction traps in it are huge.  The TL1 and TL2 matching lines, magnetics, windings and impedance controlled routing will put hair on your chest. You will blow the FETs if everything is not perfect and in the end it will cost you more than that ready to use board from this Russian guy or this Sloveni guy or this Israeli guy or this Spanish guy.

...even if your time is free.
« Last Edit: 2015-09-28, 14:42:30 by verpies »
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
OK been having good fun with the oscillator.

Could not get the replication to go above 26MHz tried vero (maybe too much capacitance) then FR4 but using sticky copper tape for tracks, eventually i realized my power decoupling was no good, once rectified my frequency came right up.


Current build is per my circuit and is working well, i increased the bias current using 5k6 resistors and also increased the emitter current by using a 1k1.
Not yet tried it in a box or the variable base pot.

I now have a 100ma 12v regulator on board and can adjust between 45 & 46MHz using a tune voltage of 2.2 - 12V

Need to have a play with a sawtooth generator next.

EDIT Ooops C5 is 330nf
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Added a sawtooth generator today.

Changed my 1N4002 tuning diode to a MUR160 diode which allows a lower voltage swing, as stable tuning happens about3V i have added D5 a 5.1V Zener so that my sweep is floating at a higher voltage, need to lower the 5.1V to about 3V3 but need to order a diode, the sinewave is 4.5V pk-pk

At the moment i can adjust between 2 Seconds 25 Seconds sweep but will increase this to 60 Seconds, i have a bit of 45MHz superimposed on my sawtooth output so need to add some more lower value decoupling to the sawtooth board.

The sawtooth circuit is Fig d but using 2 1N4148 diodes in place of the LED and without the negative trigger as per Fig c
See here http://www.simplecircuitdiagram.com/2010/10/15/sawtooth-generator-oscillator-with-transistors/

A Couple of scope shots

1ST is the sawtooth

2ND is the sawtooth voltage blue and sinewave yellow

Image of my circuit so far

and finally the build so far.

Still a number of tweeks to do and then place in a diecast box.
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3670
I am confident that you will get this circuit to frequency modulate the 45.5MHz center frequency as you intend.
When you do, the next step will be to boost the output power and you will need a hefty RF amplifier as well as the ~50V power supply for it.
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Hi verpies

Yeah i know i need a power amp, i can do the psu very cheaply, i have the chance of large power transformers i can buy very cheaply.

The power amp is a problem that i think about a lot, we still don't have any physics showing any idea how much power it will take, we don't therefore know how much of a powerfull amplifier we need, bearing in mind Meyers first setup used a low power crystal oscillator to demo the effect on copper.

Years ago i had a friend who was into CB Radio 27MHz he had a valve burner using a single PL519 TV linestage valve, now i remember there was nothing to it, so maybe someone knows a way to build a 500 watt 50MHz valve stage, there has to be a way to cobble together an amplifier on the cheap, until that day arrives i will plod on.

Once the oscillator is finished i will try a 16Watt preamp.
http://www.qsl.net/va3iul/Homebrew_RF_Circuit_Design_Ideas/50MHZ_16W_MOSFET_PA.gif

I am sure there is a cheap answer to the problem.
   
Group: Tech Wizard
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1250
....
Once the oscillator is finished i will try a 16Watt preamp.
http://www.qsl.net/va3iul/Homebrew_RF_Circuit_Design_Ideas/50MHZ_16W_MOSFET_PA.gif

I am sure there is a cheap answer to the problem.


Hi Peter,

If you fancy power tubes, perhaps the type QQE06/40 would be a candidate, the cheapest offer at ebay now comes from Bulgaria for USD 9.99 + 8.50 shipping.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ZAERIX-RS1009-QQE06-40-5894-AX9903-SRS4451-Vintage-Double-Tetrode-NEW-/252119900199?hash=item3ab3846027

And here is a description and a schematic for a 350W output 50MHz amplifier with 3 such tubes connected in parallel:

http://www.vk3nx.com/files/50MHzAmp.pdf 

Any other types of power tubes cost much more than the above offer at present, here is a useful page on further tube types, though you may be familiar with them:
http://www.qsl.net/gm3woj/8877amp.htm


Regarding power MOSFETs, there is also the possibility for paralleling them, see a circuit in the application note attached, from Microsemi site.

Here is a 250W 50MHz amplifier with IRF510 MOSFETs, 4+4 in parallel push-pull circuit,

http://frenning.dk/OZ1PIF_HOMEPAGE/50MHz_IRF510.htm

Earlier in your post you gave a link to an aliexpress offer on the ARF448A and B types (and the price is very good wrt say a DigiKey price offer),  these types were designed to have mirror image pin-outs of each other, easing the push pull operation in a common source configuration.
I attached the data sheet for the ARF448 because there is a 40 MHz test circuit in its last page for a single FET with matching components shown, supply voltage is 150 VDC.
The reason I refer to this is that I do think a cheap power MOSFET with more or less similar salient characteristics could be inserted and see how they perform.  A cheap candidate I can think of is
http://eu.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Infineon-Technologies/IPW65R190CFD/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMshyDBzk1%2fWi8PS859SDBCOPdJUWRS6dWM%3d 
or
http://eu.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Infineon-Technologies/IPW65R110CFD/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMshyDBzk1%2fWi8PS859SDBCOcNvGwLMn3HE%3d

These are just suggestions of course (the latter types are mainly for switch mode operation of course) but if you wish to broaden the number of choices you can consider such 'wild' choices too.  8)

Gyula
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Hi gyula

Thanks for the links and info, mulling it over to work out which way to go, i have to say i feel valve feels more robust for what we want to do

Thanks
Peter
   
Group: Tech Wizard
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1250
Hi Peter,

Yes, this setup represents basically an inductive load for a power amplifier and valves indeed much more forgiving in this respect. And tuning the inductive nature by capacitors involves big changes in the load impedance what semiconductors do not like at all.

A friend of mine suggested to obtain cheaply a defunct power amplifier on a 'flea market' or from a ham radio guy and convert it to 50 MHz PA as your needs dictate, that would be a cheap way to have a functioning PA.  This idea works cheaply only if you have not yet got all the main parts needed anyway for such PA.

Gyula
   

Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 782
Believing in something false doesn't make it true.
If you can find a "6 meter" ham amp, that will be real close to what you want and may work with only minor retuning.  The 6 meter amateur band goes from 50 to 54 Mhz.  Good luck on your build.

Carroll


---------------------------
Just because it is on YouTube does not make it real.
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Thanks gyula & CITFA i will keep an eye out on ebay, lots to do mean while and at a snails pace i am afraid.


EDIT
Cannot find anything on Ebay at the moment.

I am wondering if an old radio or electronics magazine has a construction project for such a valve amplifier, will need to do some old mag searching.
« Last Edit: 2015-10-17, 22:26:36 by Peterae »
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
This is related to Michel Meyers work, infact the author 'Renaud de la Taille' is the same author of the "Science et Vie" nr.700 March 1976 (pages 42-45 ) "

Below is a translation of an article here it seems Renaud de la taille translates as Mr Renaud of size.
http://jardin.secret.pagesperso-orange.fr/EcritsScientifiques/pseudo-sciences/SynergeticArticleScienceEtVie1.htm

Quote
Author: Mr. Renaud of Size (+).

Journal Science and Life, in November 1975.

While the first synergistic generator has been running, official science continues to ignore the work of Pr. Valley.

This is even more serious than the work leading to energy independence.

Also we asking researchers to speak unequivocally about the value of the synergistic theory.

Since a theory is valuable only if the experience comes confirm, Synergy was tested this summer in Belgium. The results are positive. For the first time, a power amplifier operated with only energy intake outside the universe that surrounds and belongs to us all.

The generator built by Eric Mortsel Hoker restored four times the power he had been given, which is in itself only a disconcerting result, and quite inexplicable within the old theories of physics. For nothing is lost, nothing is created, and it was necessary that the extra energy found at the exit to come from somewhere.

Now that extra energy seemingly from nowhere confirms undeniably the synergetic theory of Professor Valley whose basic premise is this:. Inter-atomic spaces, interstellar and intergalactic universe, usually considered void,

are in fact the seat of intense electromagnetic activity, and non-material, in continuous distribution, which results from the superposition of distinct elementary waves propagating in all directions with generally little different speeds therebetween. This hypothesis in a more convenient form by saying that the structure of space is energy can be translated. The material can thus exchange energy with the space, and that is what has just confirmed the experience of Mortsel. Moreover, this energy is boundless, and the device that allows the capture is relatively simple.

For our readers, this information is not new. It is now a year and a half we had briefly outlined the synergetic theory (February 1974 issue). More recently, at the beginning of this year (January 1975 issue) we took the subject on the failures of controlled nuclear fusion in the Tokamak system failures provided and explained by the synergistic.

Before returning to this and the Belgian experience this summer, we need to look at a problem still curious: the absolute silence with which was greeted this new theory. Certainly, it stirs many acquired knowledge and shocked many dogmas; but that none of the fundamental physics of specialists has dared to give an opinion - for or against - is breathtaking. For articles in which we have put into question not only the CEA, but also some famous names of French science, have not elicited any response. Unique in the annals of our review.

If tomorrow we wrote an article explaining that the EDF is wasting his time, energy and money of users to build high voltage lines while an engineer managed to put the bottles running, we would receive a correction immediately We publish

explaining, whether the process is known but unenforceable or it is valid but too expensive, or even that it is a pure fabrication. It would be the same if we wrote that pharmaceutical companies will pay people's heads since seawater heals everything, or it is ridiculous to construct four-wheeled vehicles whereas with two tracks that would go much better .

With nuclear physics, which nevertheless mobilizes time, energy and taxpayers' money, nothing like that. Apparently nobody dares to give the counterpart to Professor Valley. because finally the synergistic theory opens perspectives so vast, in a simple mathematical framework, it deserves to be considered. Or it is true, and it must be said, and modify all nuclear programs accordingly; or it is false, and we must prove it. It is doubtless that the difficulties begin: To prove that a theory is inaccurate or incorrect, you have already given the evil of the study, and, in addition, have the necessary knowledge to this critical study . The silence surrounding this theory therefore explains that in two ways: those responsible for basic research does not even give wrong to study the synergistic and they fail in their mission; or they do not have the required knowledge and this is even more serious.

What makes the thing difficult to accept is that the Professor Valley theory is known in scientific circles high level. of course she met sympathizers. Apparently, she did not encounter any opposition since nobody so far has dared to declare officially that this theory was incorrect, false, marred by contradictions or even quite absurd. It is true that he who would write this we should prove it, so would have to discuss the problem with Pr. Valley.

And we must say that it is a formidable orator, who has already returned some opponents, yet the highest level, that it would do about the paradoxes of general relativity. We understand better why nobody dares to bring him the contradiction, but obviously that tarnish the beautiful image that the official science wants to give of herself. His silence is no longer that of indifference, but of embarrassment and a certain lack of courage: If after all Valley was right, as seems to prove the experience that would be said in hindsight his opponents?

We will begin by recalling the basics of synergistic, before seeing the amazing opportunities it opens to the energy problem. Initially, the consistency principle which states: all natural phenomena could be apprehended experimentally in the universe are consistent; meaning they all depend, more or less close and more or less complex relationships with each other in manifesting, each as a result of the local universal dynamics. They can not therefore, in any case, in space and in time, be in conflict with the state of the universe as it should be at this place and at this moment.

This statement clearly distinguishes a physical phenomenon that any mathematical model can give. One can, in fact, represent the laws that govern physical phenomena known as equivalence mathematical expressions, to the extent permitted by the measures as much as possible trying to reduce them to simple implicit functions which appear only quantitatively defined parameters, actually physically measurable and reproducible. In principle, progress results when the experimental results require, by adding a number of new parameters necessary for a more accurate expression and finer described laws. Science would go more complexity, thesis that opposes the search for unity.

The synergetic theory realizes the synthesis between these two opposing trends by introducing - and this follows from the principle of consistency - quantitatively defined notion of synergy, extending the principle of conservation to open systems. We'll assume this concept fairly short order, because its complete description requires a good knowledge of electromagnetism. This time we can not even send our competent readers to the work of Professor. Valley because it is currently sold out.

Here then restricted statement: Any physical phenomenon can be seen in isolation as a result of the interaction energy of two circles defined: one of these areas located in space and time can quantitatively be expressed by an equivalent mass m, called Maupertuis mass, associated with the limited area where circumscribed manifestation of the phenomenon; the other medium, related to the physical space of reference, which therefore contains the phenomenon itself, may be defined, in its overall interaction with the mass m of the middle, by the synergistic potential c², the square of the speed the light in the reference medium.

S The total energy or synergy (since it takes into account all energy), which can be associated with the phenomenon studied is given by the fundamental relationship of synergetic theory (established in 1905 by Einstein, but unfortunately reduced to a narrow concept of energy equivalence of matter). S = mc². The speed of light thus characterizes the physical reference medium; it can hence be related to a potential for interaction, represent a universal invariant despite very small variations beyond, in most cases, the accuracy of our measuring devices.

Emptiness is Full of energy

To return to more easy to grasp patterns, the synergistic hypothesis leads us to consider the physical space as a substrate consisting of electromagnetic vibrations within the meaning of Maxwell, forming the frame of the non-material world; which means that each wave propagates in a medium consisting of non-material all others and which, by the very logic of things, is eternal. In all these diffuse cosmic waves that make up the environment, must be considerable energy density. By calculating that allows Newtonian approximation, it is possible to determine a difference of 16000 kWh in a volume of 1 m³, empty of material, taken in the surface of the Earth and the same volume belonging to the space interstellar neighbor in our solar system.

Note that this radiation constituting the diffuse energy are of very short wavelength (2 to 3 times 1014 GHz) and the substance originates in the diffuse cosmic environment when the electric field, random statistical fluctuations, reaches the limit value of 38,67.1015 V / m. The material is thus only energy diffuse locally trapped and kept in this form by a resonance phenomenon with diffuse energy free. It can not thus grow indefinitely in any point in space, creating material acting as a power regulator.

The interaction between matter and energy had been known for relativity, but there is a much more satisfactory explanation. First the vacuum, in the geometric sense, does not exist; this is just a convenient concept in mathematics. In reality, all the space is constantly traversed by a radiation rain from all directions and carrying a lot more energy as solar radiation, although basic-ment of the same nature, that is, Electromagnetic say.

It is known that a wave is characterized by two parameters: its amplitude and frequency. For example, sound waves are strong or weak, low or high; the wave energy spreads are still more or less strong, often carrying some more energy than others, and it is interesting to trace the curve indicating the amount of energy transported for each frequency. Just as one might, for example, play together all the notes of a piano, but not all at the same force, and would trace the curve giving the sound power for each note, that is to say each frequency.    And when you draw the energy distribution curve spreads, we obtain a hilly profile, the highest peaks correspond to the frequency of the neutron and proton, the two most massive elementary particles. No wonder that since we have said, the matter remains in this form that resonance with certain frequencies of energy diffuse; the two most energetic frequencies thus ensure the cohesion of the two heavier fundamental particles. The electron and the deuteron (a proton, a neutron forming the core of deuterium) correspond to two other peaks of the curve, including all other vertices ensure the cohesion of the cores of increasingly heavy.

The stability of an atomic nucleus is linked to electromagnetic interactions more or less intense between the natural frequency to the core and that of the corresponding diffuse energy. But the agitation of diffuse medium, during its statistical fluctuations can cause a nucleus to move from a resonance state to another by releasing the passage of energy in electromagnetic form, particle form, or under the two forms at a time. This suggests a possibility of direct use of the diffuse energy of gravitation which the available reserves are very simply inexhaustible.

To pump a little in its reserves, it appears that nuclear reactions involving beta radioactivity seem most suitable. Energy considerations show that during a beta decay, the diffuse medium which provides the work. The key to the energy extraction assembly resides in the reconstruction of a ß radioactive element. According to the Charter of half decay time and energy released by decay of elements and isotopes, carbon-12 appears among the basic elements, one of the most interesting since its isobaric (same weight of the core) boron 12 shows beta energy of 10 MeV in average. In more classical terms, with a coefficient of efficiency of 10-5 (1 atom per 100 000 reacts) and an overall yield of 20%, the boron disintegration 12 provides 8 kW per gram. Twenty grams therefore provide 160 kilowatts or 217 horsepower which is the power of a Porsche Carrera.

So the carbon that was selected for the first generator due to the synergistic Belgian E. Hoker. How to produce boron-12 from carbon? For a simple reaction predicted by theory and confirmed by controlled nuclear fusion testing; we have already dealt with the subject (in January 1975). Normally, the free electrons within the material are attracted to the positive nuclei and tend to orbit around; in classical physics, it is also their only possible behavior.

It is demonstrated by Synergy against that we can succeed in something much more interesting: the electron should return to the core through intense magnetic fields, parallel and opposite to electric fields. This spin of electrons on the carbon core 12 converts the boron 12, radioactive, which belongs to the state of carbon 12 by releasing a portion of the energy withdrawn from the medium diffuse through the ß radioactivity. It remains to be learned in a practical form the beta energy. It is known since the work of Lee and Yang, the beta emission occurs in a preferred direction, that of the magnetic field. The additional current thus created can be used by Joule effect, or even better, by slowing the electrons in a secondary coil that directly provide alternating current.

The experiment conducted in Belgium was to verify this figure; a capacitor charged by a battery was then discharged through a short carbon rod - as graphite. This first circuit constitutes the primary winding of a conventional transformer, whose secondary winding was connected to a ballistic galvanometer. In addition, the graphite was housed in a coil for generating the magnetic field of the same direction as the electric field. In the absence of current in this winding was recovered   secondary energy launched in carbon less the usual losses specific to any processor. By cons, sending more current in the coil surrounding the atoms, thus creating the necessary magnetic field according to the theory, it changes the power received at the secondary of a factor of 4. It therefore receives 4 times more energy is brought into the entrance, the diffuse medium is of course behind this multiplication of watts.

For now, it is only a reduced power laboratory machine; but it contains the whole principle of a pumping power generator diffuses around us. Just take the secondary current required to maintain the reaction in carbon, and there will be an eternal electric generator whose only price will be that of its construction: coal, copper and iron wire; add a simple electronic circuit to control the input current and the field needed for magnetization to obtain the desired frequency; and that's all.    There is even an even simpler experiment, but the professor Valley discourages profane as it might be as random as to toss in a small room mixture of glycerin, nitric acid and sulfuric acid. Here it is: take a carbon stick as there are in any ordinary button cell and connect the two ends in the socket by interposing a light bulb on the circuit for resistance. Make a winding thread around the carbon and also connect the socket by interposing an assembly such that the magnetic field created by the winding is in phase but opposite to the electric field. If we just falls on suitable values ​​of the magnetic torque electric-field field will collect   the modest power of 8 kW per gram of carbon, with a few tens of watts to entry.

So it is a must try with some caution, because if it is in principle exactly similar to the Belgian experience, amplified a hundred times the current of the 220 V sector may create surprises. Let's leave it so for now in small experimental generator, seeing it as the start of the greatest revolution of the century: energy independence. Suffice indeed, at the individual level, possess a modest 100 kW generator to provide lighting and heating an entire house. The same generator sufficient to cause well beyond the 130 km / h any big car. Farewell oil, coal, uranium and waterfalls; Farewell also immense fortunes and huge profits. So ultimately hindering the spread of synergistic?

Renaud SIZE

Republished by Charlie Renegade

By performing this mounting, the Belgian Eric Hoker proved it was possible to draw energy in this unlimited reservoir posed by electromagnetic waves of the universe. It thus opened the way synergistic generators, high real inexhaustible battery power. In the device shown diagrammatically here, the current charge of a battery a condenser, which is then discharged through the graphite in the sealed glass between two iron electrodes. In the absence of current in the coil orientation, one obtains in the secondary the energy sent to the primary, less the usual losses, about ½ CV². If we raise the current in the coil with the rheostat, there from a certain threshold, the current collected by the galvanometer is 4 times stronger, 2 CV². This extra power comes from the diffuse medium on which were collected energy through carbon, as provided by the synergetic theory. The against-experiment by replacing the carbon with other conductor no longer shows any secondary power multiplication.

(+) This text is a transcript of an article published in 1975 in the magazine Science & Vie and written by Renaud De La Size by Mr. Charlie Renegade, on its website (*). The latter, whom we thank here, declining any responsibility for the scientific value of this text ((*) http://photovni.free.fr/Synerg%E9tique2.htm).

Note: In 1971, Professor René-Louis Masson at Valley edited: 'The material and gravitational electromagnetic energy, synergistic model' (reissued in 1978 by SEPED, a company created to promote "new energy source") . Renaud Size of three articles devoted to it in the journal Science and Life, which

o        Renaud of Size, "a wall of silence around the synergetic theory Pr. Valley, "Science et Vie n ° 698, November 1975;

o        Renaud of Size, "A young French built an inexhaustible battery" Science et Vie n ° 700, January 1976.

(It seems that he also wrote "A power plant at home").

Mr. Levy and Mr. GRÉAS-Leblonc, the physics laboratory of Claude Bernard University in Lyon, remade the experience of Eric Hoker, according to Mr. Valley indications and did not obtain the stated results by Eric of hoker. Mr. Vallée refused the verdict of scientists last 2 plot and spoke of the scientific community against his theory.

Myself, I sent to Mr. Valley, photocopying 2 theses 3 cycles, 2 research students, the phenomenon of "electron decoupled" from the tokamak torus, thermonuclear fusion Fontenay-aux-Roses. Theses Mr. Vallée totally ignored.

Benjamin LISAN (in November 2004).
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Looks like Nasa was aware of Michel Meyers work, here's a declassified nasa translation of The Science et Vie" nr.700 March 1976 article LOL

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19780007618.pdf
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
So Michel Meyer based his work on René Louis Vallée and his own work.

https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%25C3%25A9-Louis_Vall%25C3%25A9e&prev=search

Quote
In 1973 he did an experiment where he an electric current of 5 V and 300 kA sent through a plasma. It was found beta radiation to be released with energy levels of more than 6 MeV. Vallée argued that no theory or computational capabilities were to explain this result and postulated that the results had to be nuclear in origin, caused by impurities in the plasma.

loads more here
https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%25C3%25A9-Louis_Vall%25C3%25A9e&prev=search
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Dam it looks like J Naudin had this working

https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%25C3%25A9-Louis_Vall%25C3%25A9e&prev=search

At one point j naudin was reading over 17000 uSv/h, flying in an aeroplane exposes one to 5uSv/h there seem no doubt this is a free energy device in action producing copious amounts of Beta radiation and there is no fuel used at all  :D Surely this is the ultimate free energy device and is seen working.
« Last Edit: 2015-12-26, 21:58:44 by Peterae »
   
Group: Guest
Hello Peterae,

you have to go to this url here, there is a full document of Valle at the top of the list

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/synergetics.pdf

Explanation of the PROTELF PROCESS

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/protelf.htm


Test performed with alleged overunity-factor 3.46

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/vsg41.htm

regards

Mike
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Indeed Kator

Thanks for posting the links.

I have to question whether the beta is produced by the carbon rod or the spark interface, Arie DeGeus used a spark or hot plasma and tungsten as the catalyst to prduce beta through fusion of atoms, J.Naudin has the plasma and the tungsten catalyst.

I need a Geiger counter

It should be fairly easy to get a working device going, now that we know how to produce a stream of beta radiation, we learnt from McFreey that we can capture the energy in a resonant magnetic system, beta favours capture by the magnetic field, combining Arie, McFreey & Meyer i can see a working a device in a short period of time.

I'm a bit wary of the thorium use and the first thing is to shield with 3mm of aluminium to see how the radiation gets shielded as i dont want to be bombarded with X-rays or worse Gamma.

Mean while i will continue with my Meyer oscillator work over the Xmas holidays as i still favour a clean way to produce Beta instead of the dirty spark gap method of production here.

« Last Edit: 2015-12-28, 21:48:41 by Peterae »
   
Group: Guest
Peterae,

Once and awhile I restart my research on this subject and found this guy. I do not like to get too many different ideas to be infused here but this guy has made some important discovery and obviously can proove it.

The Snake River Radiadion Lab, Lawrence Dawson is a mathematician. There are four  introducing vids

Here are his two websides. I think its worth to study although I have to confess that the math is way beyon my head.
The main reason why I throw this in here is that he consideres an atom including the electron-shells as a spherical condenser.
By modifiacation of the electrical potential between the electron shell and the nucleus the nucleus becomes instable....

http://www.srnrl.com/
http://www.paradigmphysics.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArLRKvwy4_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXUohP67mzA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLbWaPQbROk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ezwSvpX8VY

Mike
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
Thanks Mike

Will look at it later when out of the Lab  O0

Cheers
Peter
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3975


Buy me some coffee
OK back to my NMR oscillator.

Had 1.5 Days so far playing around with this.
I managed to get the oscillator wired into an die cast box, i can switch between sweep(Adjustable up to 5 mins sweep) or 18 turn pot.

The output of the colpitts oscillator was never up to much and i know i needed to build a preamp as i could not even load it with a 50 Ohm resistor without a series feed resistor to stop distortion, it was a few hundred micro watts, now the 16 watt power stage i built needs an input of 300mw.

I built the power stage and it seems to work well see pictures below, based on an IRF610 fet.
Link here https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=50+mhz+irf610+amplifier+16+watt&biw=1280&bih=625&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjE0dyUoYTKAhVJvBQKHdYpBpwQ_AUIBygC&dpr=0.8#imgrc=4rpS2uTpcyEmqM%3A

So i tried this preamp stage here using transistors i had laying around
http://www.next.gr/circuits/ultra-broadband-buffer-amplifier-l39817.html
It worked but i should have converted 7dbm to watts and as it turns out it's a lot short of 300mw LOL

Anyway i connected the whole lot up to see how well it all performed, see scope shot below DS1Z

Scope shot
Yellow across a 50Ohm Load on power stage output.
Cyan Input to power stage after 2 transistor pre-amplifier.
Purple input to pre-amplifier stage which is the output of the colpitts oscillator.

So in conclusion, i need either a more powerful preamp or need another preamp added after the 1st preamp.

Anyone know how i can turn the gain up of the 2 transistor preamp, i tried dropping the 220 Ohm resistance down to 110 Ohm, not much happened really, i also tried 2 x 82 Ohm resistors in parallel in the emitter of the first transistor, again not much happened.

I have the feeling that my colpitts output is not enough to drive the preamp as i dont seem to get the 7 dbm (5mw) stated in the article, and anyway i still need to get to 300mw for the final stage drive.

I am in need of an easy to built preamp circuit if anyone has one.

Been fun but some what frustrating as well.


   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2025-04-01, 01:48:56
Loading...