Well i placed the answer in capital letters,and highlighted in red.
You simply decrease the magnetic field strength as that field approaches the stator(generating)coil,and increase the magnetic field strength as the field is leaving the the stator coil. This way ,the stator coil(inductor) thinks the magnetic field is leaving when it is approaching,and approaching when it is leaving. This is the very reason i made it very clear that timing of the brushes is critical.
I understand what you are suggesting, the problem is, you say that one:
"simply decrease the magnetic field strength as that field approaches the stator (generating coil....)"however, you don't show how you are accomplishing this in your basic demonstrations of the RT, before you started advancing the concept. The only thing folks witnessed was that a short was made on one of the stator coils, without the diode, with the diode in the incorrect direction, and with the diode in the correct direction. The basics are missing. From here we move to the second part of your statement where you say:
"and increase the magnetic field strength as the field is leaving the stator coil." The majority are left to assume that this latter part has something to do with the diode they were instructed to add. Much was demonstrated, but there is no clear description of what was shown, and why it was shown, simply put....purpose and method are lacking.
Then we are faced with your finial statement:
"This way, the stator coil (inductor) thinks the magnetic field is leaving when it is approaching, and approaching when it is leaving. This is the very reason I Made it very clear that timing of the brushes is critical."I completely understand whats being suggested here, however, the mechanism through which this is to be accomplished is missing. You mentioned that you made folks aware of the significance of timing, and where this is an important factor, it is not the factor in question which makes that which you suggest a reality. You reference the relation between the inducing and induced fields, but make no reference to the geometry of either and specifically the role of geometry has in generating the effect. In my opinion and experience, it is the geometry which facilities the production of the effect, timing is secondary. Timing is an issue here because of how these motors are designed and operated, here the term operated is a reference to how and when they are switched.
Myself and many others who do follow with an open mind, were/are of the understanding that this device was an advance on the principles demonstrated in the L.A.G. We understood that the RT was a demonstration of how the principles and concepts demonstrated in the aforenamed could be applied to existing technology. So far, it seems all that was promising in the L.A.G. is missing here.
So far those that have seen the effect,have seen the increasing field strength of the leaving field by using the diode so as the stator coil only conducts when the current flows in the correct direction.The segment of the rotor must be switched on at TDC of the stator core/coil.When it dose,the diode allows the stator coil to produce a current flow,and at the same time it builds a magnetic field that apposes that of the rotors field. This causes the rotor segment that is carrying that field to be pushed away-the motoring effect. We are not changing any laws of physics,we are simply reversing the action of that of a normal generator-decrease the field strength as that field approaches the generating coil,and increase the field strength as that field is leaving the generator coil.
As I understand how these motors work, the main reason why the rotor rotates is because of the quadrature relationship shared between the armature and stator fields. In this specific and or particular embodiment, (the RT) it is of little consequence that the stator is not energized, the stator is under the influence of the armature field and as such there will still be a quadrature relationship between the two, thus we experience rotation in the absence of an "energized" stator.
In regards to the generator action, as mentioned before there is a quadrature relation between the armature and stator fields. The armature field is configured and energized in a manner which results in a unidirectional field, this unidirectional field induces a unidirectional field into the stator via the inductive relations between the energized armature and the iron in the stator. Had the RT had been built using a pulse motor instead of a modified universal motor, it would have been as clear as the nose on a face that the induced wave appears as if it is rectified. One would have observed that the wave is asymmetric, it would have been observed that the polarity of the wave was directly related to the direction that the rotor is rotated in. This latter is not applicable to the RT, owing to how it is switched, and other factors, it can only operate in one direction effectively. When one considers the polarity of the wave, and the fact that it is asymmetrical, it becomes self explanatory what happens when a diode properly oriented is added to the already asymmetrical, magnetically rectified waveform.
This is what I wanted to hear from you.....I never heard it. I wasn't looking for you to tell me to look into the books to reexamine the laws, nor was I nor am I interested in numbers. I wanted you to share your view of how you see your machine functioning, nothing more nothing less. Now it doesn't really matter to me whether you do or not. But it does matter to a few here, and you owe it to yourself and to them to finish what you started, and to do so in manner that allows them to be able to sit at the bench with you as you walk them through your thinking. Its not about proving anything, or even about giving anyone anything, its about you sharing your impressions......or not.
Regards
Author
Topic: Some "New" Observations (Read 303980 times)
