@GK
Nice setup GK. I remember several years ago you were always on the cutting edge of this research. Are you still using tubes for amplification? I'll have to check out your build thread and get back to you, so I don't ask redundant questions. Interesting diagram.... have you tried three or four control coils instead of two? Or is the idea to simplify and search for anomalies?
Maybe the PureDate heterodyning program I wrote the other night can help you...
I got the idea for square wave heterodyning off you from a few years ago, y'know...
http://feynmanslab.com/docs/@AllPhase
Remember that SM complained a lot that his TPUs would only work for about 20 minutes, due to EXCESSIVE HEAT.
Exactly. I re-read the full documents again the other night, which I have uploaded here:
http://feynmanslab.com/docs/tpu/Therefore, I would "surmise" that was due to HIGH CURRENT FLIP FLOPPING back & forth between his Ferrite Core & the Outer TPU.
Where forms the basis for your evidence of a ferrite core? Or is this an operating assumption? Anyway I'm not sure what you mean by 'flip-flopping' , but I think the heating could have been caused by induction of large amounts of current into the collector coils. See Appendix A
Since Electrical Heat requires High Current, Can we further "surmise" that PUNY LITTLE Circuit Chips operating in Milliamps are NOT THE SOLUTION.
The heat was likely generated by the collector coils, not the control coils. "Puny chips" are not a problem if we protect them with optoisolators and shielding. I agree in the sense that we should consider doing amplifications with tube (12AX7, 6L6, etc) circuits and RLCs rather than MOSFETs and semiconductors, but both technologies have their merits. I would not exclude or discard either one.
We are seeking an anomolous electromagnetic phenomenon -- somehow related to magnetic and/or scalar energy -- an undeniably a phenomenon with a rotational component . I am sure there are multiple paths to the same result.
In hindsight, the field is littered with NON WORKING TPUs that have been tried over the past 4 or 5 years.
This is true, besides Bob Boyce's TPU -- if you believe his claims which have leaked, and I have posted earlier.
Before the Wright brothers flew at Kitty Hawk, the man-attempting-flight field was littered with NON WORKING PLANES that had been tried over the past 4000 years prior. It doesn't mean it's impossible or that we should give up.
Notice the Ferrite Core on SM's 8 inch TPU. The ARROW points right to it.
This video is really grainy. For me, it could go either way. Do we even know what the beige thing is? Furthermore, this reminds me: Does anyone have the high-quality copies of the SM TPU videos? I will host them on my server
http://feynmanslab.com if someone gives me a copy. I want the original ones that Mannix posted that were over a GB.
Here's the deal. If we cannot figure out the wiring configuration between the Ferrite Core & main TPU, we don't have a chance folks. Sorry.
This is a really defeatist attitude. First of all, we can't even be sure there is a ferrite core until we examine the video more closely. Second, we don't need to try to 'copy' the TPU exactly... there are plenty of ways to experiment with rotating scalar and/or rotating electromagnetic energy.
There is more than one way to skin a Tesla. If we got the wiring correct, we could easily just investigate the connections via brute force, or with the assistence of a computer, relays, and a microcontroller.
Series
[without coil polarity]
-*-C1--- -*-C2--- -*-C3---
-*-C1--- -*-C3--- -*-C2---
-*-C2--- -*-C3--- -*-C1---
-*-C2--- -*-C1--- -*-C3---
-*-C3--- -*-C1--- -*-C2---
-*-C3--- -*-C2--- -*-C1---
C = number of coils
n = C ! (C Factorial) , for 3 coils in series with no polarity
n = 6 coil wiring paths
Now I'm going to attempt to calculate how many 3 coils in series with polarity we could have, I know this is wrong, but I think it's an upper bound on the number of possibilities,
[with coil polarity]
n_p = 3 * 2 * 1
n_p = (3*2) * (2*2) * (1*2)
n_p = 6 * 4 * 2
n_p = 24 * 2
n_p = 48 wiring max, for 3 coils in series with polarity
Anyway, we can probably automate the wiring possibilities if we need to. No doubt we could automate the testing of frequencies, harmonics, phase, and so forth.
Heating Appendix A:
Anyway Consider this: IF the heating was due to conventional physics, it might have been because of current induction in the collector coils. From Wikipedia :
"The total amount of heat energy released over a period of time can be determined from the integral of the power over that period of time:
Okay , simple enough. I think this means the any power induced into the collector coils which is not consumed by the load ends up as heat. This probably happens regardless of the 'source' of the energy (quantum effects, earth magnetic field, higgs boson, gravitrons, whatever), and probably just depends on the energy type.
Consider 1 meter of 6AWG wire. If i remember, some of the collector coils in SM video look pretty thick, so I'm going to go with 6AWG as a ball-park guess, since 6AWG is about 4.75mm in diameter. One meter of 6AWG wire has a resistance of 0.0013 Ohms (R).
Wire Resistance Calculator
http://www.stealth316.com/2-wire-resistance.htm
Example of 6AWG wire , black on the right
Let's pretend for a minute that the TPU collector coil is in a closed loop , with only itself as a load (R = 0.0013 in collector coil). Yes I know that means the wires are connected end to end. Who knows maybe , this is how it was configured.
We know one of Steven Mark's TPU puts out 62V of potential on the collectors, which often was used to run a load.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHswoNpc0Tk[/youtube]
We know:
V= 62V
R = 0.0013 Ohms on copper wire in closed loop configuration
Scenario #1: TPU collector R=0.0013V=IR
I = V / R , so
I = 62V / 0.0013Ohms
I = 47,692 Amps!
Using P = VI , then we find:
P = 62V * 47,692 Amps
P = 2.9 million watts
Lol. Okay so I just want to make a point here about theoretical maximum in closed-loop TPU collector coils, assuming we are tapping a nearly infinite supply of energy, whatever the underlying phenomenon. This is probably why both Bob Boyce and Steven Mark talk about burning up their devices, exploding wires, etc. If you are talking about generating a reasonable potential voltage (62V) through a small resistance (0.0013 Ohms), the circuit will 'suck up' huge amounts of energy.
This is the same reason a battery heats up burning hot to the touch if you short the leads, or lamp wires spark and melt if you short-circuit the 120VAC through copper wire. The 'source' tries to keep up with Ohms Law , and in the process, generates lots and lots of heat.
Now that was just considering the collector coil is a closed loop of 6AWG copper wire. Let's pretend we did the same thing, but with a 1 Ohm power resistor.
Scenario #2: TPU collector R=1.0013 OhmsTPU Collector , with 1 Ohm power resistor in series:
V=IR
I = V / R , so
I = 62V / 1.0013 Ohms
I = 61.9 AmpsThis well exceeds the number of amps for power transmission for 6 AWG wire (37 Amps max according to this link):
http://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htmSo it's possible , depending on the required wiring, for a TPU to generate lots of heat using conventional physics assuming we are tapping a nearly infinite source of current.
Of course, it's always possible the heat was being produced by a new physics effect, since the TPU is not known to conventional physics.
Author
Topic: Some "New" Observations (Read 303976 times)
