@Poynt99,
Regardless if it is so-called new or old technology, I find it very difficult to understand why any claimant would choose not to demonstrate the veracity of their claim. In fact, if it was myself, given my considerable experience in the free energy community, and my own logical, skeptical yet open-minded perspective, it would not be necessary for anyone to request proof in the form of test data, as it would be provided pre-emptively in my very first or second post coinciding with my claim. I would fully expect to be asked to provide test data, and rightly so.
Not volunteering or not providing substantive proof upon request only fuels suspicion that the claimant may be fabricating their claim. I for one would not want to be in that position. Having said that, I am in awe of various members of forums where the degree of tolerance for unsubstantiated claims is astonishing. I see this both on OU and OUR. And it is wort mentioning that OUR generally has a zero tolerance policy for un substantiated claims (as per the terms of servicecsection), but in this particular case the admin has decided to give substantial leeway to the claimant. Why? Because eventually the readers and replicators will objectively vet the claim, and the veracity of the said claim will be revealed to all. In the process all will hopefully have learned something, in one form or the other.
.99
I agree and sympathise with your pain, but, how many times in history have people provided Demonstrations, free runners, all very simple devices that are clearly easy to build for anyone skilled in the Engineering profession, and how many have tried and failed. nearly all of them!
Why would this be?
Not because it doesn't work, but because one does not understand!
If I gave you all my Data like Bill Alek has, would I be better off?
Absolutely Not! Why? Because that's not enough for you to be able to make it work! It would be: "Measurement Error" or "Its Power from the Power Lines" or "Power from the Local Radio Station" or "Hidden Battery" the list of foolish rubbish goes on for days...
Two guys here, are the best replications to date! I was going to name them but this is not fair on them! They possibly are already OU. They have listened, paid attention, read the Data I have provided and not let out a single scream, cry, winge, objection, or anything of the like. They just built and Learned!
These Guys have done their bit! Used Intuition!
Don't you think that your "Experience" would tell you that something is Right or Wrong? Mine does. What's your Gut tell you Poynt99? Why have you followed this, for this long, if you think its a fake?
You know how frustrated I get Poynt99 with people that don't listen and pay attention! Then Cry and carry on like Juvenile's! Really if those that don't like it, simply don't follow it! Go away and read the local paper. I don't care!
If you want a Cup of Water you don't go to the Desert do you? Lenz's Law is considered nearly a
1:1 Ratio of Negative Force in all Generators, we have to put more in, to get an output - Why? What is Lenz's Law?
Some are so assfixiated on OU that they will "
Miss" what's really going on in the device! Like I have said
MANY TIMES!!! Get it working first! Learn what's going on first then improve on it!
The foolish people running at 40KHz or above will end up failing as they just have not paid attention! They simply think they know better - what a joke
Ever heard of Inductor Time Constant?
I have had perhaps 30 people that clearly know what they are talking about, say: "don't bother, you're wasting your time! They just wont get it!"
I really am starting to feel the same way!