@Erfinder
I am posting this here instead of on the intended Flux Gate Interrupter, BEMF Redirector thread to not clutter it and also to keep some flow of posts I make in one location. This thread will do just fine from now on so I will always use this thread even if responding to other threads that I will identify as well.
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2678.msg44058#msg44058Yes, yes and yes. Topology is the most important aspect of any device since it integrates all the present understandings of the builder to arrive at a certain level of simplicity or sophistication, does not matter. Change or add one base understanding and the topology will eventually change as well.
In @gotolucs' present build, some of the realities are;
1) The two C cores that are mounted on the drill chuck are welded together without any isolation materials to prevent crossing or cancellation zones in the armature that again would be very difficult to predict in the way the two cores are joined.
2) The coil has a pretty big neo magnet smack dab inside its belly so you now have a permanent orientation of the four bar armatures that will be very difficult to change any form of polarity shifting just with the passage of the two "shorted" rotating C cores.
3) Regardless of any topology, given the fact that the copper coil has zillions of atoms, in any type of build you will always have some level of output so just because a system produces output, it does not mean it is optimal.
4) The copper coil is tightly wound mag wire so you will always have inter wind cancellation that adds to the reduction of output. You do not need many winds and layers.
Example: You have a coil of 200 turns in 4 layers. The first layer is the closest and will feel the polarity changes in the core and also cloak the 2nd and other layers from the core impress proportionate to the impress the first layer received. After that it's a game of chance and push (sway, swing or spin) in one direction but now that energy has to pass through 3 additional layers and this is where we start to make our own problems.
Coil winding is an elastic sport. Many turns and layers produces higher voltage but lower amperage because amperage can only be the number of atoms in a given length of wire that react to a given impulse. So because you want higher voltage, you wind more turns that create more cancellation that reduces the amperage but increases the voltage.
The mundane task of winding coils is not so mundane in the transformer industry where best performance is a constant give and take of specs. The final objective is what is prime. You look at what you have as input and what you need as output and wind your coil accordingly without any real interest in efficiency because manipulating anything any more then that is not really on our books yet.
The logical method is guys will determine what the coil is required to output then wind a coil for that specific reason while bitting the bullet on amperage for each addition turn of the wire.
If you where to put yourself right inside the copper wire and could see the atoms and how they are arranged, the first thing you will realize is there are many defective atoms in the wire that have oblong forms where the center core cannot spin, but has enough elbow room to sway or with more room, to swing. So not all copper atoms are created equal. This you know when considering isotopes of any given element are slight variations of the main element. But you have so many copper atoms of all types, some almost perfectly round, others not but there is enough of everything for you to sweep your frequency generator and see different reactions and outputs at varying frequencies because at certain frequencies some more of the atoms can spin then others.
According to spin conveyance, super conductivity works in this way. The low temperature is enough to freeze some of the weaker atoms and holds them in check while the more perfect atoms can now spin without having the weaker frozen atoms that create a cancellation, so the freer atoms are left to spin without any hindrance. Super conductivity is the elimination of cancellation and in the freeze method, they are not really canceled but prevented to sway or swing which prevents them from spinning against the main impulse spin that now has free reign over all those atoms that can spin. So our wires work the same way. We have good atoms and bad atoms and in between atoms and all of them will react inside the wire at a given frequency. When I say spin, I always mean sway, swing or spin.
Resonance point is when all those atoms that can spin, do so. If looking at a clock, you have sway where the atomic core sways anywhere between 1 minute to 29 minutes or 31 minutes to 59 minutes, swing goes anywhere from 1 minute to 59 minutes or 31 minutes to 29 minutes, and spin occurs when the pulse timing is such that the swing has enough inertia to pass the 0 minute mark and continues in the same direction. You cannot get swing from 60 hertz. This will be enough to sway or swing the atoms since it is AC so both polarity impresses are fully controlled. Wonder why the army uses 400 hertz? Since the copper wire has less fully spinable atoms, then swing atoms and less swings atoms then sway atoms, when you get up to the resonance frequencies, those less spinable atoms will spin but produce much less amperage and this explains in the physical sense why resonance outputs are more reactive, higher volts (faster spin) low amps (less atoms spinning). It is the wire itself that cannot provide any more available spinable atoms to increase the amperage and that is exactly what we see on our benches everyday since 150 years. This is not a fault in method but materials.
So let's go again to the atoms scale and are able to see through the cross-section of the wire. The atoms at the bottom point where the wire and the core meet are at the closest impress, the atoms on the top curve of the wire are furthest away from the core and already at that small perceived distance for us, in the atomic scale could equal a distance of more then 2 football fields in human terms. So just that first layer of winding already has surpassed the practical distances that a perfect wire needs to become fully impressed. The fact that wire is round provides the builder with an even thinner layer of wire closest to the core so the wire never actually has full contact to the core.
If anyone is interested in seeing what the ramifications of this are, take any core, wind a primary of one layer, then over that another primary of one layer, then over that another primary of one layer. Then on another part of the core wind a secondary of one layer and on top of that another secondary of one layer and on top of that a third layer. So you have three primaries and three secondaries. Now play by pulsing the first layer primary and scope the first layer secondary, then scope only the second layer secondary, then only the third layer secondary and keep a log of results. Then pulse the second layer primary and scope again the secondaries. Then pulse the third layer primary and do the secs. Then pulse the 1st and 2nd layer primaries in series and scope again the secs. Then pulse again the 1st and 2nd layers but in parallel and scope the secs, then pulse the 1st, 2nd and 3rd primaries in series and scope the secs. Then put them in parallel and scope the secs. Then start over again but now put the 1st and 2nd secondaries in series, and scope them with the primary variables again. Then put the secondaries in parallel and do it again. The put the 1st, 2nd and 3rd secondaries in series and scope it again with all the primary variables. Once you have gone through all the possible variables and have tabled all the different data, all based on these same pieces of copper wire, it will start to show a portrait of exactly how each layer will change the dynamics of how energy is pulsed and removed from the system. Just this study would say so much of why and how we should be using our copper wire.
Why is Litz wire found to be the best wire for resonance? Because both that small insulation per wire (doubled with turns) is enough to prevent most of the inter wire cancellation and the very thin wire means a reduction in the less performing copper atoms around those atoms that can actually spin so you have a better super conductive reaction although it is still far from perfect.
I guess all this boils down to watts. 20 watts can be generated at 100 volts and .2 amps or 10 volts at 2 amps. Both of these can be outputed by changing your wire turns but regardless, you will always get 20 watts. The thing is, does your system need 100 volts at .2 amps or are you trying to loop a 10 volts system, where using the former you will have to step it down and loose more efficiency. If the wire you are using is good till 200 watts, why do you care how it is served. You are always better off with the fewest copper wire turns possible.
Nature does not over build to then tear down. It builds only what is required to meet the task so the design has to start from step one to establish what are the working parameters desired and how can this be achieved using the least amount of wire possible, that will generate the least amount of cancellation potential possible in order to return the maximum amount of power back to the source.
Most of these observations of my own effects on the bench were never realized until I started realizing that Spin Conveyance played a more practical and physical role in how we play with our toys. This was just impossible for me to realize a few years ago when this was only a flicker of thought but today, these effects are becoming more and more "explainable" in the atomic sense for it to make human sense, much more then any current/voltage formulas could ever do. But once you start to equate formulas with actual physical reactions in copper wire the device starts to come alive and the human to machine intuitiveness increases by leaps and bounds.
If you could sort copper atoms and use only the most perfectly round atoms to produce FLAT, thin copper wire, this would be a huge leap forward in the evolution of conductive materials and these wires would produce OU very easily. But right now, it is like OUers are working with one arm tied to the back while fighting very hard for a knock out. So imagine going back a hundred years, what the quality of copper was then while they produced most of the EE laws. Give us better materials and we will rewrite those laws. One guy we all know summed it up very well as "wire is very important". Guess whoooooooooooooo? (Five point question.)
If there was a way to produce copper or any other conductive wire in the same manner as they produce aligned steel laminations, this would be such a plus. I would guess such wire is already available, copper or otherwise, but it is not available to the public. I guess if there was a way to reheat wire red hot and produce a magnetic influence on only one side of the wire as it cools, this will realign the copper atoms to a more favorable singular angle, this will provide more atoms that will react in the same way, hence produce more output as amperage at the same voltage. I'm not there yet. hehehe
Overunity will not be achieved by EE alone. Guys have to have touched on physics, alchemy, metallurgy, chemistry, engineering, astro physics and so many other disciplines in order to understand the vastness and the base simplicity of all the potential effects around us because each is interrelated to the atom itself. If you are stuck in Standard EE alone, it would be practically impossible for anyone to pass the mental OU threshold without major major luck.
Sorry for long post.
wattsup
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Critical Thinking (Read 51106 times)
