Yes.
But I am not sure you understand the concept of doughnut patenting. My guess is that you are so wrapped up with yourself that you are not going to listen to people who may have been round the block rather more times than you have.
Paul-R,
This time, the MAIN reason for my response is to ALERT all readers here to be aware of WHAT is going on and WHY.Since you just won't drop this issue, I am going to “rub it in”, for the last time!
First of all,
I am NOT the slightest bit interested in ANY 'patenting concepts', "doughnut" or otherwise!!
Second,
I am old enough to take care of myself without “advice” from a self-appointed 'Nanny'!Further,
I can clearly see your 'agenda' here.
You have nothing of value to contribute.On the contrary, you needed some
dumb excuse to disrupt and derail the topic being discussed here
with your diversion tactics.Just like you tried over at 'overunity.com' where I posted the Dropbox links to my project Folders!
Because you could not find a better excuse, you accused me of “hijacking” that thread, the very thread where I have posted many times before!
Pathetic performance!
For all to see, here is that “exchange”: Re: Selfrunning HHO system with 400 Watts additional output
« Reply #468 on: June 21, 2014, 03:28:30 PM »
Quote
Quote from: Les Banki on June 21, 2014, 05:48:47 AM
Stefan Hartman, (the owner of this Forum) started this thread.
He presented (posted) the link to the video by Oliver & Valentin.
***********************************
***********************************
***********************************
Yes, he did. - It is about the Anton cell.Why have you hi-jacked it?
Start your own thread. Leave this to Anton researchers.
***********************************
***********************************
***********************************
.
Report to moderator Logged
Les Banki
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Re: Selfrunning HHO system with 400 Watts additional output
« Reply #469 on: June 22, 2014, 03:38:23 AM »
Quote
Just WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM, Paul-R??
I have made it VERY CLEAR in my introductory post WHY I choose to post in this thread which has been DEAD for 2 1/2 years!
But it seems you have some problems READING and UNDERSTANDING....
You only want to ARGUE.
The Anton cell has been MENTIONED a couple of times but NOBODY has claimed that THIS thread is about the Anton cell!
In case you haven't discovered, there is a thread SPECIFICALLY for the Anton cell.
In any case, this is the LAST time I respond to your USELESS ravings!
Cheers,
Les Banki
You have also under-estimated my memory.
For your information, I am familiar with patent laws and rules since the time I was assisting a friend with a patent application about 20 years ago.
The deliberate scare tactics started many, many years ago to try to prevent inventors publishing their ideas and results!
The simple fact remains that
no-one can patent ANYTHING which has been previously published in any way prior to the application!Nowadays, every web site (NO exceptions!) have a multitude of 'logs'!
Thus, it is dead simple to prove
PRIOR PUBLICATION date!!Once 'prior publication' is discovered, the application(s) will be instantly
CANCELLED and if a patent has already been granted, it will immediately be made
NULL and VOID!
In case you choose to still argue any of the above points, you are on your own and
I dare say you are not very bright!Cheers,
Les Banki
Author
Topic: electrolysis with nano-pulse power supply (Read 304463 times)
