@tinman
Welcome to the OUR forum where free energy sanity may reside and where discussion is "usually" based on a higher modicum of mutual respect. hahaha
I had put up a drawing at OU to show you the dynamic difference in form between your coil test and the magnet test. There was no comments. Fine.
Look, just take a tall glass of water. Place your magnet on a small base so it is about 1" above the bottom. Then drop a BromoSeltzer in the water that will produce air bubbles that should saturate the volume of water. Then tell us if the bubbles spin on their own over the magnet like you showed in your first vids.
Calcium Hypochlorite (swimming pool shock treatment) will also produce only fine air bubbles since this reverts to oxygen when in contact with water, but it has a very stringent smell so your room has to be well aerated. (Actually I use that to make pills that I ingest once in a while to increase oxygen content to fight of bacteria, virus and parasites. It's called MMS2 - hahaha). Works great.
The other methods for producing bubbles without using any electrical impulse on plates that may be leaving behind a remnant charge on the bubbles that then reacts to the magnet while rising up the sidewall are,
- Small air pump pushes air through a submerged air diffuser to produce micro bubbles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pGXlrrzjYThis video is great because it also shows the difference between regular water and salted water at 2% (sea water is about 3.2% or 32,000 ppm salt content). When the salt water tank if fully saturated and the bubbles are almost standing still in the water, that is the only time a magnet should be submerged into the tank to see if there is a vortex on the top that occurs on its own, without any direct source of atom splitting producing rising bubbles as experimented thus far. Notice the right tank is producing some vortexes.
- Small water pump with a small venturi that creates micro bubbles as water flows through the venturi.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4czczYnuM_wI tried to explain to @TA about the bubbles and how to test. I tried to explain to him about his TV screen and how a magnet effects the screen but the visible fine patterns he sees are not indicative of any same fine patterns exiting the magnet. I tried to explain to him about ferrofluid and the dynamics of fluid surface tension and that his ideas have to hold against a myriad of natural conditions and they do not, but despite all this, not one direct comment was produced by him that held any logic save his same responses. That says it all man, this guy is like a diode, one way in, one way out. There is no going back, no possible change of notions, no possible consideration of alternative perspectives, only his and only his way. That only leads to dead ends for everyone. You see, if he would have rebutted my comments with some perfectly understandable and logical notions, I am more then open to change and not afraid of modifying my own ideas when they better fit nature. But he cannot, so his best strategy is to just continue on as he is doing while insulting people left right and center.
So tell me, when you see the sand in the dessert producing fine sandy waves, is it the wind that is doing this alone as a top impinged wave pattern or is it the wind direction based on the given sand particle size that are reacting to the wind and producing those waves. @TA would say the wind just created the sandy waves from one vertical drop of wavy air patterns. Go figure.
So..............I won't be posting any more on his OU thread simply because @TA does not want to talk. All he is doing is repeating the same talking points, same words, same sentences, same lingo, all to say nothing and ultimately, all I am doing is wasting my time. This origin topic is top on my study list since many years and I was really looking forward to scramble brainwaves with someone I thought had something to say. If I wanted to engage in such "diodeisms", I'd buy a parrot and teach it my own words and sentences to be repeated back to me 100 times a day. I don't need @TA for that. All @TA is doing is describing what he sees and not what the reasons of the effects are. So he says there is a big dance around the magnets, one side hoot'in, the other side holler'in and all this creates a mass interplay of fields upon fields upon fields that is PROVEN by the patterns on the TV screen. hahaha. What a total joke. I am very disappointed because I thought he had more substance then that.
But at least while preparing my second to last post over there, I finally discovered where the problem was, now as clear as wiping a dusty window to see through it at last and I will be developing my final exposure of what I consider is the central pivot to all EE, and that is Spin Conveyance. Remember these two words man. They will change how we see EE. Man have we been wrong, we have managed to over complicate the simple and it's time to bring simple back, like when Tesla was around.
In actual fact, I don't give two f&*ks what @TA thinks or does because I know the actual readers out there, after so many years many have learned how to "read between the lines" while others will just gobble up anything. I cannot change the latter and will not even try. hahaha
wattsup
PS: @GK, thanks for the PMs. I really needed them at this time. I'm checking your back man, always. I'll be on your thread soon and have some great stuff to explain there about SM. Maybe just to say, I've always wanted SM to be real. But my pragmatic and logical side only wants the truth and has no place for hope, so all I can do is be real to who I am, as I am and just roll with the punches. If we wind up discovering both OU and also that SM was a fake (or not), then SM would indeed still have played a role in all of it either directly or indirectly, by the force of things, he would have some influence either as a direction or misdirection leading to the end result. In an way, SM forced us to leave our standard mindset and learn to think out of the box. Thanks again.
Author
Topic: TinMans magnet experiments (Read 15170 times)
