slider said: Do you have an LED circuit that would raise the bar here ? Something we might in fact assist LS with, by replicating ? It would cut the stumble, which is a very good point if we can build on and with that library. Unfortunately there is no bar or standard goal except perhaps run time. Power output of the lights is not "standardized" or even measured as a goal. Is the LED visible in a darkened room? in normal light? in outdoor sunlight? under a microscope? Is there a standard LED to be used by participants? Nor is voltage and current input measured. If you are only looking at uA draw it is only a part the story. P=ExI For a contest or to see if one is really making progress, it is necessary to nail down some of the parameters e.g most optical power delivered for one hour by XXX type battery or xxx uf capacitor. Besides accurate measurement, you need to take lab notes to see if you are really making an improvement. Be it a soap box or formula race, certain constraints are needed to be spelled out. If there are no constraints or no goals, then it is easy. So I will ask slider and all few questions for starters. Right now the goal is nebulous. Define exactly the goal. Which of these would be a viable constraint or goal: Power input Run time Amount of optical power delivered (How is the output measured eye or sensitive light meter, peak or average power?) Number of active components allowed Number of passive components allowed Size of the assembly* Weight of the assembly* *(including power source) It is well known in the art that pulsing an LED can be a large advantage in apparent light output to the eye over steady DC current so LS's latest video and test is not a revelation. That is one of the reasons multiplexed LED displays have been popular for the last 45 years or so.
« Last Edit: 2014-05-15, 15:06:42 by ION »
---------------------------
"Secrecy, secret societies and secret groups have always been repugnant to a free and open society"......John F Kennedy
|