Any ideas who sent this to Mannix? Who does it sound like? Greetings, Mr. Mannix:
My name is Not for publication. For several years I have been building my own designs for
motors and replications of mainly Bedini-type energizers and circuits. Indeed, I have about five
iterations running at any one time. I have closely followed the efforst of Stefan Harman, Edwin
Badertscher, Jean-Loius Naudin, Marcus Wagner, Paul Lindemann, and several others through
different cooperative building groups and have contributed myself.
I believe through my own building efforts and research, I have learned a great deal about
electromagnetic circuits.
I took about a week and pored through every single post in the long string of posts concerning Mr.
Steven Mark and his invention. The simple elegance of his device left me speechless. It makes
perfect sense to me. (I was educated a long time ago as a EE)
Here is what I perceive in his power toroidal device, and I will try to make this concise and
sensical:
1. When one builds a bifilar coil, using one winding for power, and one for trigger, and
drive this with a transistor, there is a certain point, when you bring a magnet close to one
end of the coil, you will get a loud squealing noise from the coil. This feedback is the
result of the trigger and power coil constantly switching the power transistor used to drive
that coil off and on again. It is also a point where that coil/transistor combination produce
a high voltage output which one can gather from the collector of the transistor. If left
unchecked, this resonant frequency of on/off switching will burn up the transistor, and
thus a resistor must be put into the trigger winding circuit to lessen the voltage produced
in the winding. It is one element of what I believe is happening in the Mark device.
2. When one places several coils around a toroid, one can think of switching from one to
the next, preferably sequentially, the minimum number of coils being three. In this case
one could use the trigger winding from one coil to turn on the power of the second coil,
the trigger from the second to the third power, the third trigger to the power winding of the
first coil.
3. Flux can switch directions within a ferrous material instantaneously and some say
superluminally. It takes very little switching power to flip flux "bundles" from one
direction to another, given that there is a good path for the flux to move through. The
toroid is perfect for this. If one were to turn on a magnetic field in one coil, that flux
permeates most of the toroid, but more importantly is perceived by the next coil. This in
turn triggers that coil to operate, and the first coil field is shut down. In this way, one
could use coils to move the flux in PULSES around the toroid. This switching from coil to
coil, accomplished with low power, high voltage pulses occurs at a natural frequency of
the circuit and that frequency that can be handled by the power transistors.
4. The high voltage, low power is a result of the "kick" whereof Steve Mark speaks. It was
most clearly described by Nikola Tesla, when he observed a very high voltage spike at the
VERY INSTANT a DC switch was closed. In fact he spoke of people being killed by this
spike. Such a spike (though lower in magnitude) happens within a transistor at the very
instant its gate is closed to allow power to course through it. I learned of this in vacuum
tubes from my dad when he taught me how to build my first Heathkit shortwave radio in
1963. He said: "Whenever possible, leave the radio on - it doesn't consume much power,
but the startup surges will quickly burn up your tubes."
5. When a coil is thus activated, initially it creates a very powerful magnetic spike.
Imagine that this can even be more amplified if the transistor is turned on only to close the
gate of a silicone controlled rectifier, in order to dump a small capacitor very suddenly
through the coil.
6. It becomes easy to see that when one talks about the switching ability of transistors,
5kHz is perfectly reasonable, switching from one coil to the next.
7. Next we have the challenge of making the many pulses of magnetic power
unidirectional. As we all know current running through a wire creates a circular magnetic
field centered about that wire. This also answers the old question you posed on one of
your posts as to why a set of jumper cables jumps when shorted across the battery
terminal. Well, first, the direction of current is opposite in the two leads, thereby
quadrupling the magnetic force in the narrow space between the two wires. This powerful
magnetic "linear" flux concentration between the cables then tries to orient itself to the
ambient earths magnetic flux lines, and hence, jumps. Note, however, that there is more at
play here. The VERY INSTANT you connect the cable to the battery, you also have that
very high voltage spike whereof Tesla spoke. This spike has a large Radiant Energy
component to the electricity. It contributes a great deal to the powerful magnetic pulse.
8. Back to unidirectional flux in the toroid. In order to create a mainly DC current in
windings around part or all of the toroid, we must now ensure the flux moves in ONE
direction. Well, the placement of a magnet at right angles to the flow around the toroid
would tend to make the flux take a preferential direction. The flux of a controlling coil in a
flux-gating device such as some of the Joe Flynn devices is quite weak, but exerts
enormous directional control on even very powerful flux. This is the concept exploited in
the design of the newest patent of the Magnetic Power Module. (Interestingly, it appears
to be a derivation of Steven Mark's efforts....) Thus, instead of using additional small coils
to make the toroidal flux take one preferred direction as compared to the other can be
acco0mplished by the use of a ferrite magnet, as seen in the videos (I, too have watched
them numerous times.)
9. Now to the question of the little pieces of wire and the magnet. I don't remember
anyone answering this to your or Mr. Mark's satisfaction. Let me have a go. When you
move a magnet across a wire you generate a current in that wire. However, what was not
iterated is that the amount of current generated is not only a matter of the strength of the
magnet, but rather the SPEED and distance at which that magnet is moved across that
wire. Thus when we speak of moving the magnet across a small piece of wire at the speed
of a gunshot, you generate a very sudden, high voltage spike in that little piece of wire.
Conversely, if you could move that wire crossways through even a weak magnetic field
with few flux likes, you could generate a voltage spike. In essence Mark is doing this in
his toroid. He states he is running at about 5kHz. For four coils (like the one that is open
on the cardboard box in his garage with two lamps), he may be banging two opposed coils
simultaneously with spikes, with the magnet forcing one direction, or he is running them
sequentially. For the sequential version, that would mean the "magnetic flux North" (for
lack of a better way to describe it) passes one spot in the toroid 1250 times per second.
The RPM of the flux would therefore be AT LEAST 75,000RPM. Can you imagine the kind
of power you might generate from Neo magnets in an armature near windings if you
COULD rev that puppy up to 75,000RPM? Only this toroid has no back EMF when a load is
put on the wires.
10. Remember I was talking about SPEED of the magnet passing the wires playing a
significant role in the voltage produced. If we take the above example of 75,000 RPM, it is
easy to calculate for a 14" diameter toroid, that the actual speed of the magnet "flying"
past the wires at a very close range would be 3,123.74 statute miles per hour or 4,581.5
ft/second. Compare this to the bullet of a high powered rifle at 2,800 ft/sec.
11. One need only to add all the little pieces of wire, which are now individual loops of
wire around the toroid's ring itself to see why the toroid generates such enormous
voltages and currents. Needless to say, toroidal coils, like any coil have a preferred
resonant frequency. If the toroidal coil is tuned to the "kick" frequency or pulsed
frequency, one can see that this thing would put out scary amounts of power.
12. I shall make a stab here and say that these toroids DO NOT heat up until a load is put
on the output wires. It would intuitively make sense that this heating is not only due to
current flow within the toroid off-take winding, but also due to the new magnetic field that
would result within the toroid, due to the DC current now flowing around it. Strangely,
using the left hand rule for magnetism, this toroid is an aberration. Because when one
thinks of the current beginning the flow through a load, the magnetic flux this winding
creates is ADDITIVE to the pulsing magnetic flux created by the coils.
13. When we look at the earth's magnetic field, there are some weird things to look at.
Does a high-speed rotational flux field draw or lense or concentrate flux lines into a Mark
device? Maybe that is exactly what it does. This simply ADDS more density to the field.
However, something else strikes me more simply. Mark has set up his terrific sequential
pulsed magnetic field with a small battery (who cares if there is a battery - that point is
moot when you look at the power out) which rotates nearly twice as fast as the bullet from
a high powered rifle. It creates enormous numbers of flux lines crossing wires per
second. That is key and it takes little power. Once power is established, one could take a
tiny amount from the output and run the circuit, so again the battery is moot. The main
thing is the device's strange reaction to physical movement. I attribute this to the
ENORMOUS impact of the SPEED at which the magnetic flux moves.
14. We see how even small flux density, when accelerated to very high speed, can STILL
generate current in conductors, be they wires or even flat surfaces. Whe we talk about
these effects, we understand that ANY magnetic device, be it a simple magnet compass or
object, will try to orient itself to the earth's magnetic field. Try and experiment. See how a
magnetized needle in a match turns slowly to north in a cup of water. Now take a strong
neodymium magnet and tape a piece of thread to it and let it hang. Note how QUICKLY and
how STRONGLY it orients itself to the earth's field. What Mark appears to have proven is
that one can create the effect of higher strength of a magnet through speed of movement
of the field. And the field appears to be strengthened drastically by the ADDITIVE pulses
of the coils pumping the toroid up to saturation.
15. To me the reason that the toroid appears to "judder" as one attempts to move the
toroid across the table is straightforward. As the field rotates, there is a point in the
device where the rotating field (perhaps rotating is the wrong word) better, field in its
racetrack, is oriented in direct opposition to the Earth's magnetic field. On the
diametrically opposite side, the field is perfect attraction to the earth's field. This means
that pushing the device North and South would have the most pronounced juddering or
washboard effect. However, going crossways to N_S may also have weird effects, the flux
lines moving at right angles to one another. I would tend to say this might be even more
pronounced when a big load is put on the output coil, if my above assumption is correct
with the inner ADDITIVE flux under load.
16. It makes sense that if we are moving a relatively weak magnetic field at very high RPM
or lap rate, then perhaps we are now also talking about a gravitic interaction. Since it
appears that gravity and spinning superconducting magnets are related, and we are
spinning this field at a VERY high rate, then the orientation on startup is most likely also
directly interacting with "gravitons?" I won't go there, as I know too little about the field.
Suffice it to say, that gravity is directional, be it into the earth or into space from the
earth's center. Either way it is directional. Inverting the toroid MAY then be affected in
operation or stopped when it is inverted. Has Steven Mark solved this? It sounds
SOOOOO interesting. And naturally, with smaller toroids, he is also talking about higher
angular acceleration of the field, due to the smaller diameter. Maybe this also has a
bearing on the trait?
17. The imploding television story is very interesting. Could Mark's device be close to
tapping into or creating such a powerful magnetic vortex? Has he seen any evidence of
magnetic attraction of any objects in or near the toroids?
Anyway, Mr. Mannix - if you have read this far, then you understand that I have a genuine desire
to understand Mr. Mark's technology. My wife and I will be retiring and living in Sri Lanka soon.
That country is COMPLETELY dependent on imported fossil fuels. It is a lovely but very poor
country. I have been grappling with several ways I may be able to help, and hence have been
spending a lot of time with the Bedini devices. I believe it may have given me a leg up on Steven
Mark's devices. It would be an honor to hear from you, and have your thoughts (and perhaps
even Mr. Mark's) thoughts on my information above.
If you have a way I can find out more about U.E.C., it would be most appreciated. I really feel it is
worth keeping up with Mr. Mark's devices and somehow push for this clean power to become a
marketed module. Heck, one could build them directly INTO appliances with or without inverters
so the appliances would not even HAVE power cords.
|
Author
Topic: Tariel kapanadze's Energy Generator (Read 367758 times)
