@ Wottsup,
I'm using the wind method you suggested in your previous post.
Diodes are exactly as specified by Akula (MBR3545), as this is exercise is to replicate his device as accurately as possible. I do not wish to alter the diodes, just try different coil winding configs as this was the only detail not given to us. The mosfet driver chip mod is IMO valid as there is a push-pull version of his circuit published, so the driver chip is not a significant deviation from this. I have built all three versions.Happy
@Happy
I don't understand why when I look up MBR3545 all I find in terms of specs is stud diodes. All of brands I could find are stud diodes. How is that possible that there is no specs on standard fat diode with this model? I am attaching a pdf of the MBR3545 stud type and see there are differences in the specs between that and the one listed on our parts list. But why is the MBR a stud type when in the Akula30 photo, there is no stud diode? So many inconsistencies.
@verpies
Thanks for your reply and I will post more on that later. I would have liked for you to put down the number the scope would have shown in my question, please.
I think guys should switch to a battery feed, not more. The system has to run with quick gain to achieve a total output. The time required to fill C11 and C3 caps and it should just cruise along. It should not require much to start, not more then a 12v battery an off switch and maybe a fuse.
@all
I made a synopsis of the Akula effort up till now that may help clarify things or help put them in perspective. I know you can get discouraged but things are not so bleak.
After this post I will post something about scoping that may help some of you. @Grumage, I asked you about your waveforms in my previous post and it would have been good if you could answer because your answer is tied in with what I am going to discuss with @verpies later on. You don't need to put up the scope shots, just let meknow if with the probe only the waveform is the same as with a ground.
I would say we are in very good shape. With his last Cap Massacre video, it's as if Akula is talking to us and trying to tell us some things. When he had trouble restarting it around 5:56 onward, how many of you thought, "Hey, you have to readjust the pot you just deregulated man" then he readjusts the pot to make it work again. I am sure he did that on purpose to show us the importance. Спасибо
Akula just hatched his last build and video in what, a few days. He did not spend months working his coils. On his last system, he could have removed those 4 nice fat pots if he really wanted to and replaced them with fixed value resistors after he found the best values with his pots and we would never have known it. Akula Methodology 101.
Akulas videos and builds are telling me "Hey man, the coils have to be 1 pri thicker then the 1 sec, don't overdo it on the winds, either both winds over or both off the gap, the general circuit is this, the looping logic is this (great logic indeed), the diodes can be one big fat guy or three smaller more responsive guys in parallel (like in his last video) and lastly, get control over your R variables. Adjust the Rs to set the loop. Once the effect is found, measure the pot resistance values and replace the pots with a good resistor nearest to those values." That's what he did to make the Akula 30. Instead of matching the coil to the circuit, he is matching the circuit to the coil. As long as the base principle is sound and you realize you need to find the R values, the effect he is showing is replicable in a million ways. hehehe
BUT DOES IT WORK?
Stay tuned folks when Jed says to Eli-may "Eli-may, we'll get that varmint and loop it on home". hahahah
The 4 pot methodology would cut through the chase of getting coil winds perfected to fit a pre-set circuit. Instead of trying 100 coils, try one but with more variables to tune. Otherwise you could be winding coils for the next year. That's what he is trying to tell us.
Sooooooooooooooo, next move should be replace R1, R2, R3 and R5 with 4 comparable pots then find the best finer values. Some here will know more about choosing the right pots. That will give you guys a new way to play but more importantly it will bring us closer to matching the Akula Effect. What can I say any more then that would be redundant.
I am preparing some tests with a flyback ccore (while my ecores arrive) just like in his last video because the core, ecore, ccore should not make that much difference if you employ the base principle. The ecore will just move more flux around but in essence, his last video with the primary pulsing out from both ends for the secondary to catch right away from its ends, tells us the impress is at the first reflection. So that also tells me that in the ecore, each coil has to be on its side of the gap, exactly like in the photo and the ecore mapping I had shown.
I don't know about you guys but this is getting so interesting.
Can't wait to play around with this starting tonight. Can't wait to see one of you guys with the first loop.
wattsup