Thinking out loud I feel that the pulse width is FAR to wide, I was seeing much more interesting results with the very narrow pulses provided by my old PWM.
Cheers Grum.
Hi Grum Funny that you mention this about the pulse width..... I remember seeing another schematic when the thread started that indicated an Emitter Follower configuration for the MOSFET driver part of the circuit. Well the current schematic is Common Emitter , sinking current (with pull-down resistor) and this inverts the TL494 signal (with respect to MOSFET gate), and the Emitter Follower (sourcing current, without pull-up resistor) configuration does NOT invert the signal coming from the TL494 as does the Common Emitter config. So, as of now when the pulse is Narrow @ Pin 11 >> WIDER pulse @ MOSFET GATE, and as stated by Verpies: " because of this inversion, the functions of error amplifiers (pins 2 &15) are also inverted and their activation (pin 3 high) causes the lengthening of MOSFET's ON-state. Longer MOSFET conduction time translates to more average current in the transformer/inductor." OF course more average current in the transformer translates to more average power consumed and apparently more heat generated. So, the Emitter-Follower dirver config. that I saw on the other Akula 30watt schematic would pulse the MOSFET gate 'in time' (non-inverted with respect to gate) with the pulse width of the TL494 logic. This would give a shorter pulse 'in sycn' with the pulse width generated by the TL494 in response to it feedback loop..... I guess the point of this commentary is that it strikes me odd to believe that both so very different circuit driver topologies can be correct, when apparently their action is so very different! Let me know your ideas on this. take care, peace. lost_bro
|