Привет,
Thanks++ to
Matt Watts for pointing out this
gnli.pdf file.
A Skeptic person would state:
No way! 'OU' (a self sustaining device, for ex) is not possible...The official equations are right. Period.
-------------
A 'Believer' would assert, for ex.:
The official equations are wrong or incomplete. The Aether exists (and must be included in the equations).
Einstein was wrong. Period.
--------------
Some persons would declare: yes, the official equations are right. Aether might exists but is not a necessity.
But, we do not take the time into account in these equations. No time in the Coulomb's law, for ex.
We assume that the 'exchanges' are made at the speed of light or near this speed, but, in some process, it is some orders of magnitude less.
You might consult 'Claus W. Turtur'.------------
Other persons would point out that: of course, if we only use half of the equations, assuming that 'C', 'L' and 'M(ass)' are constants, we are not out of the woods 'OU'-wise.
Considering that 'C', 'L' and 'M(ass)' are *not* constant leads to very interesting results.
You also might consult 'Ronald D. Pearson' and 'Ove Tedenstig' who, both, are not assuming that 'M(ass)' has not to be constant.
-----------
You too, can derive d(L.i)/dt and d(C.v)/dt considering that 'L' and 'C' are not constant.
I tried this, but I'm not a mathematician. I got strange results. Not sure of them.
-----------------------------
Back to
gnli.pdf You must (
) consult:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tep62par.htmlast update on 10/12/97
------------------------------
2 pictures:
The initial
gnli.pdf CCT.
My interpretation. I can be wrong.
Author
Topic: Akula0083 30 watt self running generator. (Read 975083 times)
