PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2024-11-26, 22:17:40
News: If you have a suggestion or need for a new board title, please PM the Admins.
Please remember to keep topics and posts of the FE or casual nature. :)

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 48
Author Topic: Akula0083 30 watt self running generator.  (Read 975055 times)
Group: Guest
Dear 4Tesla.

These are the LED's I am using for a load. I have 5 in series times two. I have then put them in parallel to provide a 10W load.

Cheers Grum.

Hi Grum,

I found those on US ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-50pcs-High-Power-1W-Warm-White-LED-Lamp-Bead-Chip-Light-90-100LM-3-2-3-4V-/251435918634?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3a8abfa52a

Nice to have a lot of 50.. just in case some fail.  :)
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
Shot taken across R5 with probe on top of resistor. Supply voltage 6.8V with LED's very bright and the mosfet getting very hot!!
I don't think there is any doubt about that negative going pulse !!  :)
Indeed, that seems to indicate, that the TL494 feedback loop makes sense after all.  I had doubts about that ...and others had too.

Could you scope pin 3 while triggering on pin 5 to check if the TL494 reacts to those pulses at R5/R7.

   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
@Grum

Did you try scoping pin 3 and 11 while triggering the scope on pin 5 ?
   
Group: Guest
Good evening Hoppy.

I don't think there is any doubt about that negative going pulse !!  :)

I have a couple of questions.

1.  Is your transformer wound 15 one end and 45 the other, split between ?

2.  What is your duty cycle ?

I am still testing with a simple Mosfet PWM with less than 10% duty and current measured with DVM from 12VDC 7 AH LAB.  With this set up I rarely reach even 1 Amp !!

Cheers Grum.

Evening Grum,

I think the spike is due to my resistor R5 being slightly inductive at 0.4uH.

My winds are as proposed by Wattsup, as I don't see how Akula's L2 could possibly have 45 turns from looking at the photo inset on his circuit schematic. L1 is 3 layers of 5 turns. L2 is 4 layers of 7 turns, with a full depth split between L1 and L2.

Duty cycle is 35% at 26KHz, falling to 16.2% at 138KHz, as measured from mosfet drain to source.

Regards
Hoppy
   

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2765


Buy me a cigar
@Grum

Did you try scoping pin 3 and 11 while triggering the scope on pin 5 ?

Good evening Verpies.

I am still waiting on parts to arrive for the "Proper" drive board. In the mean time I have been "Transformer bashing" with a simple Mosfet PWM. In the hope of finding that elusive anomaly !!  :)

I had a little accident with my cores, be warned !! Make sure they are firmly clamped together whilst testing as when loose they tend to "clack together" and break !!  Luckily "THE BOSS" allowed me to buy another set so I now have two transformers ( one super glued) !! and wound conventionally. 15 T one end and 45 turn the other. My original wound the T-1000 way.

Cheers Grum.
 


---------------------------
Nanny state ? Left at the gate !! :)
   
Group: Guest
Further investigation into the 'spike' reveals that it disappears at around 31KHz and increases fairly linearly up to max frequency.
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
I had a little accident with my cores, be warned !! Make sure they are firmly clamped together whilst testing as when loose they tend to "clack together" and break !!
I think Peterae has arrived at the conclusion, that "the anomaly" in this transformer depends on these cores "clacking" together, ...just not so hard that they break.  
His observations were quite deft and I don't see any logical errors in his reasoning.
   
Group: Guest
So Verpies, would this be what Akula means be "resonance in resonance" ?

You have a carrier frequency tuned for the transformer and then a feedback frequency that targets the NMR/NAR effect?  Would that be the correct way to look at this circuit?
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
So Verpies, would this be what Akula means be "resonance in resonance" ?
Maybe.  If that is the case then it would mean "acoustic resonance in LC resonance".

You have a carrier frequency tuned for the transformer and then a feedback frequency that targets the NMR/NAR effect?  Would that be the correct way to look at this circuit?
The NMR frequency will depend on the material being resonated and on LF polarizing magnetic flux density (B) during the T1 time.  A perpendicular orientation of the HF resonating magnetic field is also a prerequisite.
With NAR, the acoustic wavelength in relation to the core's size also become a factor but this additional complication is offset by the lack of the detrimental skin effect.
   
Group: Guest
Further investigation into the feedback loop reveals the attached four scope shots all taken with DC coupled (x10 probe) on mosfet gate with signal referenced to ground. The first shot 07 shows the waveform with feedback connected at 47KHz. The second shot 08 shows a reduced amplitude waveform with feedback connected at 68KHz. The third shot 09 shows the waveform with feedback connected at 90KHz. The fourth shot 10 shows no waveform when feedback removed. The transition from waveform to no waveform is sharp and has the effect of switching the output LED's on and off. Disconnecting the feedback below 90KHz does have the effect of reducing the signal amplitude and LED light level slightly. This reduction increases as the frequency rises towards the 90KHz switching point. Supply voltage 6.8V.

Hoppy
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
The N-Ch MOSFET gets stuck in the ON state?  (100% DUC)
Even without the scopeshot on pin 3, it is evident that the TL494 reacts to the feedback signal and the whole feedback loop is not bogus.
   
Group: Guest
The N-Ch MOSFET gets stuck in the ON state?  (100% DUC)
Even without the scopeshot on pin 3, it is evident that the TL494 reacts to the feedback signal and the whole feedback loop is not bogus.

Yes, it would appear to be intended as a form of current limiting which makes sense given an LED load. However, I still cannot see how this device operates on 12V because I connected a 12V battery with a clamp meter to measure current and fleetingly recorded at least a 12A draw without feedback and a steady7.5A (at lowest frequency setting) with feedback and LED's bright. That was with a 0.68R big power resistor in place of the 0.24R (5 x paralleled 2W 1.2R), which all very quickly smoked with and without feedback! Also, as Grum has reported, I heard a loud 'clack' from the ferrite core on connection to the battery.

   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3961


Buy me some coffee
If you start gluing the core, only glue to the 2 outside parts of the E Core, leave the middle faces just touching with no glue, the outside glue will hold it together OK hopefully.

The other way is to use elastic bands around the outside of the core to force the 2 halves together, at least this way there's space for inserting spacers etc.
   
Group: Guest
If you start gluing the core, only glue to the 2 outside parts of the E Core, leave the middle faces just touching with no glue, the outside glue will hold it together OK hopefully.

The other way is to use elastic bands around the outside of the core to force the 2 halves together, at least this way there's space for inserting spacers etc.

It might also be an idea to vary the DC bias current by adjustment of R1 with and without spacers to see if we can reach a point where the core can 'chatter'. I have a feeling that Akula could be testing us and having a laugh when we create smoke and crack ferrites!!!
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
I have a feeling that Akula could be testing us and having a laugh when we create smoke and crack ferrites!!!
There is always a risk of that if he monitors this forum.  Is he able to?
IMO clacking/chattering core should be free to do so.  Dampening materials will attenuate that ...especially in the gap.
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 520
@all

I decided to remove this post due to lack of interest. Just do what you want to do. I will make the circuit when it arrives and do this on my own. It will be much simpler then trying to explains things here.

wattsup

« Last Edit: 2014-04-08, 14:15:05 by wattsup »


---------------------------
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3961


Buy me some coffee
Grumage
where are you buying your core & Bobbins from in the UK?

Thanks
Peter
   

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2765


Buy me a cigar
Grumage
where are you buying your core & Bobbins from in the UK?

Thanks
Peter

Dear Peter and all.

Both Itsu and I got our bobbins and cores from here.

http://powermagnetics.co.uk/calculator.     From this handy inductance calculator you can go to the shop.  If you order in the AM it will usually be with you the following day (UK)  for Itsu 2 days !!

We bought these. http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/ferrite-cores/etd-cores/etd49-cf139   And the bobbin. http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/coil-formers-bobbins/bobbins-for-etd-cores/etd49-90794-20p

Hope this is of help ??

Cheers Grum.


---------------------------
Nanny state ? Left at the gate !! :)
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 336
Dear Peter and all.

Both Itsu and I got our bobbins and cores from here.

http://powermagnetics.co.uk/calculator.     From this handy inductance calculator you can go to the shop.  If you order in the AM it will usually be with you the following day (UK)  for Itsu 2 days !!

We bought these. http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/ferrite-cores/etd-cores/etd49-cf139   And the bobbin. http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/coil-formers-bobbins/bobbins-for-etd-cores/etd49-90794-20p

Hope this is of help ??

Cheers Grum.

Grum,

Only EPCOS ETD29/16/10 bobbin and cores will fit the boards that I have designed.

GL.
   

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2765


Buy me a cigar
To all in chat !!


---------------------------
Nanny state ? Left at the gate !! :)
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3961


Buy me some coffee
OK so why is aKula not using standard preferred resistor values, the only time I've seen that is when either the resistor value is really critical for correct operation, or you get a theoretical non practical person designing the thing.

I think we know he is indeed a practical guy so then why R8 & R9 are 4.02K, i did notice that this value is orderable, also
R10 6.98K again totally weird value to use.

and then we have a 4K7 pot, that's an old world pot value, normally these days they make 5K
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
OK so why is aKula not using standard preferred resistor values, the only time I've seen that is when
either the resistor value is really critical for correct operation, or
you get a theoretical non practical person designing the thing.
Yes, nonstandard resistor values usually mean critical or theoretical reasons.
...but are those values really so non-standard for 1% resistors ?
« Last Edit: 2014-04-06, 23:42:40 by verpies »
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 336
OK so why is aKula not using standard preferred resistor values, the only time I've seen that is when either the resistor value is really critical for correct operation, or you get a theoretical non practical person designing the thing.

I think we know he is indeed a practical guy so then why R8 & R9 are 4.02K, i did notice that this value is orderable, also
R10 6.98K again totally weird value to use.

and then we have a 4K7 pot, that's an old world pot value, normally these days they make 5K

Peter,

Akyla did use 4K, 5K, 7K and 7R in the drawing. Looking at his board it seems that he used 5% or 10% resistors.
In my part design I did use 1% 4,02K, 5,1K and 6,98K and 6,8R. I think the values I have chosen is well inside the
5% and 10% tolerances of the resistors Akyla did use.

So if we use %5 resistors for the Akyla values we get:

4K can be from 3,80K to 4,20K
5K can be from 4,75K to 5,25K
7K can be from 6,65K to 7,35K
7R can be from 6,65R to 7,35R

For 10% resistors we get even more spread.

GL.
   

Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3499
To all in chat !!

What are the scope probes positions for this scopeshot?
Is Ch1 the voltage on pin 3 ?

   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 375
Dear Peter and all.

Both Itsu and I got our bobbins and cores from here.

http://powermagnetics.co.uk/calculator.     From this handy inductance calculator you can go to the shop.  If you order in the AM it will usually be with you the following day (UK)  for Itsu 2 days !!

We bought these. http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/ferrite-cores/etd-cores/etd49-cf139   And the bobbin. http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/coil-formers-bobbins/bobbins-for-etd-cores/etd49-90794-20p

Hope this is of help ??

Cheers Grum.

I just got http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/ferrite-cores/etd-cores/etd49-cf129 x2 + http://powermagnetics.co.uk/pace-components/coil-formers-bobbins/bobbins-for-etd-cores/etd49-90794-20p there. Hopefully can find time to assemble 555 circuit (will see if I can make feedback as per original circuit for duty cycle) on next weekend when order will arrive. Very curious if I can find anything unusual within transformer. As in way I suggested windings there it should be interesting to see things going inside of transformer with main frequency and feedback blocking pulses... :)

What are the scope probes positions for this scopeshot?
Is Ch1 the voltage on pin 3 ?
Channel 1 - VT1-C3 (isolated ground)
Channel 2 - across C4 (isolated ground on C3)


Cheers!
   
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 48
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-11-26, 22:17:40