OK i have the wrong way around, a stronger mag flux increases the NMR,
Darn, I noticed the inversion but forgot to mention it. Manganese resonates at 1057Hz/Gauss (or 10.570MHz/Tesla) and 100% of naturally occurring Manganese is susceptible to NMR (and NAR). Compare it with only 4.1% for Zinc which resonates at 267Hz/Gauss (2.67MHz/T). P.S. The Meyer device diagram from the 1976 article in Science et Vie, depicts a Copper rod. Meyer's patents FR2680613 and FR9110472 and FR2385255 and CZ284333 all mention an Iron rod. The patent FR9110472 is alleged to contain a crucial detail necessary for replication of the Meyer's device. I never read this patent. In his embodiments, Meyer attempts to saturate the Iron rod, because without saturation, its magnetic permeability is so high, that the evil Skin Effect prevents any significant penetration of high frequency magnetic fields into the rod. FYI: Iron saturates at 2.14T. Only 2.2% of Iron responds to NMR and NAR and its responsive isotope, Iron-57 has nuclear resonance frequency of 138Hz/Gauss. 69% of Copper resonates at 1132Hz/Gauss and 31% of Copper resonates at 1210Hz/G. 100% of Aluminum resonates at 1110Hz/G.
« Last Edit: 2014-04-02, 19:17:42 by verpies »
|