PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
OverUnity Research > Benches > giantkiller (Moderator: giantkiller) > Current avoidance
2024-11-27, 02:31:48
News: Forum TIP:
The SHOUT BOX deletes messages after 3 hours. It is NOT meant to have lengthy conversations in. Use the Chat feature instead.

Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Current avoidance  (Read 3614 times)
Topic Options img
img  giantkiller
Current avoidance « on: 2012-06-12, 18:22:23 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1593
Frequency equals matter...


Buy me a drink
Tesla  showed high frequency, high potential.
Keely  showed high frequency, high pressure.
Brown showed high frequency, high potential.
Meyer showed high frequency.
Hutchison showed high frequency, high potential.

These men expressed high levels of excitation to transmit power or alter matter.
No where did they promote current flow. Close your books of academia. The hallowed halls promote dependency to a level of detail that obfuscates the truth.

High power is not produced but gained through manipulation of the [Wheel works of nature].
A dependency on generated current keeps us subscribed to falacies.

Or just microwave yourself and explain that nothing  happened.
Or expose yourself to ELF: http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/elfhealth.pdf
« Last Edit: 2012-06-12, 19:45:13 by giantkiller »


---------------------------
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
   
img  Grumpy
Re: Current avoidance « Reply #1 on: 2012-06-12, 20:22:57 »

Group: Tinkerer
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3948
tExB=qr
Quote from: giantkiller on 2012-06-12, 18:22:23
Tesla  showed high frequency, high potential.
Keely  showed high frequency, high pressure.
Brown showed high frequency, high potential.
Meyer showed high frequency.
Hutchison showed high frequency, high potential.

These men expressed high levels of excitation to transmit power or alter matter.
No where did they promote current flow. Close your books of academia. The hallowed halls promote dependency to a level of detail that obfuscates the truth.

High power is not produced but gained through manipulation of the [Wheel works of nature].
A dependency on generated current keeps us subscribed to falacies.

Or just microwave yourself and explain that nothing  happened.
Or expose yourself to ELF: http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/elfhealth.pdf


Yeah.   No one will research along these line without a YouTube video to support it.
   
img  giantkiller
Re: Current avoidance « Reply #2 on: 2012-06-12, 21:08:16 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1593
Frequency equals matter...


Buy me a drink
Manipulation at the subatomic level ist verboten

We must only control at the molecular level to be legal. Cook, clean, & consume.
Ah, but the Government can allow products that harm at the atomic/subatomic level.

After years of involvement in OverUnity. This is the rule.
And the reason all my tests are dangerous is. Can anybody guess?


---------------------------
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
   
img  giantkiller
Re: Current avoidance « Reply #3 on: 2024-04-24, 03:23:23 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1593
Frequency equals matter...


Buy me a drink


---------------------------
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
   
img  giantkiller
Re: Current avoidance « Reply #4 on: 2024-04-24, 03:24:49 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1593
Frequency equals matter...


Buy me a drink


---------------------------
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
   
img  giantkiller
Re: Current avoidance « Reply #5 on: 2024-05-02, 22:06:22 »

Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1593
Frequency equals matter...


Buy me a drink
This is what Otto's PDF stated.


---------------------------
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
   
img  3D Magnetics
Re: Current avoidance « Reply #6 on: 2024-05-03, 07:44:58 »
Group: Elite Experimentalist
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 342
If you read Mikes build description you will see that the particles Otto  mentions are very similar to Mikes more elaborate explanations.
Right down to the source follower that Otto describes as negative pulses.
Otto died building his last version described in his doc . I know that he felt it was urgent to post his doc which I did for him. We don't know if he was testing at the time so some speculation there.

The problem we all face is context, as we all have different backgrounds and knowledge we acquire from our past work experience.
some of us have a more pragmatic approach and in your case very broard strokes that can be hard to put into context .

So far Mike has the best info but he can be difficult to follow as changes happen on the fly with some omissions and a few typos.
Remember he is trying to teach the operation as he understands it ,,,stay with him !

Eventually I might try to teach it as I understand it but  not yet !  Im still a bit stupid.

 
   
Pages: [1]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2024-11-27, 02:31:48