|
@MH That should really pretty much wrap up this thread...I mean as a final statement. At least until the first fully functional production units are delivered (well beyond our lifespan, I'm betting).
@Poynt99 and Aetherevarising
Quote from this thread by Ms. Ainslee: "Our own device showed an unarguable result at COP >17. Glen's device showed COP>7. Those two facts I KNOW. I have all the empirical evidence that I or any reasonable scientist requires. I KNOW that both Glen's and my device showed repeated performance levels where more energy was returned to the battery than was ever supplied."
This is apparently yet a new claim. Not only does it heat a resistor 17 times more efficiently than a straight wire hookup, but it now also charges its own battery at the same time! Oh, my God! This is such amazingly great news! Heat your home and cook your food and dry your clothes (which accounts for about 90% of all household electrical usage) for 1/17 the cost and get free battery charging too (to cover all the lighting and small appliances)! Will wonders never cease? It certainly sounds like she is saying that a self-running heater is on the near horizon (if only all the scientists in the world weren't so unreasonable).
Why is this particular lady immune to and exempt from the "OU claiming rule" I've recently observed Poynt getting all over the FLEET guy (Lawrence) about?
I've followed the insane decade-long saga of the "COP 17" heater front to back on all the forums. I've seen nothing close to any kind of proof or even a hint of an indication of OU. This may not be the right place to bring up such a question but her thread is locked (no wonder given the total lack of valid testing being done or discussed...100% pure infighting, rude nonsensical philosophical bickering and name-calling) and it is from this thread right here that I have taken Ms. Ainslee's quotation.
Maybe this (my question above) should be asked in a PM. I'd love to lay forth an extremely simple and step-by-step irrefutably logical test plan for any black box with battery input and heat output that skips all the fancy Tek scopes (despite my owning one) and bickering and tedious measurements involving Excel spreadsheets and millions of samples to number-crunch. All of that crap is entirely unnecessary to validate any such system with an actual OU of say 3 or better.
If her device can pass my simple test with an indicated OU of 3 or better, I hereby pledge that I will volunteer to apply all my remaining time on Earth (it won't take that long) and all my experience at getting products designed and onto the market (including huge nasty screaming 40.68MHz multi-kilowatt RF-powered CO2 plasma lasers) with full worldwide FCC, CE, FDA and UL safety and emissions compliance. Free of charge! Wherever and whenever she says. I'll supply my own food, shelter, lab and test gear as well as time and vast experience at doing successful new product design, approval, documentation and release. And I'll do it happily, with enthusiasm and great joy!
Why the folks on these various forums allow people to get away with evolving these elaborate and extremely difficult and argumentative test approaches I will never understand unless it's simply group-willed procrastination. Test procedures that require literally years to even agree upon, months more to gather the exotic expensive gear and years more to complete and document the test results when an ultra-simple and definitive test method (that takes no equipment you can't get at Radio Shack and any local drugstore for under $20 and which most folks already own) is totally clear and glaringly obvious. I'll never understand.
The only reason I can think of is that everyone, including the mods, the forum owners, the proud delusionary inventors, the replicators, the referee/teachers like MH and even guys like me...the lookie-loo somewhat skeptical audience...we all want to prolong the agony and exstasy of the insanely tedious and delusionally prolonged journey from claim to disproof, I guess. It's entertainment. God, I am so bored! Never thought retirement would be this tedious!
Where should I post my foolproof, simple test setup and procedure for Ms. Ainslee's invention?
« Last Edit: 2011-01-14, 18:48:44 by humbugger »
|
Author
Topic: Magnacoaster (Read 133058 times)
