@Farmhand Still no reference by Tesla to say that the transmitter was meant to be a free energy device. Where do people get all the free energy claptrap from regarding these things ? Nikola Tesla states:
“I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device. … I have advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found it completely justified. The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a [power] plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight. All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charged ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser [capacitor] which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan.” You know there was another great mind by the name of Victor Schauberger and Victor stated we should always consider things in an opposite sense, we should do the opposite of what we do today. This is not any easy task as we have been taught to think a certain way from the day we are born, we have been told what to think from the moment we could comprehend the spoken word, we think we are open minded but we are not. Now if Tesla's transmitter was doing the exact opposite to what you think then what would he be doing?. His transmitter was based on the wave like disturbances from lightning strikes as well as the phenomena relating to what occurs when the circuit is closed on a long transmission line, he tells us --- " the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charged ions and electrons". Could it be that you have it completely backwards?, is Tesla producing a discharge to transmit energy or is he producing a conductive path for something already present to discharge itself producing a wave like disturbance to transmit energy?. In the former we must always lose and we have nothing to gain in the latter the only energy required is that to switch on a conductive path for naturally occurring energy to flow from one region to another and if the energy flow can sustain the switching losses then the process is self-sustaining. You see there is always another way and while we would senselessly hammer on the surface of a body of water in order to create waves we could just as easily drain a very small volume of it abruptly and produce the very same waves. Now if we never have to refill the body of water which is absurd then what have we lost and what have we gained?. In general I have a simple rule, if we have not considered everything in an opposite sense as well then we are completely lacking in perspective and understanding. I would have though people would have figured this out by now, Equal and Opposite ..... Equal yet Opposite... We do the opposite yet produce the same result. AC
« Last Edit: 2012-10-31, 15:39:39 by allcanadian »
---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
|
Author
Topic: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (Read 151290 times)
