The thread is "heating up" har har...
This one goes out to Slovenia, noting that he is also a member here. Quoting you:
Can Tuning
Can needs to be tuned to 50 Hz for EU and 60 Hz for USA. When properly fitted with the right ring and gap, the can will play at a higher level. If I recall right, 300 Hz for EU and 400 Hz for USA. That's from memory. If it is tuned properly to Mr. "C"s specs, it will operate at a COP of 10 for EU and COP of 12 for USA.
You can't get away with just saying something is true and expect people to believe you. You have to show test results and have at least three separate people reproduce the tests with multiple test runs that show their data is confirming what you are alleging. The presentation of the data has to be honest and credible with all of the details shown and not minimalist and cryptic.
OU
We have people on this forum who are getting OU with these principles. I won't mention any names, but they are getting it. The key is to tune the tube to the appropriate frequency either by sanding or electronic means. If you get it tuned to the right frequency and then you get your ring the right gap, then you will enjoy OU. The dimensions of the ring are important too as well as the diameter and thickness of the tube metal.
You have to mention names, even if they are just anonymous Internet forum handles. At least that's a start. I can say, "I know somebody that puts pink elephants in the sky every second Tuesday over the center of Greenland," and my statement is just as valid as yours.
So far Slovenia, the only two credible test results are Cherryman's bathtub test and PhysicProf's test done today. Both tests show no over unity. You might say, "But the tests were done without tuning so they don't count." My response to you is
bring it on. Let's see somebody present credible results with the "tuning" done and let's see what the results look like.
This has been going on for more than four months. For four months you have been talking about getting over unity and saying that it is possible and nobody has shown over unity at all.
Welcome to the real world, I don't think many will dispute my description of the current state of affairs. When nobody can demonstrate over unity, I challenge you to acknowledge this issue and discuss it, just like I am challenging Chet to do the same thing.
Chet has an action plan to follow-up with a person that he is working with that is claiming COP 7. That person is supposed to present credible data without actually showing what the device itself looks like. If that actually happens we will see how it works out. Your claims of anonymous people getting over unity should follow the same process, a credible presentation of the data without necessarily having to see the device itself. Of course it would be preferable if they showed the device.
I just don't buy into the claim that "shadowy anonymous replicators that are members of the Energetic Forum have successfully replicated the device with COP 10 or COP 12." Why do they have to hide? It's not credible and these forums are supposed to be places where people openly share setups and procedures and test data. Why is it when some of them allegedly have good results that they have to hide in the shadows? How come you allegedly know them and can drop big hints that the system works but you can't mention their names? Like I said, welcome to the real world. People on these forums are sick to death and tired beyond belief of hearing that "somebody has it working but they have to remain anonymous and they are not going to share information about their setup, test procedures, or test data." People are sick of this and you are part of the problem when you make statements like this.
Finally Slovenia, I challenge you to comment on the results whether they be good or bad. You have not commented on the two credible results so far that show no over unity. If you yourself want to be credible, then you have to comment on all of the test data, good and bad.
MileHigh
Author
Topic: Serbian Professor Savic Sonic water heater replication COP 12 (Read 345305 times)
