With the great abundance of Free Energy devices floating around on the internet at present, along with all the various claims, it’s sometimes hard to know where to start, or indeed which particular device to study if you intend to try to replicate such a device.
I’ve been in this very dilemma myself for quite a while now, randomly experimenting with various parts and ideas, mainly in the Water Fuel Cell field.
However, I’ve more recently come to the conclusion that the underlying efficiency of any so-called over-Faraday WFC, lies not in the electrolyser producing over-Faraday amounts of gas due to any kind of resonance within the cells themselves, but rather the electronics tapping into Radiant Energy. I feel that any resonance effects are those related to the electronics, particularly that in which pulsed inductors and tuned ccts are employed, and this is what is providing effectively OU electricity.
I have never understood how any electrolyser, no matter how efficient could possibly produce over-Faraday results. Faraday’s Laws are very simple and quite inflexible given that it will always take two electrons from the power source to combine with two hydrogen ions (H+) to form a hydrogen molecule. However, this assumes that the water is ionising and those ions are exchanging charges at the electrodes. Other forms of water decomposition such as plasma electrolysis and high temperature dissociation initiate different reactions to which Faraday’s laws cannot be applied.
However, anyone that simply dismisses Faraday’s Laws as a set of ancient out-of-date, ‘rules’, is obviously ignorant of the laws an quite foolish. They are called laws for a reason, and every standard or pulsed electrolyser from which hydrogen and oxygen are evolved at the electrodes due to current flow and charge exchange, abides by these laws. Due to this very fact, Faraday will always provide the baseline against which all other forms of water dissociation are measured.
This is how I’ve come to look at things and the reason for my now turning to look at things from the Radiant Energy or OU perspective.
Like many of you, I’ve looked at all manner of patents, devices, followed experimenters, and read many technical papers and various articles on the subject. But I did not want to fall into the trap of trying to replicate or experiment with all and sundry and getting confusing or conflicting results – or indeed simply making life too complicated.
No, I wanted to focus all my attention on just two or three particular devices.
One would be a motionless device, while the other would not. Both however would incorporate neodymium iron boron magnets. And I would pursue one other Free Energy interest that does not employ magnets.
After playing with neodymium magnets for a while, you can’t fail to feel the energy that they exude.
Just trying to push together two neos, each just 2mm thick by 10mm in diameter, between your fingers, north to north or south to south, is near impossible. The only way I could pull these two magnets apart when north to south is by sliding then apart.
I was astounded by the energy of these tiny magnets and so bought some larger beasties; 10mm thick and 30mm diameter. The energy contained within these magnets is frightening, and they actually come with a health warning. You do not really want them to snap together with your finger in between.
Only in a vice that held each magnet securely could we get the repulsive poles to force together. The repulsive (or attractive) force of modern neo magnets is quite phenomenal. Surely there must be numerous ways to utilise this energy. And so it seems there are.
I found that a man called Charles Flynn and his devices fit my bill exactly. He has a design for an OU magnet motor and an OU motionless device that are both relatively simply devices in both terms of operation and construction. Indeed the motionless device looks comparable in many ways to the rather more mysterious SM TPU.
So this is where I intend to focus my efforts.
As for my non-magnet interest, this will be based on Tesla’s Radiant Energy system.
It would seem pointless trying to achieve OU unless we accept that energy has to come from outside of our device and that our device must be providing a means of tapping into (or resonating) with the vast ocean of radiant energy that we exist within. If we are to trust the laws of thermodynamics then I don’t see how we can get seemingly OU from a closed system. And I have no reason to mistrust the laws of thermodynamics, just as I have no reason to mistrust Faraday’s laws of electrolysis, so something’s gotta give!
If you haven’t seen this guide by Patrick Kelly, and particularly if you’re new to this field, then it’s certainly worth a read. This is a link to the version 13.6 released 5th Jan 2010.
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/index2.htmlThe Charles Flynn devices of particular interest to me are located in Chapter 1, pages 35-36 and Chapter 3, pages 9-11.
Author
Topic: Initial thoughts (Read 5054 times)
