http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPquvsacG5MAh well I made a sweeping statement on erfinders thread .. I'd best put some meat to the gristle !
But where to start? And with what “attitude” .. first understand I only have a very tentative grip on these quite old and suppressed theories myself and added to that you will be annoyed and frustrated because your own dogma does not do service .
In short you will be tempted to question what I am writing here .. and possibly rightly so .. however like Theseus I am myself feeling my way out of a deep maze clutching a very fine thread, I have also probably like you folks been on “free energy” web sites .. for years .. and ever amen , I know the attention span of forum folks is generally about the same as a rubber duck. Followed by a quick flick around a few other web sites to see if there's supporting evidence .. It wont fit the bill here .. concentration acumen and a determination to get to a mathematical , scientific resolve is what's needed here. In my youth my mathematics and theory was pretty good in a slap and tickle sort of way
… I managed a few insignificant letters after my name which were not quite outright blasphemy however all the pencils in the box are a little blunt now .. so rather than take an adversarial view I would much rather you investigated further the subject matter I present and amplify it that others may clearly see . After all if as Desiderius Erasmus says
In the Kingdom of the blind the one eyed man is King .. if I am to be that one eyed man then poking my one eye out with a stick helps no one!
So where to start such a subject .. as simple as possible I guess .. here is a sentence out of a pretty good description of zero point energy
This is strong evidence for the presence of zero point energy, but it is not coherence. We can not extract useful energy from this force,
just as we can't extract energy from permanent magnets. (Yeah right nobody told Howard Johnson)
(actually from here
http://www.rmcybernetics.com/science/physics/zpe.htm#1642 if your interested)
Permanent magnets ah .. well here's some moving about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIZG2MyEu0A and I'm happy to suggest that left to their own devices they will be moving about long after you or anybody reading this isn't . Useful energy ? Well its displacing air … put a spoon on it make it stir
your coffie .. make it huge and put some coils around it if fact do what you want with it .. the statement is false ! A law can't just be a law of convenience. … The thing is this ... because Its chaotic certainly doesn't mean there is nothing there .. Does this break any laws … well I haven't got time to worry about how much energy it took to make the glue and that sort of bull shit … In fact
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLnTWxpTQt4I do want to know how to resolve the high entropy (disorder) of energy that is around us and bring it to heel ..
It Is Albert Lieingstein who said “Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another” I believe he was part and parcel of a conspiracy however this is one of his rare truth's . Its around you … In a state of high entropy .. we just must grasp it and change it to do our bidding. So This thread is about far more than harmonics .. and overtones .. Its about every free energy device that ever was made and as Tesla says himself .. “The secret of the Universe”
"If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.”
-Tesla
There may be folks on this forum much quicker than I .. In fact I hope there's an excellent applied mathematician about some where … and in case there is before I go much further let me point out the overtone progression above .. 3rd 5th 7th 9th the majors of which are of course 3rd and 9th the significance of the 6 is that its the centre figure .. in other words in a resonant state everything is cumulative on 6.
What this means is .. as we humans count with base 10 and start at zero natures system which is essentually musical and starts at 6. and moves in odds and evens .. just as our number system does. Tesla is giving you the key components in that overtone chain.
Still the harmonics and overtones … I found it very difficult to discover anything that even remotely resembles the way I was taught this subject by an aged professer many years ago now. I had just about given up the case and assumed the internet had been swept clean when this came to my notice , This Dutchman knows what an overtone is and he knows what a harmonic is, He seems to do a pretty good job of explaining .. and so if you are prepared to take a little time to understand and digest what he is saying here you will too … And that will be a very very big thing!
If you simply grasp tightly to this simple sentence from the page and never question it again why that will be a huge leap!
In counting
harmonics are not overtones.Here is the guys web site he is obviously writing with some frustration of the ignorance him self !
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-harmonics.htm You might also keep in mind that I very much doubt in the light of the overtone information that Rife and Peter Davey were clarinet players is any sort of accident. I would like you also to digest the overtone progression .. Strangely this progression also works as a pattern inverted … Some time ago I became Interested in a subject MJN now on this forum proposed .. that is very efficient water fracture, I am not a rich person .. In fact rather the reverse , and so before considering any project I'm afraid I have a good hard look at the Inventor , As Michael provided a full name and I happen to live on the same little Island where he did his thing … I investigated him .. just as I would a family tree for instance . I dare say Michael would be a little perturbed himself if he knew the detail available .. still to cut a long story short I knew he had done what he claimed I knew he was an honest broker before ever I joined his thread. For various reasons I did not complete that project … There were break ins threats and vehicle damage involved .. as for Michael .. I don’t know much the same I Imagine, In all fairness Michael did warn me , I didn't really believe him .. I know better now! As I say .. not a rich person I could not sustain the damage being done .
That which I have just explained regarding entropy Putarich, Mayer and of course Mike reversed the process … The took the x6 six frequency separation The reason for which I have all ready explained , took to near perfect sine waves, and smashed them into each other .. (heterodyne if you want to be twee)
As I say Its the reverse effect .. Michael is using to near perfect sine waves with the x6 frequency separation to create what might be viewed as perfect chaos .. or perhaps by some as Stochastic resonance . Here then from what seem many years ago .. on another forum is Michael explaining the reverse action of what I am starting to project at you now !
http://www.energeticforum.com/water-fuel/6431-none-electrolytic-splitting-h2o-4.html#post111774