@Hakasays: that's a good bit of info, thanks for typing it up. I never knew there were
that many #interpretations of aether. It sort of proves my point in and of itself. My favourite is Dollards'. I like yours too - keeps it to the deducible.
F6: In the interest of particularity, I would conclude that we mostly agree given the polarizing context, on all the points made except the last two, and just parts of the previous.
Comparing out definitions there are slight differences not worthy of mention, however some more noticeable;
- Heat pumps have COP:4+ right on the label, meaning they produce more "energy" out than in, by means of a trigger circuit. (pump & int. & ext. fans) that would make it over-unity to my perspective, they're just not looped, usually.
- As I see it, looped operation technically need not be sustained, (only in an ideal world) - merely implemented - regen braking in electric cars is a looped system, but by no means is it self sustaining.
"Magnets", "conspiracy theory"... These terms are already defined in everyday language, there is no need for twisted, esoteric and ideologically biased and closed redefinitions for the specific FE/OU domain."
They're defined, sure, but not very clearly.
Even to qualified, PHD holding physicists, I'm pretty sure magnets are still a mystery, there is still controversy as such..
Best we can do is speculate on their unique physical characteristics until methodology and equipment is developed with which to probe further into their properties, as I'm sure it soon will be, or may have already been, I have much research to do, and will quite honestly admit that, this is not a pissing match.
What I said RE conspiracy theory is accurate, even if it reads as outlandish - I have seen it personally! Each to their own - both of us may yet be wrong in our assertions.
Dragon: "Over Unity implies a device that is creating energy - does not exist"
- Eric Dollard may have something to say about that in his "Energy Synthesis" lecture. Check it out.
"Looped would fall into the over unity catAgory"
- I disagree. They are two entirely separate articles to be considered independently of one another.
One should not imply the other. They are however, synonymous, or rather, affiliated terms.
"Coefficiency of performance designates an energy that is being extracted in conjunction with the energy that is being put into the device adding together as the total output. this could also, in part fall into the free energy area."
- Again, separate articles as I see it - to be considered independently, I actualy don't like the term free energy, it does more harm than good. It's a bit silly, really.
All the energy we use is already there in one way or another, I believe we must pay to access it, fundamentally, because that's the status quo demands.
(That's just my opinion though, don't shoot me, lol)
The purpose of this thread has revealed itself quite nicely, there is much yet to be unanimously agreed upon, yet in order to efficiently communicate, we have to be meaning the same thing if you get me?
I feel as though this thread could get messy if we're not clear with one another
Author
Topic: Distinctions between FE Terminology (Read 1014 times)
